Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Posted: August 31 2011 at 15:19
Haphazardly.
Though I tend to group everything together by purchase, so I have a section of my room that represents my first CDs and then another that groups the next *enter time period here*, and etc etc. This way I have a rough idea of where something is based on how long I've had it. But I have no groupings by artists/time/color/weight/etc. Though as of late, I have been putting things in those stupid paper sleeve "cases" together to avoid my massive towers of cds from becoming unstable/crushing the CDs in those very unprotective cases.
One day, when I can change the layout of my room, I plan to get big shelves and put everything on there, but I doubt I'll group my artist or anything specific even then.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Joined: March 04 2008
Location: Retirement Home
Status: Offline
Points: 3658
Posted: August 31 2011 at 14:50
James wrote:
So if you buy an album by an artist beginning with A, what do you do, Torodd?
I use the rules as adopted by public archives and libraries + ProgArchives when it comes to archives. A followeb by B. Abs followed by Abt.
I do not go by genre. It is alphabeth, strictly.
I am a bit of a slave when it comes to this rule.
Edit: This is the same rule as Lenin once recommended when he ordered the removal of his enemies from this planet post October revolution. When that is good enough for him, it is good enough for me.
Edited by toroddfuglesteg - August 31 2011 at 14:52
Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20414
Posted: August 31 2011 at 10:50
Abstrakt wrote:
I have serious troubles trying to come up with the ultimate solution when it comes to organizing my CD's.
No solution so far has been 100%. My collection is now over 600 and it never stops growing
HELP!!!
How do you organize yours?
First advice, get some flat shelves without slots.... it makes it easier to slide an album between two others without having to displace them all one by one...
Morningrise wrote:
I separate my shelves into categories. The most important categories I use are:
1-Prog Rock/Jazz
2-Alt Rock/Grunge/Punk
3-Heavy Metal
4-Classic Rock/Hard Rock
And then I try to establish either a certain chronological order between the categories, or subcategories (for example: under Heavy Metal first I have the "Classic Heavy Metal" bands such as Sabbath, Maiden, Priest, then Thrash bands, the Death Metal and so on)
I kind of work that way (by genres), but I also group them by country and then also by who played in what band (The Nice is next to ELP, Trower is next to Procol, Schulze is next to TD, etc...) and inside the artiste's space... it's chronological.
It's kind of a map in my shelves too!!
for example all the Impulse! label New Thing jazz artiste (the Coltrane galaxy if you wish) are all on the same shelf.. which is just above my other jazz (Brubeck, Mingus, etc...) shelf and just below my Bitches Brew shelf (Davis, Weather report, Mahavishnu, RTF, etc...)
Logically Belgium bands are next to French acts (the UZ-AZ link), and not far away from the Dutch acts , all three of whom being relatively close from Cantyerbury bands on an upper shelf... above the Canterbury shelf, you'll find theCrimson, Yes (Bruford link), Genesis, Floyd, etc....
let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
Joined: August 11 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8815
Posted: August 31 2011 at 10:30
I have a variety of music that all means different things to me because my tastes fluctuate, so I sort by context. I have one shelf of roughly pre-prog rock music, and on it, i first put in my collections by favorite artists. The order of artists from top to bottom is roughly how proud I am to own that artists discogaphy, so top shelf has Tears for Fears, Boomtown Rats, etc. Artists where I only have one release are mixed in where there was space.
Next two shelves are mostly prog, art rock, or avant garde, and are sorted similarly. I also had to find space for my growing collections of classical, jazz, metal, and musicals.
Meanwhile, I have a couple shelves of CDs I still need to listen to and an in-rotation section. When I listen to a new cd, it goes in rotation, when I no longer feel like listening it goes into the collection.
Some artists, like Joanna Newsom, Munly, and Venetian Snares don't really have a home, but they are currently in my "in-rotation" pile so I'll figure that out later.
I do re-organize my system constantly, always by esoteric rules and relations between albums/artists, so this system is new. It will be changing again soon because my collection no longer fits in the available shelf space so tonight I am acquiring a new shelf that spins and can hold over 800 CDs.
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Posted: August 31 2011 at 09:37
Slartibartfast wrote:
Adding in a genre level to the sort is too much work for me. My collection is all one big happy family.
It actually isn't that time consuming and in the long term makes life easier.
I don't have many metal albums (no pun intended), so they take up a little corner of my CD rack and if I ever happen to purchase more metal albums, they can slot in easily. The same for my Symphonic Prog section.
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66588
Posted: August 31 2011 at 09:15
Alphabetical order by artist and then by album title. Newer purchases are kept haphazardly or by alphabetical order until such time that the desire to work them in to the main collection hits in which case there is a massive overhaul and everything gets shifted to make room for the new additions. Everything is also burned to the computer for instant access and use on the iPod. Generally, I seem to have a physical CD playing in the car and on occasion I will throw a physical CD in the CD player at home (usually a newer purchase) but I seem to have become more and more dependent on listening to music on either the computer or the iPod.
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Posted: August 31 2011 at 08:20
I use RYM for cataloguing my collection.
As I said previously, I catalogue them to genres first. I'd much prefer to have all my jazz artists together and separate from other genres and that's exactly what I've done.
It makes life much easier.
Some artists/bands have large discographies, so everytime you purchase a new CD by them, you'd have to move a whole load of albums to slot that album in. Leaving gaps at the end of Genres really makes things easier. It's a whole lot less work to move 20 or 30 CDs across, compared to 100+.
Joined: September 15 2007
Location: Vitória, Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 7971
Posted: August 30 2011 at 20:53
JJLehto wrote:
I have it in release order for each artist. Like Opeth for example I have orchid first, then morningrise etc to Watershed. Though I have the artists in absolutely no order.
One day when I'm bored enough I'll put em in artist order as well. Seems like the easiest way to me honestly
I have it in release order for each artist. Like Opeth for example I have orchid first, then morningrise etc to Watershed. Though I have the artists in absolutely no order.
One day when I'm bored enough I'll put em in artist order as well. Seems like the easiest way to me honestly
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Posted: August 30 2011 at 20:03
Like this:
The bulk of the collection is kept in those fake wood big shelving of varying heights and widths alphabetical by artist, then chronological when I'm not too lazy. I have a set of fifty of the newest discs in my collection in a CD changer and keep those cases towards the middle in this photo collage in two plastic at the top under one set of music DVDs. Up at the top right is a loose "floppy" organizer which has a fluctuating selection of the newest CDs I bought by in terms of release years.
Edited by Slartibartfast - August 30 2011 at 20:13
Joined: March 18 2009
Location: Buenos Aires
Status: Offline
Points: 2766
Posted: August 28 2011 at 14:53
I separate my shelves into categories. The most important categories I use are:
1-Prog Rock/Jazz
2-Alt Rock/Grunge/Punk
3-Heavy Metal
4-Classic Rock/Hard Rock
And then I try to establish either a certain chronological order between the categories, or subcategories (for example: under Heavy Metal first I have the "Classic Heavy Metal" bands such as Sabbath, Maiden, Priest, then Thrash bands, the Death Metal and so on)
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Posted: August 28 2011 at 12:45
zappaholic wrote:
alphabetically by artist, chronologically for each artist.
This is my method too, with the exception of my Henry Cow and Magma boxsets which are too chunky for my cheap CD storage thingies and have to sit on top of them instead. I even include VA compilations in the alphabetical mix, using the compilation title in lieu of an artist name. TBH, I can't understand why anyone with a lot of CDs to organise would use any other method. Surely it'd just be a bugger to find what you're looking for if you go with grouping by genre or label or just shoving the things wherever you find a space for them?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.244 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.