Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rush vs The Beatles
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRush vs The Beatles
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 27282930>
Poll Question: Who do you prefer ?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
182 [43.65%]
235 [56.35%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 17:50
Originally posted by birdwithteeth11 birdwithteeth11 wrote:


Personally I'm not doubting that The Beatles were influential, they just aren't my taste


My thoughts.
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 17:32
Beatles = likely the most innovative and groundbreaking bands of any generation's time, and likely will be in all of history.

My preference - Rush Clown
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 17:21
^no prob, and glad you understand. I'm no big fan neither. The only album I really pick by them, if I really listen to them, it is Abbey Road, the rest meh, but I must admit they are highly influential, blah blah blah...
Back to Top
horsewithteeth11 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 17:19
Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

Originally posted by birdwithteeth11 birdwithteeth11 wrote:

This may seem like a silly or ignorant question to some people, but could someone please explain to me what exactly make The Beatles 'progressive' in any sense? I've never seen them as progressive in any way except for the occasional song played in an odd time signature, although I'd appreciate it if someone could enlighten me.
 
it's not a silly question, but for example, check the music that mostly groups played in 1965 and then listen carefully to albums like Rubber Soul and Revolver and in fact none mainstream group was doing that the Beatles done.

Alright, that definitely helps my understanding, as well as what cacho said. Personally I'm not doubting that The Beatles were influential, they just aren't my taste. Thanks for clearing it up for me though.Smile
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 16:52
As much as I love The Beatles I prefer Rush.   
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 15:27
I don't think I can vote in this poll either.  Two bands that I really love. 
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Carlos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2004
Location: Ecuador
Status: Offline
Points: 284 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 15:17
Two different eras from two bands I really love...No vote this time....
Democracy=A form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people...

Back to Top
Frippertron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 387 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 15:06
Bit of a daft poll this one.
 
Might as well have put Beethoven v Can of worms. 
The Cheerful Insanity of Prog Rock
Back to Top
splyu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 06 2008
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 316 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 14:48
Originally posted by rushaholic rushaholic wrote:

I don't think anyone questions the fact that without The Beatles, we wouldn't have a lot of the music that we do have today.  No question that they are one of the greatest.

But, I prefer RUSH!

Ditto.
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 14:25
Insane poll! XD

Rush.
Back to Top
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 14:10
Ermm Wacko    
Back to Top
rushaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 13 2005
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1140 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 13:53
I don't think anyone questions the fact that without The Beatles, we wouldn't have a lot of the music that we do have today.  No question that they are one of the greatest.

But, I prefer RUSH!
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:58
Originally posted by birdwithteeth11 birdwithteeth11 wrote:

This may seem like a silly or ignorant question to some people, but could someone please explain to me what exactly make The Beatles 'progressive' in any sense? I've never seen them as progressive in any way except for the occasional song played in an odd time signature, although I'd appreciate it if someone could enlighten me.
 
it's not a silly question, but for example, check the music that mostly groups played in 1965 and then listen carefully to albums like Rubber Soul and Revolver and in fact none mainstream group was doing that the Beatles done.




Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32552 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:58
The poll question asked my preference.  Therefore the "more influential" question is moot. I find The Beatles boring.  Good, but boring.

Sorry.
Back to Top
Lionheart View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 106 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:55
This is a strange poll, folks. But, I'll indulge.

Beatles far and away. They were responsible for so much, I would probably put them at the top of any Rock and Roll poll, regardless of "genre".
Back to Top
febus View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:50
Without them, we wouldn't be here i think
Back to Top
febus View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:46
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Originally posted by Alberto Muñoz Alberto Muñoz wrote:

Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

I love the Beatles, but my nick is not Beatlesfan4. 
 
It is actually sort of funny that you have this poll.  A couple of years ago, the local sports talk radio station was going through a period of time where they did a bunch of NCAA tournament brackets with 64 teams for various items.  The rock band item featured the Beatles as the number 1 seed and Rush as the 16th seed in their bracket.  Random callers would be asked to pick their favorite band from which ever 2 they would be asked and the winner would move on.  The DJs did hold a couple veto votes though.  I didn't call in, but boy would they have been in for a shock if I had had this game as my choice.  That would have been 1 veto used up very quickly.  LOL
 
And where's Rushfan number 1, 2 and 3?LOLWink
 
That would be Alex, Geddy, and Neil.
 
OooooH!!! i thought that was KBT, Naturalscience and Movingpic07  LOLWink
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:30
Hmmm, are you in some kind of contest for weirdest poll pairings? LOL
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:14
Originally posted by birdwithteeth11 birdwithteeth11 wrote:

This may seem like a silly or ignorant question to some people, but could someone please explain to me what exactly make The Beatles 'progressive' in any sense? I've never seen them as progressive in any way except for the occasional song played in an odd time signature, although I'd appreciate it if someone could enlighten me.


Prog they're not, and no one has said they are. PROTO-Prog is something different. As you said, they had odd time signatures, mixed genres, use of  "new" instruments on rock music: Mellotron and Moog. "Epic", though it's divided in 7 or 8 songs(Abbey Road side 2)
Back to Top
Floydoid View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 02 2007
Location: Planet Prog
Status: Offline
Points: 1887 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2008 at 12:05
The Beatles, because they got going at a time when rock & roll was in the doldrums, and their influence on the future development on modern music is incalculable.  You can't say that about many artists.
Is it any wonder that the monkey's confused?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 27282930>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.469 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.