Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Loseless vs Lossy?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLoseless vs Lossy?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2009 at 01:21
http://www.heise.de/ct/Der-c-t-Leser-Hoertest-MP3-gegen-CD--/artikel/124391

They used high end gear (B&W Nautilus 803, Marantz CD14, Marantz PM14, Straightwire-Pro cables, sonically perfect room), but still most contestants (many of them audio professionals) could not tell the original (CD) apart from 256kbps MP3.

My recommendation: Go for MP3 instead of lossless ... but only at a discount. The MP3 should cost significantly less than the full CD. You can get reasonably priced MP3s at eMusic.com and Amazon.com, for example.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2009 at 00:32
There doesn't seem to be a point in going lossless if you can get a 320 kbps mp3 of the song, so long as you don't have somewhat high end equipment. But if you're thinking of lossless vs. 120 kbps songs and nothing in between, uh, hell yeah go for it. But go for FLAC for sure. Nothing plays APE files holy crap they're almost useless.
Back to Top
Evan View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 13 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 98
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 23:53
Originally posted by Shot.By.His.Own.Son Shot.By.His.Own.Son wrote:

Yeah I realized after I posted it that it was in the wrong spot, and I have yet to listen to a lossless track so I have no idea how they sound.


Have you listened to an album on a purchased CD?  If so, you've essentially listened to a lossless track.  Try ripping a CD you know well to an mp3 file and play it alongside the CD and see if you can tell the difference in a blind test. 
Back to Top
Shot.By.His.Own.Son View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 12 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 23:44
Yeah I realized after I posted it that it was in the wrong spot, and I have yet to listen to a lossless track so I have no idea how they sound.
Back to Top
cobb2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 22:38
If you are asking this, then you can't tell the difference, by listening?

If this is the case what diff does it make. All I would be asking is- do you have the resources to hold them all as lossless. If not opt for 320kbs mp3.

also- this will get moved shortly
Back to Top
Evan View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 13 2009
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 98
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 21:52
If space isn't an issue, go with lossless.  If your short on space, try getting at least your favourite albums in lossless.  With a good speaker system, and especially on decent headphones, you can tell the difference.  It shows most clearly on certain sounds - acoustic guitar passages, cymbol crashes - but all and all there is a marked increase in quality.  Granted, just because a lossless file will have 10 times the bit rate of a lossy mp3 doesn't mean it will sound 10 times better - the difference is of course marginal. 
Also, remember that the #1 factor in quality is always what occurs upstream.  A poorly produced or engineered album will never sound pristine.  Conversely, very well produced albums (Crime of the Century, Aja) sound great even when compressed. 

Lossless files are the same quality as CDs.  Ever thought your CDs sounded better than your digital downloads?  Go with lossless.  Can't tell the difference?  Many people can't, and if thats the case you may be perfectly happy with mp3s, especially those 192kpbs and up.  However, i believe there is to some extent a placebo effect here - just having files in lossless makes you think they sound better.

Another bonus to lossless files is that you can convert them around to other formats and burn the to CDs with no decrease in quality.  Messing around with mp3s is like making a photocopy of a photocopy. 
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 21:47
Vs. Flossy.


THOSE WHO DONT UNDERSTAND HAVE AN INDIE/ASIAN-SHAPED HOLE IN THEIR HEARTS


Edited by stonebeard - July 14 2009 at 21:48
Back to Top
explodingjosh View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 10 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 507
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 21:32
Depends on what you're playing the tracks with. If you're playing on a small 16 bit mp3 player with little ear buds, then Lossless is a waste of space.

If you're playing on a big, wide, 24 bit stereo system with top of the line equipment, then, there will be a difference.


Beware though, most "audiophile" equipment is extremely over priced and the expected performance is advertised using pseudoscience.


Edited by explodingjosh - July 14 2009 at 21:34
Back to Top
Shot.By.His.Own.Son View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 12 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2009 at 21:13
Is it really worth having my songs in lossless format? Is the sound really much better or is it just a waste of space?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.504 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.