Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Alberto Muņoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: August 19 2009 at 09:14 |
micky wrote:
RATT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! they were prog for sure |
Looking for you... looking for me...
Round and Round!!!
|
|
|
Fieldofsorrow
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: August 19 2009 at 02:53 |
^ And to that I say, Amen! But I'm also inclined to think that Megadeth will not be added to this site, due to the very reasons that it has been dismissed/ignored previously. I haven't been here long, but it strikes me that the admins and collaborators, or whoever else is in charge, are very strong in their ideals of what should and shouldn't be here, and quite rightly so. Thus, a 'no' once will probably be as final as a 'no' any other time.
Unless, of course, we've brought any fresh argument to light? But I suppose it's all been said before...
|
Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: August 19 2009 at 01:36 |
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
And yes, bands on the 'fringes' are always going to be a source of disagreement, inevitably. But the question is, should these sort of artists be on the website, or is their progressive direction too vague to be included?
|
I think that those artists that keep being suggested again and again by knowledgeable members/collabs should indeed be added - but as prog related.
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: August 19 2009 at 00:01 |
Might we see the Ratt sig again Micky?
I think we might in the future.
|
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 23:18 |
RATT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! they were prog for sure
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 22:49 |
^White Lion belongs there...
|
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 17:44 |
Not saying that either should be here, but personally I'd add Exodus sooner than Megadeth. And, though getting into apples and oranges territory, I'd sooner add Judas Priest than either.
Incidentally, and irrelevantly, isn't about time that we had a Progressive Hair Metal category? ;)
Edited by Logan - August 18 2009 at 17:48
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 14:40 |
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
^ with all due respect, I think it's a rather big step from Megadeth to Slayer. Megadeth are technical and innovative, Slayer are almost one-dimensional by comparison. Don't get me wrong, I love albums like Reign in Blood or Seasons in the Abyss. Testament is a slightly different story - they were definitely much more experimental on The Ritual than Slayer ever were, but I still would not call them Prog-Related. The same goes for Anthrax.
BTW: I think we should try to avoid confusing technicality/complexity with simply "difficult to play". Most Thrash is difficult to play compared to "normal" metal, that goes without saying.
|
I agree with the first paragraph. I was not saying Slayer was more prog-related than Megadeth (though, in a way, I think Reign in Blood was a progression for metal, of a complete different kind...) But if Megadeth were added, I'm sure sooner or later other names of the era would appear...
|
|
|
CPicard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Lā, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 14:32 |
This whole thread makes me wanting to campaign again for the inclusion of Coroner.
|
|
Fieldofsorrow
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 10:32 |
^^ Precisely. Of course an odd time signature does not instantly allow music to be considered progressive, but many fields of prog have always been complex, and irregular time signatures indisputably add to that level of complexity, even if not in terms of progressiveness.
And yes, bands on the 'fringes' are always going to be a source of disagreement, inevitably. But the question is, should these sort of artists be on the website, or is their progressive direction too vague to be included?
|
Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 03:19 |
^ those are all valid points, but the odd time signature is an important part of prog ... like it or not. It's neither mandatory nor is a piece of music automatically prog if it features an odd time signature, but it is one of the recurring elements throughout most prog genres. I'm sure there are even some Post Rock/Metal pieces that are not in 4/4 or 6/8.
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 02:18 |
Meh, the odd time signature= element of prog is bullsh*t and superficial IMO. Why this website still uses something as meaningless and exceptionally superficial as a judge of prog rock is honestly well beyond me. When I think of odd time signatures, I can just as easily think of Soundgarden, Alice In Chains, Minus the Bear and Joe Satriani all of which have not much to do with prog rock but have plenty of examples of odd time in their music, as well as a sh*t load of jazz and classical that has barely anything to do with rock music at all, let alone prog. I bet if you rounded up every single song on the database and went through them, a very large amount wouldn't have odd time sigs in them at all. I'm quite pretty much all of Agalloch's discography is based around 4/4 and 6/8, so I guess Jerry Cantrell's debut solo record "Boggy Depot" is by comparison true prog rock because the first very track of the album features a very prominent 7/4 time signature riff right? *rolls eyes*. I don't think it can even "sometimes help" make it more progressive at all. So much of the post rock and post metal stuff is based around 4/4 and 6/8. It's all about the composition and always has been and always will be. Whether or not odd time is involved, it's just kinda there and doesn't add anything to the progressiveness of music. If the composition isn't there, odd time doesn't do squat to increase a compositions prog rock cred, period.
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 01:50 |
Fieldofsorrow wrote:
Well, ok, it would be no great loss if Megadeth weren't here, and perhaps the principal of not adding bands just because of the attributes already outlined, would be upheld better and save other artists who don't belong here from becoming an unnecessary part of PA. It depends really on what actually makes a band qualify for this site, and if development isn't solely what this is about, then fair enough.
|
The problem is that those attributes that you outlined *are* why many bands are here ... but it depends on how bands use those attributes. For example, choosing to play a song in 7/8 *can* sometimes help making it more progressive. Sometimes it can also come across as overly technical and uncalled for. In the end for most bands that are on the fringes, whether to call them Non-Prog, Prog-Related or Prog is an intuitive choice, based on your listening experience as well as musical knowledge.
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: August 18 2009 at 01:45 |
^ with all due respect, I think it's a rather big step from Megadeth to Slayer. Megadeth are technical and innovative, Slayer are almost one-dimensional by comparison. Don't get me wrong, I love albums like Reign in Blood or Seasons in the Abyss. Testament is a slightly different story - they were definitely much more experimental on The Ritual than Slayer ever were, but I still would not call them Prog-Related. The same goes for Anthrax.
BTW: I think we should try to avoid confusing technicality/complexity with simply "difficult to play". Most Thrash is difficult to play compared to "normal" metal, that goes without saying.
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: August 17 2009 at 17:39 |
Metallica, of the big four of the thrash era, is the only one who directly influenced prog-metal and they actually recorded three prog-metal albums. But if we add Megadeth, then let's start with Slayer, then Anthrax, then by connection let's go with Testament... eventually we'll have added every metal band ever....
|
|
|
Fieldofsorrow
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: August 17 2009 at 12:45 |
Well, ok, it would be no great loss if Megadeth weren't here, and perhaps the principal of not adding bands just because of the attributes already outlined, would be upheld better and save other artists who don't belong here from becoming an unnecessary part of PA. It depends really on what actually makes a band qualify for this site, and if development isn't solely what this is about, then fair enough.
|
Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
|
Posted: August 17 2009 at 12:21 |
Not that aiding the progression of metal is your sole reason for thinking that the band would be suitable for PR, but taking that statement alone would not be enough for inclusion -- imagine if we opened up the archives to all those bands that aided the progression of rock. PR and PP doesn't work that way, but I've long felt that the music should speak for itself (the obvious problem being that music speaks differently to other people, which partially depends on knowledge and exposure). I'm not knowledgeable enough about metal (progressive or otherwise) to hold much of an opinion on this band. Off-topic, but I wonder if, for instance, the Holy Modal Rounders should be included in PP due to their influence on psych/folk?
|
|
|
Fieldofsorrow
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 27 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: August 17 2009 at 12:03 |
I'd like to see Megadeth here. Since Mustaine started off in Metallica, some of his original work was used by them in 'Kill 'Em All'. Megadeth have tempo changes, at least one instance of odd time, lengthy songs, and harmonically intricate riffs (not just to a technical extent). I believe them to have a place in the prog related section, as they aided the progression of metal.
|
Groovy teenage rock with mild prog tendencies: http://www.myspace.com/omniabsenceband
|
|
tintedweed
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 62
|
Posted: August 17 2009 at 11:07 |
Mustaine has had some awesome guitar players all through - Poland, Friedman, Al Pitrelli and himself... In contrast, who do we have in Metallica..
|
|
Negoba
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
|
Posted: August 17 2009 at 10:42 |
I am a big Megadeth fan, but nothing they did approaches the degree of progginess of the song "And Justice for All." And frankly I don't think Metallica should be here either.
BTW, I think Mustaines soloing is great. It fits the music very well, though his bag of tricks isn't all that deep. Chris Poland plays circles around him (In Dave's own words) but really fits the setting he's in now better than it ever did in Megadeth. I was so excited when Marty Friedman joined and never got the payoff I anticipated. The only thing of his I liked was the acoustic interlude for Holy Wars and I read somewhere that everything on that song was imitations of scratch solos Poland had done.
Anyway, big vote NO.
|
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.