Your Top 10 Metal Albums of All-Time |
Post Reply | Page <12345 6> |
Author | |||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
All metal is a form of rock, of course. Just like all rock (and metal) is a form of rhythm and blues. That is, if you go by the principle that any style that arose from an earlier style *is* still that "parent" style. I just think that for the sake of describing the music in a useful way, it can make sense to sometimes break this chain of stylistic inheritance and say that some new style is now sufficiently different from its roots that it can be seen as a separate main genre. Doesn't mean that it came from nothing, just that it is so radically different that it would be confusing to see it as a subgenre. |
|||
Stressed Cheese
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 16 2022 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
One thing that complicates things a little I think is that between Black Sabbath's early stuff and Sad Wings of Destiny, there really isn't anything that's widely accepted as metal to my knowledge. That's a gap of half a decade. Ok, we can thank Gull Records that Rocka Rolla turned out that tame, but still. Compare that to most genres, where 5 years after the first widely accepted album you might already be in decline (the bulk of classic prog rock was released within years of ITCOTCK).
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65258 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
^ I like that tridimensional thinking
|
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 35804 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I have considered metal to be a form of rock. A form of rock that grew out of classic blues-based hard rock.. in a way it could be called post-rock, and then post-metal could be called post-post rock. I once was told that metal has nothing to do with rock, which I thought bizarre. I wonder if any thing metal developed which has no rock roots. Of course earlier metal bands influenced later metal bands, and perhaps some stuff that sounds metal could have come directly out of, say, a natural evolution of Chinese Opera rather than a metal take on Chinese Opera.
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65258 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Citing Metallica as the first serious break from trad. Metal is a very reasonable assertion-- Some here will recall member Certified's conclusion that it was this band that broke from the "Swing" of the Blues itself ~ the rhythmic basis of most Rock music ~ giving modern Metal an approach that was significantly different . |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I did not mean this one album in particular. I mean Kill 'em All as one very well known (and over-hyped) album that was part of a new wave of metal which emerged from the NWOBHM. I'm sure there were underground bands that were quite heavy in the 70s. Again, I am saying that there was this early phase in the 70s that lead to the NWOBHM which then led to a third phase of metal in the 80s. With each phase the bands turned farther away from Rock/Blues, and I would say that on albums like Kill 'em All, there was finally sufficient difference that Metal could be said to have become a new main genre. As for Motörhead having been speed metal - yes, historically that is correct. By the historical definition, Speed King by Deep Purple is Speed Metal. Having grown up in the 80s, that sounds ridiculous to me. It only makes sense when you accept the division between classic/proto/early metal, all of which was still rooted in Rock and which Speed Metal was part of, and modern metal, which then had its own bands that played fast and were called Power Metal, and sometimes also Speed Metal. Like it or not, but musically there is a striking difference between most post-NWOBHM metal bands and classic bands of the 70s that were authentically called "... Metal". Of course you can put it all under one umbrella if you insist, but that becomes quite confusing, and as I pointed out, not even metal-archives.com do it. Or you make some sort of division between classic (rock-based) and modern (metal-based), as I am suggesting. It's up to you
Exactly. this "first wave metal" was still "just" heavy rock. Some really awesome releases, one of my absolute favorite albums of all time are among them (e.g. Deep Purple - Machine Head). But still firmly rooted in Rock. Yes, Doom Metal is metal, too - but on the Sabbath debut only one track is Doom Metal, and still rooted in Rock to a great extent. I see these 70s hard rock albums as Rock. The release title "Deep Purple IN ROCK" is a clue
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65258 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
All rock [L. Richard, Elvis, Beatles] comes from the blues and all Heavy Blues [Faces, Cream, Beck/Stewart] comes from the blues and all Heavy Rock [Zeppelin,Sabbath] comes from the Blues and all Heavy Metal [Priest,Scorpions,Ozzy] comes from the Blues and therefore all earrly Progressive Metal [Maiden,Voivod,Yngwie] must come from the Blues. But again I ask; why did a simple form of Black American culture music which became a white kid's garage jam become so fully varied & iterated ? --- |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18269 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I didn't say there weren't any. Yes, those two qualify and of course Black Sabbath even though apparently they didn't like the term.
|
|||
Nogbad_The_Bad
Forum & Site Admin Group RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Offline Points: 20847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Thank you |
|||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
|||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Kill Em ALl the beginning of metal? OMG. Are you serious? Metallica didn't even release the first thrash much less metal. Both Sodom and Holy Moses released thrash metal before Metallica. Bands like Sir Lord Baltimore were designated heavy metal as early as 1970. Much heavier than Sabbath, Zeppelin and DP. Kill Em All came out in 1983 the same year as Hellhammber's blackened thrash. As far as NWOBHM most certainly metal, the first album came from Quartz in 1977. Several bands jumped on board and led to Iron Maiden's 1980 debut. NOT hard rock anymore. Motorhead was clearly speed metal as was Running Wild, Atomkraft and Venom well before Metallica. So your claim is incorrect. 70s heavier rock is early metal. I call it first wave metal. Doom metal is metal too and Black Sabbath fit the bill perfectly. Yeah, 70s hard rock and heavy metal are very difficult to distinguish but there were some metal bands then. |
|||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
|||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 11621 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
It seems better to me to talk about the '70s Proto-Metal as the beginning of the '80s Metal.
|
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
My honourable mentions Voivod (CAN) - Nothingface (1989) Soundgarden (USA) - Badmotorfinger (1991) Aesma Daeva (USA) - The Eros of Frigid Beauty (2001) OSI (USA) - Office Of Strategic Influence (2003) Om (USA) - Conference Of The Birds (2006) |
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Not sure I want to qualify anything 70's from Sab, Zep & Purple as metal, let alone "Heavy Metal". And TBH, I lost interest & track of most metal acts in 82/3 - and "rock" in general (in favour of jazz) in 84/5. I'd rank three or four as my "faves": Rising Sad Wings Iron Maiden (debut) Heaven & Hell (that's an 80's album, when they became NWOBHMB) . |
|||
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But interesting to hear about your considerations concerning the relation between Metal and Rock, as I've been wondering about the opinions today in that matter. |
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I get why Highway Star links to quite a lot of later metal stuff and Purple are oft listed as a key influence of metal bands. Led Zep, don't really hear it. Hard Rock for sure as said above.
|
|||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21174 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
^ no, it’s all Hard Rock to me (or in Trower’s case, Blues).
|
|||
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 09 2019 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 11608 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I don't think Motorehad were really about albums. They had some tremendous singles that broke into the charts adn even got airplay. Only Maiden and maybe Judas Priest (the earliest metal band) were bigger on the metal scene around late sevnties early eighties. Then Def Leppard blotted out the sun with Hysteria although I only really liked their earlier stuff. I've not devoted much time to listening to Heavy Metal , its so bloody boring much of the time. Maiden were perhaps the first metal band to realise you could have an arty element to it although they admitted a heavy prog influence around the time of Seventh Son of A Seventh Son. Even with Maiden though I can quite happily just listen to Powerslave which is virtually the only metal album that would get anywhere near a personal top ten of all time covering any genre.
Edited by richardh - July 16 2023 at 06:39 |
|||
Post Reply | Page <12345 6> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |