Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
criticdrummer94
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 16 2011
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 431
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 04:39 |
Queen's debut is a little better and more proggy than Rush is. Why you all making the cover art such a big deal
|
MY IDOLS
|
|
gents
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 30 2010
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 89
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 03:53 |
Rush doesn't stand a chance. Queen is way way better.
|
|
cstack3
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Online
Points: 7272
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 00:40 |
Queen for me as well. Queen II is a remarkable album that seems forgotten by many.
And, don't forget, "no synthesizers"!!
|
|
Wanorak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4574
|
Posted: October 13 2011 at 00:34 |
Queen for miles for me.
|
A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
|
|
Alitare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 08 2008
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 3595
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:50 |
Rush's debut looks like a Batman TV show caption, and Queen's debut is just a big dump of purple with some guy standing there.
|
|
catfood03
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 785
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:45 |
Horizons wrote:
Queen's cover is good i think, but i haven't heard their debut yet. So no vote. |
Queen's album cover actually improves when shrunk to CD size, as an LP it's becomes more glaring how boring it really is
Edited by catfood03 - October 12 2011 at 21:46
|
|
Horizons
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 20 2011
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 16952
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:43 |
Queen's cover is good i think, but i haven't heard their debut yet. So no vote.
|
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.
|
|
twosteves
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 01 2007
Location: NYC/Rhinebeck
Status: Offline
Points: 4091
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:41 |
one thing they have in common is equally bad album covers lol
|
|
catfood03
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 785
|
Posted: October 12 2011 at 21:28 |
Of these two debuts which do you think is stronger. Both wear their Led Zeppelin admiration on their sleeves and both of these albums were released in (somewhat) close proximity to each other. In my opinion Queen's debut reveals a personality and shows more promise in transcending their influences, while Rush seems to still be "finding their way" on their debut. Plus, song for song, "Queen" is a more exciting record, IMO. What do you think?
Edited by catfood03 - October 12 2011 at 21:29
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.