Jennifer Anniston or Angelina Jolie |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
UndercoverBoy
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 10 2009 Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 5148 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 21:37 | |
Oh you...
*fixed*
|
||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 21:36 | |
Cool. Since Aniston isn't either one, I wonder why you voted the way you did.
|
||
UndercoverBoy
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 10 2009 Location: Tulsa, OK, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 5148 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 21:35 | |
Anyways, Anniston by quite a bit. I've always preferred cuteness over sexiness. Also, please make those eyeball tattoo pictures GO AWAY!!!! No offense intended to anyone here, but I hate body modification.
Edited by UndercoverBoy - October 25 2010 at 21:38 |
||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 19:43 | |
Jennifer Anustown. (My joke name for her .) But if you're talking beauty contest, I'll go with Jen. Of course Angelina ain't too bad looking either.
|
||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
||
A Person
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 19:01 | |
There is almost someone viewing it when I check active users. |
||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:52 | |
Aniston beats overrated Jolie every day of the week...
|
||
|
||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:41 | |
Meh . . . to each his own. I'm not exactly in the best position to be particular.
|
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:29 | |
I have nothing against tattoos. I just do not find them attractive on women, that's all. |
||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:27 | |
^ Yeah, see, things like that and the girl I posted . . . that's when I think any reasonably-educated person would have to draw the line for themselves, and if the poor choice of tattoo placement was any indicator of the other person's state of mind, I wouldn't blame anyone for walking the other direction as fast as possible.
But an arm tattoo or a back tattoo have never bothered me.
|
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:25 | |
Within reason? Like... Edited by Epignosis - October 25 2010 at 18:26 |
||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:20 | |
And as for the tattoos thing . . . I don't know if I would ever get one for myself, but if a girl is attractive anyway, tattoos can be sexy, as far as I'm concerned. You know . . . within reason: |
||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:20 | |
No, Cuddy, Cameron or 13.
|
||
The Truth
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 19 2009 Location: Kansas Status: Offline Points: 21795 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:19 | |
Ellen Page is the answer.
|
||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:16 | |
Neither to me.
|
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:12 | |
Also, I would add that tattoos do not appeal to me.
|
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:11 | |
By the way Micah, it would seem your defunct "beautiful people" thread is the thread a lot of folks here still look at. I counted eight guests viewing it.
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/active_users.asp |
||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:09 | |
Blunt! But to the point.
|
||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:08 | |
If by "natural curves" you mean the curvature of her wrist bone... |
||
Triceratopsoil
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 03 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18016 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 18:04 | |
well, I'd f**k either...
|
||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: October 25 2010 at 17:54 | |
Rob, if Angelina's natural curves look like mere skin and bones to you, I do have to wonder about your eyesight. I have a really good doctor who would give you a discount. Just sayin'
Salma Hayek is very attractive, but again, I find a woman in her same league a bit more attractive: Penelope Cruiz.
Edited by JLocke - October 25 2010 at 17:55 |
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |