Rhapsody

MikeEnRegalia wrote: ^ what's your beef with the Gathering? They are not even remotely similar to Rhapsody or Nightwish.

I was not comparing between them, they are totally different...

just expressed my opinion with examples... different of course

and BTW the Gathering are among my favourite bands

Bob Greece wrote: This message is in the wrong section! It should be in the prog music lounge as Rhapsody are already in Prog Archives: http://www.progarchives.com/Progressive_rock_discography_BAN D.asp?band_id=1268 Normally people post in the prog music lounge instead of another section. This is the first time I've seen it the other way round. So Rhapsody are here and that means they must be prog ... but I don't like them. The idea of mixing orchestras with metal is great but I don't think Rhapsody do it very well. They use too many choirs.

no, that does not mean that IMO

there are many bands that should not be here IMO e.g. The Gathering, Nightwish

aapatsos wrote: ÉÌÏ they copy themselves from another record to another... their last one though sounds interesting... I never really liked them... I can't stand this type of speed/power metal anymore I would rather listen to old Helloween or Blind guardian

i dont really like helloween but blind guardian..mmmm....   their latest works should be concidered prog metal i suppose. demons and wizards for instance... that not BG but whatever...there are a lot of influences by BG there...hansi is a genious   though guitar riffs in demons and wizards are more like iced earth which i dont like a lot but its cool anyway.

yeah rhapsody keep repeating themselves. and their latest work (syphony 2) is their best work. it is most dramatic, most completed... at lest thats what i think... and that their proggiest work IMO