Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Can anyone tell me why P.Floyd is prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCan anyone tell me why P.Floyd is prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:57

Let's drop the notions of long complex arrangements, complexity and all the other nonsense that tends to go with describing prog for a moment.

Prog Rock is not about being hideously complex, or being able to improvise for hours on end -although Pink Floyd more than demonstrated their abilities on their earliest output. In fact, if you think about it, everything after Meddle was one concept per album - the Wall being the ultimate consumation of coherent concept-building.

The biggest problem with Pink Floyd as a Prog Rock band that I see is modern perception of Prog Rock - which seems to have little or nothing to do with actual Prog Rock, and more to do with casual sources of reference like Wikipedia, which is one of the worst sources of information about music that I have ever seen - simply because of all the opinionated and factually inaccurate articles therein.

Prog Rock is defined by the bands who were there first - the bands who defined Prog Rock.

Pink Floyd are one of those bands.

That's why they're Prog

 

Back to Top
SaintVitus View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: September 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:15
Originally posted by Losendos Losendos wrote:

 

 

    They have always been considered prog and are one of the seminal bands. Listed to Atom Heart Mother and Meddle and you will see why. Creatiivity dropped later on but this seems to be a problem for all bands before long.



I can't agree....at least untill the departure of Waters they were very creative - Animals and The Wall are both Masterpieces though they are musically completely different
Space Is Deep
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:12
 Pink floyd is as much progg as Bob Dylan is to country western
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:06

 

 

    They have always been considered prog and are one of the seminal bands. Listed to Atom Heart Mother and Meddle and you will see why. Creatiivity dropped later on but this seems to be a problem for all bands before long.

How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:05

They were instrumentle in pushing rock music away from comformaty along with a lot of other bands.

Yes and PF both started out as Psycodelic bands but wheras Yes advanced to there symphonic sound from The Yes Album onwords, PF maintaned a semblence of their roots.

Personally I think Animals, WYWH and The Wall are three of the progiest albums about.

Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 06:57
I'm a floyd fan, but they are limited to playing slower prog. Cool mellow band, but not in my top 10
Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 06:14

They innovated. See albums like Umma Gumma and Atom Heart Mother for details.

Incidentally, I don't like Pink Floyd very much.

Back to Top
krusty View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 06:06
I agree with everthing The Miracle said above.
Nice one



Edited by krusty
Back to Top
samhob View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 237
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 05:46

prog or not, they are the best

Back to Top
BiGi View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 01 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 05:23
They are successful in creating moods and conjuring images and sensations: you see the story they are telling right before your eyes.
And they have always experimented new sounds and effects to paint the sound picture they have in mind (one for all, the voice-synth merger in the verses of Sheep)
A flower?

Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 05:21
^ The masses dont consider Floyd prog, thats why they like them. I do consider them prog rock, and thats why I  listen to them..

Edited by Blacksword
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
SaintVitus View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: September 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 05:18
Originally posted by viperjr98 viperjr98 wrote:

I never considered Pink Floyd prog. 



That's A Sin!
Space Is Deep
Back to Top
pero View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 05:06

PF are milestones of Prog and psyhodelia.

Comparing them to Rush makes no sence.

Listen to Atom heart mother and Ummagumma before you say they are more rock and roll than prog.

I don't like some of their albums (Wall, Delicate sound.., Devision bell), but they made some great ones  (Atom heart mother, Pipper at the gates of down, Medlle, Animals, Dark side of the moon).

 

Back to Top
bobo View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 29 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 04:55
being inventive isn't enough to be prog - Dylan was inventive, the beatles were inventive, does that make them prog? hell, punk was inventive! it's not right to say that they're prog 'cause they did things that weren't done before. personally, I don't get they're thing either. besides the fact that I'm not excited about they're music (it's rather plain to me), I don't see what's prog in them. I'm with viperjr98 on this one. it's just a bunch of rock songs, usually slow ones, with odd space sounds. so what?
the contracts of my youth expire
Back to Top
nick63 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 24 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 66
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 04:40
The Pinks themself are speaking about Rock & Roll...

But yeah if I must but them in a box it's definitely Prog.


Splendid research Miracle!
Nick
from the lovely South of the Netherlands
Back to Top
transend View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 876
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 00:30
Listen to 'Dogs' or 'Shine on..' about as prog as it gets....
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 00:19
Thanks
Back to Top
cucacola54 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 1729
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 00:14
^^^ good job Miracle

Edited by cucacola54
Most listened albums last week

Back to Top
FragileDT View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1485
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 00:13
Wow. Well thank you Miracle that about sums it up.
One likes to believe
In the freedom of music
But glittering prizes
And endless Compromises
Shatter the illusion
Of integrity
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 13 2005 at 00:09

If you listened to Dark Side or the later albums starting with The Wall, your description is correct. But if you listen to stuff from Piper to Obscured By Clouds, and Wish You/Animals, you will see long compositions, complex arrangements, and all other characteristics of prog perfectly present. They had long, complex epics like Atom Heart Mother, Echoes, Saucerful Of Secrets, Alan's  Psychedelic Breakfast and Shine On You Crazy Diamond. Animals is a very "prog", extremely complex concept album. They even experimented with avant garde on Ummagumma. Are you sure you heard the right albums? 

Let's look at the PA definition of prog.

  • Long compositions, sometimes running over 20 minutes, with intricate melodies and harmonies that require repeated listening to grasp. These are often described as epics and are the genre's clearest nod to classical music. An early example is the 23-minute "Echoes" by Pink Floyd. Other famous examples include Jethro Tull's "Thick as a Brick" (43 minutes), Yes' "Close to the Edge" (18 minutes) and Genesis' "Supper's Ready" (23 minutes). More recent extreme examples are the 60-minute "Light of Day, Day of Darkness" by Green Carnation and "Garden of Dreams" by The Flower Kings.

I mentioned the epics above.

  • Lyrics that convey intricate and sometimes impenetrable narratives, covering such themes as science fiction, fantasy, history, religion, war, love, and madness.

Pink Floyd were one of the first to experiment with narratives, Barrett and later Waters were great lyricists who covered all these aspects.

  • Concept albums, in which a theme or storyline is explored throughout an entire album in a manner similar to a film or a play. In the days of vinyl, these were usually two-record sets with strikingly designed gatefold sleeves. Famous examples include The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway by Genesis, Tales from Topographic Oceans by Yes, 2112 by Rush, Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall by Pink Floyd, and the more recent Metropolis Part II: Scenes from a Memory by Dream Theater and Snow by Spock's Beard. Aqualung, perhaps the best-known record by Jethro Tull, is often regarded as a concept album due to its recurring themes, but songwriter Ian Anderson has always claimed that the album is just "a bunch of songs".

This point well covered too. Although I think Animals beats these two.

  • Unusual vocal styles and use of multi-part vocal harmonies. See Magma, Robert Wyatt, and Gentle Giant.

Plenty, especially on Animals and The Wall.

  • Prominent use of electronic instrumentation — particularly keyboard instruments such as the organ, piano, Mellotron, and Moog synthesizer, in addition to the usual rock combination of electric guitar, bass and drums.

They used all those instruments, except I'm not sure about Moog and Mellotron. 

  • Use of unusual time signatures, scales, or tunings. Many pieces use multiple time signatures and/or tempi, sometimes concurrently. Solo passages for virtually every instrument, designed to showcase the virtuosity of the player. This is the sort of thing that contributed to the fame of such performers as keyboardist Rick Wakeman and drummer Neil Peart.

PF did amazing drum perfomances, weird guitar and keyboard work on the early albums(watch Live at Pompeii), later it was reduced to more straightfoward, but still as technical and virtuose solos.

  • Inclusion of classical pieces on albums. For example, Yes start their concerts with a taped extract of Stravinsky's Firebird suite, and Emerson Lake and Palmer have performed arrangements of pieces by Copland, Bartók, Moussorgsky, Prokofiev, Janacek, Alberto Ginastera, and often feature quotes from J. S. Bach in lead breaks. Jethro Tull recorded a famous cover of J. S. Bach's "Bouree", in which they turned the classical piece into a "sleazy jazzy night-club song", according to Ian Anderson. Marillion started concerts with Rossini's La Gazza Ladra (The Thieving Magpie). Symphony X has included parts by, or inspired by, Beethoven, Holst and Mozart.

They didn't have that one, although Atom Heart Mother is a classical piece of its own.

  • An aesthetic linking the music with visual art, a trend started by The Beatles with Sgt. Pepper's and enthusiastically embraced during the prog heyday. Some bands became as well-known for the art direction of their albums as for their sound, with the "look" integrated into the band's overall musical identity. This led to fame for particular artists and design studios, most notably Roger Dean, whose paintings and logo design for Yes are so essential to the band's identity they could be said to serve the same function as corporate branding. Hipgnosis became equally famous for their unusual sleeves for Pink Floyd, often featuring experimental photography quite innovative for the time (two men shaking hands, one of whom is in flames, on the cover of Wish You Were Here). H.R. Giger's painting for Emerson Lake and Palmer's Brain Salad Surgery is one of the most famous album sleeves ever produced.

The most amazing works of Storm are PF sleeves.

 

All points except for one covered. Need any more proof?

 



Edited by The Miracle
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.297 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.