Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Cat Stevens & Marillion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCat Stevens & Marillion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 11:02

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 10:56
Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Can you imagine God creating Velvetclown ???????? I rest my case !!

If God hadn't created him, someone would have to invent him!Wink




Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 10:51

Can you imagine God creating Velvetclown ???????? I rest my case !!



Edited by Velvetclown
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 10:42
Originally posted by Pixel Pirate Pixel Pirate wrote:

Touche about the monotheistic point,foiled by my own reasoning!

But since no person daring to call himself an intelligent being will question that,as someone once said, religion is a form of mental illness,the fact that millions of people believe that god created himself proves only the rather pathetic state of human minds in general and not that their assertion is a true one. Millions of people all over the world firmly believe that they are routinely abducted by aliens,but however many there are,and however convinced they are that they're right,doesn't make them right. When christianity was introduced in Greece the greek philosophers thought the christian notion of blind faith quite ridiculous since,as they said: You can't believe,you must know. In other words: The way to view the world is to gather the facts and base your views on that. Not to have a pre conceived notion and then try to force the world to conform to that notion. That has always been the religious way and it's obviously wrong,so no amount of fervent belief from any religious quarter can shake the anthropological and psychological facts that quite clearly show that man created god,not the other way round. So whoever did create monotheism,it must have been a human agency since god is part of mankind's mythology like Jupiter,Hydra,The Easter Bunny or Gandalf,and as far as I'm aware,no figment of human imagination has ever created itself,therefore the religious viewpoint is a moot one.

And,by the way,the phenomenon of religion was actually invented by our long lost  forebears,the Neanderthals about 70 000 years ago and the Neanderthals were too simple and too un-evolved to have had anything like a theology,they reacted purely instinctively,which proves quite conlusively that the origin of religion lies in simple fear of natural forces and has nothing to do with Zeus,Jupiter,God,Allah,Buddha,L.Ron Hubbard or any of the other billion forms it has since taken.

PIXIE- your writing is very articulate. You should,however, get out of the habit of trying to pass off speculation as fact. Tell me once and for all conclusively how you know EXACTLY what Neanderthals did or didnt believe. Who had the first montheistic society. THIS IS SPECULATION!!!!!

Tell me conclusively that there is no God!Ermm

As I said I am a convinced atheist,and I too am frustrated by all the duplicity in organised religion and that God is just a metaphor for things we cant explain.But as I said these are things we can't explain!




Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 10:35

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Well spoken Pixel !!!!

I think we've been here before...

Are you being ironic?

You Velveteen Fool you!Big smile




Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 09:04
Well spoken Pixel !!!!
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 08:59

Touche about the monotheistic point,foiled by my own reasoning!

But since no person daring to call himself an intelligent being will question that,as someone once said, religion is a form of mental illness,the fact that millions of people believe that god created himself proves only the rather pathetic state of human minds in general and not that their assertion is a true one. Millions of people all over the world firmly believe that they are routinely abducted by aliens,but however many there are,and however convinced they are that they're right,doesn't make them right. When christianity was introduced in Greece the greek philosophers thought the christian notion of blind faith quite ridiculous since,as they said: You can't believe,you must know. In other words: The way to view the world is to gather the facts and base your views on that. Not to have a pre conceived notion and then try to force the world to conform to that notion. That has always been the religious way and it's obviously wrong,so no amount of fervent belief from any religious quarter can shake the anthropological and psychological facts that quite clearly show that man created god,not the other way round. So whoever did create monotheism,it must have been a human agency since god is part of mankind's mythology like Jupiter,Hydra,The Easter Bunny or Gandalf,and as far as I'm aware,no figment of human imagination has ever created itself,therefore the religious viewpoint is a moot one.

And,by the way,the phenomenon of religion was actually invented by our long lost  forebears,the Neanderthals about 70 000 years ago and the Neanderthals were too simple and too un-evolved to have had anything like a theology,they reacted purely instinctively,which proves quite conlusively that the origin of religion lies in simple fear of natural forces and has nothing to do with Zeus,Jupiter,God,Allah,Buddha,L.Ron Hubbard or any of the other billion forms it has since taken.

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 07:20
Originally posted by Pixel Pirate Pixel Pirate wrote:

Reed,that the Jews invented monotheism is a matter of historical fact. Do you have any other candidates in mind? The only recent one is Aknathen as I mentioned. Have your historical knowledge in order before you venture into a discussion on the subject. There's a reason I never get into a discussion on auto mechanics: I know nothing about it. And the intelligent alternative to monotheism is of course: No-theism.

I would recommend  "The Source" by James Michener,an excellent run through of the history of the Jews.

Pixie old boy- you dont seem to see the contradiction in what you are saying. I didnt back up my assertion that The Jews did not "invent" monotheism for 2 reasons:

1. You wrote:

Reed,that the Jews invented monotheism is a matter of historical fact. Do you have any other candidates in mind? The only recent one is Aknathen as I mentioned.

You can't have two originals. Rather puts a downer on your statement of fact!

2. There are hundreds of millions of Christians and Jews out there who will tell you that their GOD "invented" monotheism, by dint of being "The One True God." A moot point so to speak but valid nonetheless. Religion and Fact now there's dodgy ground if I ever saw it!

By the way, just so you know,I am an atheist. I was EDUCATED at a Catholic Boys Grammar School and if you wanna play at my degrees bigger than yours laddie, bring it on!




Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 06:45

Reed,that the Jews invented monotheism is a matter of historical fact. Do you have any other candidates in mind? The only recent one is Aknathen as I mentioned. Have your historical knowledge in order before you venture into a discussion on the subject. There's a reason I never get into a discussion on auto mechanics: I know nothing about it. And the intelligent alternative to monotheism is of course: No-theism.

I would recommend  "The Source" by James Michener,an excellent run through of the history of the Jews.

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
sigod View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2004 at 06:34

Big Brother??? Strange that the term has gone from the great, dark, overseer in Orwell's 1984 to a rather tedious reality TV show.

Question; is there a big brother TV show in the states?

I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 20:45

We all know that Europe's one world government plan is being fronted by the Illuminati...Big Brother has you by the throat my friends

Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 20:22
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

There is truth in what you say.However, how many Muslims agreed with the Fatwah but didnt go public in the media with it? Most fundimentalist Muslims I would guess! So why dont you just stop all Muslims from entering America and hedge all bets.You see what I am trying to say here?

How many American Presidents have actually signed a Foreign Leader's death warrant, so the CIA could go and bump him off? In effect murdering them theirself. What is the difference? Not all of them were dictators and tyrants.

Double standards?Confused

Your double standards have no relation to one another, nor do they give the correct context to even be considered.  But then, that doesn't really surprise me.

Anyway, I have friends and neighbors that are Iranians.. and just came back from Iran from visiting for a few weeks... and they dress like muslims.. and have very muslim names... Mohamed ... and got into this country just fine...

Wow.. now isn't that amazing?? I guess their names didn't pop up on some terrorist watch list... created in Europe, by a European organization....hmmmm?

THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 19:37
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

There is truth in what you say.However, how many Muslims agreed with the Fatwah but didnt go public in the media with it? Most fundimentalist Muslims I would guess! So why dont you just stop all Muslims from entering America and hedge all bets.You see what I am trying to say here?

How many American Presidents have actually signed a Foreign Leader's death warrant, so the CIA could go and bump him off? In effect murdering them theirself. What is the difference? Not all of them were dictators and tyrants.

Double standards?Confused

Not at all- I wouldn't feel too safe around any of the surviving US Presidents either 

But nobody has a right to travel wherever they want...you depend upon the goodwill of the destination. This isn't totally an Arab vs. Caucasian thing; this is more like scared people keeping the chain on when answering their door after a break-in. It's too bad we can't keep the doors unlocked anymore, but it's not an inherently racist thing to be nervous about specific people who have advocated violence in the past. Fearing the outsider is a fundamental human attribute that motivates each one of us in subtle or overt ways every day of our lives, no matter how cosmopolitan or civilized we think we are. Do I wish everyone could travel everywhere they want? Sure...I'd love to see quite a few historical locations in the Middle East. Would I make an issue out of the difficulties in doing that right now? Only if I was purposefully blinding myself to reality.

I'm not being naive; there's a lot of racism in the US, and a lot more anti-Arab sentiment since 9/11. I'm not advocating rounding Arab-Americans up for 'questioning' (remeber that glorious World War II? It had a pretty dark side for Asian Americans, especially on the West Coast). However, now is a bad time to try to convince people that an Islamic adherent (which I think is an overly fair description of the ex-Cat-man) poses no more danger to them than anyone else.

I don't believe there can ever be real peace and understanding between people of dramatically different faiths if those religious teachings inherently flame the primal fires of our predjudices- which all major religions do to some extent. Christianity and Islam have been at odds for longer than most of us can trace our ancestors; saying that denying entry to an advocate of violence is a moral weakness on our part just strikes me as either too close to unthinking kneejerk liberalism or too far from realistic expectations. I don't really think he posed any threat, but I also don't think that there's anything wrong with refusing to let him in.

 

Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 19:10
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Marillion-Cat Stevens=theological debate

Of course the Cat Stevens issue is a theological debate, Greg. Instead of Reds UnderThe Bed you've now got Saracens.You just dont get it do you?

I bet you are looking under your cot right now arent you!Wink

 

Reed Lover...you really think I am just a big simpleton! I understand the whole Cat Stevens thing. Theological debates just get messy..I was trying to take some of the seriousness out of the conversation because I did not like where it was heading.....

You didnt like where it was going?

And they give you the vote?????????

You are one mean spirited bloke...aren't ya!!

Reed Lover doesn't get enough hugs

 

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 18:56
Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Marillion-Cat Stevens=theological debate

Of course the Cat Stevens issue is a theological debate, Greg. Instead of Reds UnderThe Bed you've now got Saracens.You just dont get it do you?

I bet you are looking under your cot right now arent you!Wink

 

Reed Lover...you really think I am just a big simpleton! I understand the whole Cat Stevens thing. Theological debates just get messy..I was trying to take some of the seriousness out of the conversation because I did not like where it was heading.....

You didnt like where it was going?

And they give you the vote?????????




Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 18:47
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Marillion-Cat Stevens=theological debate

Of course the Cat Stevens issue is a theological debate, Greg. Instead of Reds UnderThe Bed you've now got Saracens.You just dont get it do you?

I bet you are looking under your cot right now arent you!Wink

Reed Lover...you really think I am just a big simpleton! I understand the whole Cat Stevens thing. Theological debates just get messy..I was trying to take some of the seriousness out of the conversation because I did not like where it was heading.....

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 17:54

There is truth in what you say.However, how many Muslims agreed with the Fatwah but didnt go public in the media with it? Most fundimentalist Muslims I would guess! So why dont you just stop all Muslims from entering America and hedge all bets.You see what I am trying to say here?

How many American Presidents have actually signed a Foreign Leader's death warrant, so the CIA could go and bump him off? In effect murdering them theirself. What is the difference? Not all of them were dictators and tyrants.

Double standards?Confused

 




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 17:43

The religious (can you really call it 'bordering on racist', DH?) part does not really affect me one way or the other; the renounced-Cat Stevens made statements amounting to death threats against an author. Until he recants those statements and shows some indication that he's come to his senses, I feel that any country in the world has the right to deny him entrance.

Do I feel more nervous around followers of Mohammed since 9/11? Well, anyone could be a member of any religion- it doesn't show on their face. Do I get uneasy around people of obviously Arab descent? To be honest...sometimes, but it has more to do with an unpleasant taxicab ride in Chicago seven years ago than it does with the World Trade Center bombings. As we were speeding towards McCormick Place, the driver spouted such an incredible tirade of violent anti-Americanism that I became understandably eager to end the trip- and passing a taxi which had crashed and burned conjured up images of suicide crashes by fanatics. And just to repeat, this was many years before 9/11. However, the young Arab family that I run into every few days at the convenience store on the corner (wow, a paragraph full of stereotypes totally grounded in specific personal experience!) is extemely nice and funny and much more courteous than most whiteys I run into on a daily basis.

On the other hand, the previously-changed-his-name-once-already-to-Cat Stevens, no matter what his ethnic background is (Greek and Swedish Londoner, BTW), is an unstable and dangerous-sounding individual. You pay a price for speaking your mind (already some members of this forum exhibit predjudice against me for things I have posted, and I recognize that I've earned it) and the price for saying such ridiculously violent things is that some doors are now closed to him. He's backpedaled since then, neither apologizing nor recanting, but also seeing how his support for the fatwah directly impedes his pose as a supporter of humanitarian causes. And those who feel that we have expressed predjudice unjustly continue to soften the historical focus in favor of the perceived victims.

 

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 17:30

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Marillion-Cat Stevens=theological debate

Of course the Cat Stevens issue is a theological debate, Greg. Instead of Reds UnderThe Bed you've now got Saracens.You just dont get it do you?

I bet you are looking under your cot right now arent you!Wink



Edited by Reed Lover



Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2004 at 14:08
Marillion-Cat Stevens=theological debate
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.