Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 08:35 |
This subject (the original post) is fun to discuss but eventually it's time to stand up, state your opinion, and sit back down. Has Earth been visited by any alien life form? I say no, we haven't. There is no proof of a visitation and there is no proof of a cover up of a visitation.
I'm originally from Missouri which is the "Show Me" state. If you want me to believe that something is true you have to show me that it's true.
|
|
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 07:38 |
Dean wrote:
TeleStrat wrote:
If earthlings have to rely on 'real time travel' to explore space then we may as well just stay home and spend the billions (or trillions) of dollars on something more important.Without any major discoveries in alternative forms of travel (like worm holes, time warps or even warp drive) we're not going anywhere. Why are we going anyway? What do we hope to find? Our galaxy has a few hundred billion stars and planets and who knows how many galaxies there are in the universe? What were we thinking when we decided to explore space? |
We cannot discover what is not there to be discovered.
Ignoring for a moment everything I have said about the practical impossibility of FTL (inc theoretical wormholes, fictional time warps and warp-drives).
If interstellar travel is measured in thousands of years then inter-galaxy travel is measured in millions of years. The nearest galaxy to our own is 28,000ly away, (i.e., 264,900,000,000,000,000km), so even at light-speed it would take 28,000 years to get there (at 1x light-speed it would take 2.1 million years to reach Andromeda) so once we start talking about visiting other galaxies in the Universe then even FTL travel becomes problematic to a short-lived species such as ourselves.
What we can investigate and explore is our local neighbourhood, and there are enough unknowns contained within that to keep us occupied for many years to come. |
yes to this and your previous post ... which is why I always found the ufo thing to be a lark. Like all things fanciful they are fun to dwell on and it makes us more interesting than we really are the best we can do with the technology we're ever likely to develop - is to colonize the moon - which is a depressing thought to say the least. How uninhabitable would the earth have to be before we thought that living on a dead rock would be a good alternative.
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65416
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 04:08 |
I used to go to a club called Alien Rod's
One also wonders if some of those UFOs in the 90s were early drone tech
Edited by Atavachron - January 29 2015 at 04:19
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 03:59 |
Quite, there are certainly several magnitudes more video cameras around now than in the 90s and the technology of those cameras has improved beyond recognition. This means that there should be even more sightings, not less.
And I think that is indicative of the "unidentified" being a lot easier to identify with modern technology than it was with the emergent technology of the 90s - a case in point being the "alien rods" that were the result of an artefact of the video camera technology.
Edited by Dean - January 29 2015 at 04:00
|
What?
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65416
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 03:56 |
Where are all the increasing spates of sightings that should've been occurring over the past few years? The 90s were full of unknown craft caught on video, now it seems like a trickle.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 02:32 |
It takes about 1 year to get to Mars, which I think puts the space-craft's speed at something like 9,000 km/hr, but this is not the fastest speed a space probe has achieved. But yes, those are pedestrian compared to the speeds required for interstellar travel. I would define "real time" as the time taken to move any mass over a distance regardless of speed.
I cannot accept "maybe we're not supposed to" because of what that implies. I will merely say that there are things that we would like to exist that simply do not exist so we can never discover them, and I would class FTL travel and perpetual motion as things we would like to exist that probably do not.
|
What?
|
|
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 02:03 |
When I say "real time' I'm referring to the actual speed that our space crafts are able to go now. For example, the time it took for the Apollo missions to travel to the moon and back. At that rate of speed, any further space exploration is not possible. How long did it take a probe to get to Mars? I totally agree that that the war on drugs has been one of the biggest wastes of money in my lifetime. And after spending all of that money the drug situation is many times worse than it was forty years ago. The discovery thing is just my way of saying that I think there are secrets in the universe that we have not yet discovered but, maybe we're not supposed to.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 01:39 |
TeleStrat wrote:
I understand exactly what you are saying about distances and the time it takes to travel those distances.That is why I feel that if we are limited to 'real time' travel then why are we even bothering? |
I was not including FTL speeds as part of 'real time' travelling since to travel faster than light would involve moving out of real time.
So by 'non real time' travel do you mean (near) instantaneous movement of a mass over a distance?
TeleStrat wrote:
I came across a chart the other day that listed the annual space exploration budgets for about twenty countries. The total amount was staggering and that's annually. |
The total amount of money laying idle in off-shore bank accounts is staggering, then once you start talking about any cash-spend on a national or global scale the numbers become staggering- the global spend on space exploration is one quarter of what was spent on the war on drugs. The total spend over its 50 year history by the USA is roughly half the USA military cost of being in Afganistan for 10 years.
TeleStrat wrote:
I do not believe that we have discovered everything that exists in this field. |
That is undoubtedly true.
TeleStrat wrote:
Everything that we know about anything didn't exist until someone discovered it. |
And that is also undeniably true, in that we did not know that America existed before we discovered it, but it did exist before then.
However, not everything we speculate that can exist does exist or ever can exist.
|
What?
|
|
manofmystery
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2008
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4335
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 22:18 |
Alright, I've stayed silent long enough. It's time I owned up to it. Every single UFO sighting has just been me holding up a stick with a paper plate attached to a string at the end.
|
Time always wins.
|
|
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 20:37 |
I understand exactly what you are saying about distances and the time it takes to travel those distances. That is why I feel that if we are limited to 'real time' travel then why are we even bothering? I came across a chart the other day that listed the annual space exploration budgets for about twenty countries. The total amount was staggering and that's annually.
I do not believe that we have discovered everything that exists in this field. Everything that we know about anything didn't exist until someone discovered it.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 19:51 |
TeleStrat wrote:
If earthlings have to rely on 'real time travel' to explore space then we may as well just stay home and spend the billions (or trillions) of dollars on something more important.Without any major discoveries in alternative forms of travel (like worm holes, time warps or even warp drive) we're not going anywhere. Why are we going anyway? What do we hope to find? Our galaxy has a few hundred billion stars and planets and who knows how many galaxies there are in the universe? What were we thinking when we decided to explore space? |
We cannot discover what is not there to be discovered.
Ignoring for a moment everything I have said about the practical impossibility of FTL (inc theoretical wormholes, fictional time warps and warp-drives).
If interstellar travel is measured in thousands of years then inter-galaxy travel is measured in millions of years. The nearest galaxy to our own is 28,000ly away, (i.e., 264,900,000,000,000,000km), so even at light-speed it would take 28,000 years to get there (at 1x light-speed it would take 2.1 million years to reach Andromeda) so once we start talking about visiting other galaxies in the Universe then even FTL travel becomes problematic to a short-lived species such as ourselves.
What we can investigate and explore is our local neighbourhood, and there are enough unknowns contained within that to keep us occupied for many years to come.
|
What?
|
|
Argonaught
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 04 2012
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 1413
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 18:45 |
[QUOTE=Dean]Whichever way you slice it interstellar travel is a no-no [/QUOTE]
And, as we all well know, we have no adequate means of propulsion to even go to the likes of Mars and back. All we have been able to use is the reactive force, generated by expelling some matter from the stern of a (space)ship, whether it be a chemical rocket or an ion thruster.
Edited by Argonaught - January 28 2015 at 18:45
|
|
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 18:41 |
If earthlings have to rely on 'real time travel' to explore space then we may as well just stay home and spend the billions (or trillions) of dollars on something more important. Without any major discoveries in alternative forms of travel (like worm holes, time warps or even warp drive) we're not going anywhere. Why are we going anyway? What do we hope to find? Our galaxy has a few hundred billion stars and planets and who knows how many galaxies there are in the universe? What were we thinking when we decided to explore space?
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 16964
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 18:09 |
Indeed. Now, she must rest.
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 17:36 |
That's Leviathans for you.
|
What?
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Online
Points: 16964
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 17:32 |
Moya has little problem with starburst
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 17:23 |
Whichever way you slice it interstellar travel is a no-no.
At subluminal speeds the only viable methods of travel are multi-generation ark-ships, which sound great in theory, but would not be viable in practice due to the time these vessels will take to cross the vast distances between solar systems. They would simply wear out before they had completed the journey and anything needed to maintain, repair and/or rebuild these ships would have to be brought with them since there is nowhere to stop along the way to gather raw materials or make repairs. If you are travelling the 37,842,113,600,000km (i.e., 4ly) from a planet in one solar system to a planet in the neighbouring solar system then there is nothing in the space between them to stop at.
If the ship is travelling at say 1 million km per hour then that is a 4,320 year journey - in this time on earth we have gone from building pyramids to sending probes to the outer solar system.
So another thing to consider is whether the lifeform that arrived at the destination would bear any resemblance to the one that embarked on the voyage. Not just sociologically, but if the speeds are slower than 1 million km/hr (which is quite probably) then also biologically. After a hundred thousand years in space, the species of "alien" that reached Earth would not be representative of the technologically-advanced lifeform that built and launched the arc-ships. There is also their psychological state to think about - after living for generations in a confined environment within a limited gene-pool they'd be quite insane by any standard you care to apply.
All that aside, if they found Earth to be habitable to their physiology then you can pretty much guarantee that their only thought would be of colonisation because for them it was a one-way trip and the home-world would be a distant mythological legend. They would not see us as the native population but as a planet-wide infestation in much the same way we regard roaches and termites in domestic dwellings.
FTL travel, whether by wormhole or warping spacetime, is a science fiction "get-out-of-jail" free card that tends to collapse under even moderate scientific scrutiny, nothing would survive the energies involved. The vessel is part of the space being warped or bent or distorted so it too will be warped or bent or distorted so the concept of travelling through it is as much a fictional fantasy as travelling to another world through a looking glass or the back of a wardrobe. You can travel through a black hole, wormhole or space warp in much the same way as a camel can pass through the eye of a needle - you just need a giant blender and a huge syringe, and then a lot of time, patience and luck in piecing together what arrived on the other side as a fully functional camel.
Edited by Dean - January 28 2015 at 17:27
|
What?
|
|
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 13:22 |
Blacksword wrote:
TeleStrat wrote:
I agree with you Blacksword about the government keeping something like that a secret. If there was such a place as Area 51 and if there were three alien bodies discovered at a crash site the government would almost have to keep it a secret for reasons stated above. In a situation like that people cannot be trusted to act reasonably or responsibly. I'm sorry, they just can't.
By the way Walton Street, my favorite tennis shoes are my Chuck Taylor All Stars high tops in camouflage. |
I think Area 51 is real enough. The bit about the dead aliens I'm sure is non sense. Probably just a test centre for new aviation technology. |
The aviation test center theory is certainly a believable one and would explain the secrecy. I have no idea how the dead alien story got started but it could probably be traced back to the tinfoil hat people. The fact remains that if any government had any kind of proof at all it is best that they keep it a secret for the social impact reasons that we've discussed.
|
|
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 13:20 |
TeleStrat wrote:
Walton Street wrote:
i have 30 pairs of converse, several different colours ..it's all I've worn since i was a little kid (some of them in the past were not brand name but they were always sneakers) |
Wow...when you find something you like, you stick with it.
|
that could be on my tombstone
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
|
TeleStrat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2014
Location: Norwalk, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 9319
|
Posted: January 28 2015 at 12:56 |
Walton Street wrote:
i have 30 pairs of converse, several different colours ..it's all I've worn since i was a little kid (some of them in the past were not brand name but they were always sneakers) |
Wow...when you find something you like, you stick with it.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.