Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog based on books?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg based on books?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2009 at 05:00
Originally posted by The Whistler The Whistler wrote:

Yeah, I think if you're going to review a movie, you have to just see the movie. Now, if you're going to MAKE the movie, I'd say the least you could do is read the damn book...

As for the topic at hand, I might be totally wrong here, but BASED SOLEY ON THE COVER, I believe that Leviathan by Mastadon has something to do with Moby Dick.

 
The original Leviathan was a mythical beast of a massive size and became a generic term for anything huge in the sea, from ships to whales so the album could have been about Moby Dick or a mythical sea beast or just a term for a massive output of sound as the word has come to mean anything huge. In book terms, John Wyndham's The Kraken Wakes was certainly on this theme. 
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2009 at 04:16
Originally posted by cobb2 cobb2 wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

Animals, by Pink Floyd, is based on Animal Farm, by George Orwell. I have almost no Idea what the book is about, but I love that album.
It isn't based on Animal Farm

But if anyone wants to come back at me and insist that it is. Well I'm not arguing, believe what you want.Smile

No, I believe it was done just because they had purchased a fairlight CMI synth, which could sample anything and play it back on the notes of the keys. Hence the animal noises (sampled) and the animal names of the songs. Wikipedia does quote this as being losely based on Animal Farm, but I can find no references to Orwell's work in the lyrics- just another urban myth

Also Dogs, Sheep and Pigs weren't even the original song titles. Dogs was called Shaking and Grooving (or something, I haven't looked it up.LOL...hang on "Shaking and  Droolin'" maybe?)

Anyway...by changing the songs names to Animals makes a nice theme.Smile
Back to Top
cobb2 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 25 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 415 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2009 at 04:05
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

Animals, by Pink Floyd, is based on Animal Farm, by George Orwell. I have almost no Idea what the book is about, but I love that album.
It isn't based on Animal Farm

But if anyone wants to come back at me and insist that it is. Well I'm not arguing, believe what you want.Smile

No, I believe it was done just because they had purchased a fairlight CMI synth, which could sample anything and play it back on the notes of the keys. Hence the animal noises (sampled) and the animal names of the songs. Wikipedia does quote this as being losely based on Animal Farm, but I can find no references to Orwell's work in the lyrics- just another urban myth
Back to Top
martinprog77 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2523 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2009 at 03:48
 FRAMESHIFT "Unweaving the Rainbow" is base in Richard Dawkins' books on evolution
Nothing can last
there are no second chances.
Never give a day away.
Always live for today.


Back to Top
Soul Dreamer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 17 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 997 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2009 at 20:10
I don't know if it has been mentioned, but the album Christ0 of Vanden Plas is based on The Count of Monte Christo by Alexandre Dumas 
To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34076 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2009 at 06:46
Toto - Dune Big smile made for the David Lynch movie based verson of the Dune novels written by Frank Herbert

music made for a movie based on a novel.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2009 at 03:29
Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

Animals, by Pink Floyd, is based on Animal Farm, by George Orwell. I have almost no Idea what the book is about, but I love that album.
It isn't based on Animal Farm

But if anyone wants to come back at me and insist that it is. Well I'm not arguing, believe what you want.Smile
Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2009 at 01:19

Yeah, I think if you're going to review a movie, you have to just see the movie. Now, if you're going to MAKE the movie, I'd say the least you could do is read the damn book...

As for the topic at hand, I might be totally wrong here, but BASED SOLEY ON THE COVER, I believe that Leviathan by Mastadon has something to do with Moby Dick.
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 22:40
Originally posted by Dellinger Dellinger wrote:

Animals, by Pink Floyd, is based on Animal Farm, by George Orwell. I have almost no Idea what the book is about, but I love that album.

Go ahead and read it, here is the link: http://www.george-orwell.org/Animal_Farm/index.html
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12799 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 22:22
Animals, by Pink Floyd, is based on Animal Farm, by George Orwell. I have almost no Idea what the book is about, but I love that album.
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 20:16
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by floydispink floydispink wrote:

 

If you review an album like The Snow Goose without having read the book you have a much more objective view on the music. If you have read the book and you disliked it very much, that will probably have a negative effect on the review of the album, while that review should be about the music. The Snow Goose is reviewed 340 times, and I'm sure the biggest part of those reviewers haven't read the book, but those reviews have the same value as the reviews of people who have read the book. You can't make a difference between those groups, as everybody has their own way of writing a review, with or without background information to the album. 

If you have read the book, I'm sure it enhances ones pleasure of the album.

But I insist...an album must stand by its own merits!
 
BTW Gallico try to sue Camel for that work, what a Wacko




Back to Top
dver View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: July 06 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 5 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 15:58
Supper's Ready is based on biblistic passages

and that Blind Guardians middle-earth album, based on silmarillion.

and Dream Theaters- The Ministry of Lost souls is based on a japanese manga ( not kidding , JP confirmed)
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 07:15
Originally posted by floydispink floydispink wrote:

 

If you review an album like The Snow Goose without having read the book you have a much more objective view on the music. If you have read the book and you disliked it very much, that will probably have a negative effect on the review of the album, while that review should be about the music. The Snow Goose is reviewed 340 times, and I'm sure the biggest part of those reviewers haven't read the book, but those reviews have the same value as the reviews of people who have read the book. You can't make a difference between those groups, as everybody has their own way of writing a review, with or without background information to the album. 

If you have read the book, I'm sure it enhances ones pleasure of the album.

But I insist...an album must stand by its own merits!
Back to Top
The Sleepwalker View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 15141 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 07:12
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

The Snow Goose seems most obvious (I haven't read it). 


Yet you've reviewed the album!

How can you possibly give an informed appraisal if you haven't read the book on which it's based???

Quite easily. he listened to the album.


Brilliant!

So you would review the film of Lord of the Rings without reading the trilogy first, would you, thus having no idea whatsoever how well the film interpreted the book?? You could do it, but noone in their right mind would regard your review very seriously. "I enjoyed/didn't enjoy (delete as appropriate) this film even though I had absolutely no idea what it was about and whether the characters were accurately portrayed!" Or Bridehead Revisited. Or Skellig. Or any other great book that has been filmed. You just can't do it credibly.

Without reading Gallico's novella, you can't have a clue about the structure, moods and images Camel portray in their music, which is why many of the reviews of The Snow Goose are frankly so laughable.
Yes I would and.yes the review would be credible. You don't need to read a book to review a film. You watch a film to review a film. Thats why its a film review.
Do proffesional reviewrs read the book of the film they are reviewing? No  Do people who read magazines like "Empire" regard the reviews seriously? Yes they do.

Case closed!


Do you SERIOUSLY believe this?? Of course they read the book!!!!!!!! Any who didn't would be utterly discredited professionally. For a professional to review a film based on a book without relating the film to the book is absolutely unthinkable.

You obviously don't know any professional film/theatrereviewers (and I know several very well, including my own sister-in-law). Perhaps I'm naive to expect common-sense from everyone on this site.




I'm backing up Snow Dog 100% on this one. When you are reviewing the film, you are reviewing the film and not the book. When you are reviewing music, you are reviewing the MUSIC, not the book it's based on. Leave that to the book reviewers. Of course, comparing it to elements of the book would make the review more interesting to read, but it's not compulsory. Are you saying if the reviewer didn't know that the music is based on a book then he should be disallowed from reviewing it?

Thank you pessimist.

Hercules is not only rude but seems to be living in some strange fantasy world of his own.


Oh..and he is wrong!
LOL


So I'm rude for pointing out that you are factually incorrect in your assertion that professional film reviewers would not read a book on which a film is based before reviewing the film? Listen to Mark Kermode on Five Live when he reviews any film based on a book (I expect you will have heard of him) and he always refers to the way the film interprets the book. All professional reviewers do.

Perhaps my naivety is expecting professional standards on an amateur site.

I always listen to Kermode and he hasn't always tread the book...comic...or watched the TV series or whatever. You see..Mark Kermode undrstands something that you totally fail too. Which is a film or album has to stand on its own legs, by its own merits. 

The fact that you say that all prefessional reviwers read the book first is utterly ludicrous to be quite frank.

If this site is too amateur for you, well you are free not to be involved.


Think about it...can you imagine a reviwer...with a deadline.. having to read Lord Of The Rings beforereviwing it? I mean....seriously?



If you review an album like The Snow Goose without having read the book you have a much more objective view on the music. If you have read the book and you disliked it very much, that will probably have a negative effect on the review of the album, while that review should be about the music. The Snow Goose is reviewed 340 times, and I'm sure the biggest part of those reviewers haven't read the book, but those reviews have the same value as the reviews of people who have read the book. You can't make a difference between those groups, as everybody has their own way of writing a review, with or without background information to the album. 
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 07:06
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

I think people who see a film before reading a book can give a fresh opinion on it.

For instance, I sat through Twilight on Saturday, and while my sister, wife, and mother were all thoughtfully discussing the finer points of the adaptation, I was able to sit there and go, "What the f**k is this sh*t?  No way in hell I'm reading it now!"

Good point, well made.Wink
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32550 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 07:03
I think people who see a film before reading a book can give a fresh opinion on it.

For instance, I sat through Twilight on Saturday, and while my sister, wife, and mother were all thoughtfully discussing the finer points of the adaptation, I was able to sit there and go, "What the f**k is this sh*t?  No way in hell I'm reading it now!"
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
SaltyJon View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 06:55
Erm...time to sneak in a post between the arguments, I understand that Hugh Hopper's album 1984 is loosely based on and/or inspired by the novel 1984.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 06:36
Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

 

Oh, and while we're on about rude, it wasn't me who told my Godson to "f**k off and die" about 3 years ago after his first (and not surprisingly, last) post on this site. I'm sure you will remember having to apologise to him. He was so upset, I made a note of the offender's identity, so there is no doubt that you are the person.

So please don't lecture me on rude.
 

Was I lecturing? See my post...absent oi lecturing. 
But it is true. It was a misjudged joke on my part...which I explained to his teacher by PM. I regret the joke because it was taken seriously.

Anyway, because you say I was rude (which I wasn't really, I was outright offensive, albeit unintentionally) does that mean you should be too?

Edit.

Can we just end this now? We disagree obviously. That isn't going to change. our views, but I read and listen to professional reviews as much as you, maybe more..who knows?


Edited by Snow Dog - July 06 2009 at 06:50
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2009 at 06:33
Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

The Snow Goose seems most obvious (I haven't read it). 


Yet you've reviewed the album!

How can you possibly give an informed appraisal if you haven't read the book on which it's based???

Quite easily. he listened to the album.


Brilliant!

So you would review the film of Lord of the Rings without reading the trilogy first, would you, thus having no idea whatsoever how well the film interpreted the book?? You could do it, but noone in their right mind would regard your review very seriously. "I enjoyed/didn't enjoy (delete as appropriate) this film even though I had absolutely no idea what it was about and whether the characters were accurately portrayed!" Or Bridehead Revisited. Or Skellig. Or any other great book that has been filmed. You just can't do it credibly.

Without reading Gallico's novella, you can't have a clue about the structure, moods and images Camel portray in their music, which is why many of the reviews of The Snow Goose are frankly so laughable.
Yes I would and.yes the review would be credible. You don't need to read a book to review a film. You watch a film to review a film. Thats why its a film review.
Do proffesional reviewrs read the book of the film they are reviewing? No  Do people who read magazines like "Empire" regard the reviews seriously? Yes they do.

Case closed!


Do you SERIOUSLY believe this?? Of course they read the book!!!!!!!! Any who didn't would be utterly discredited professionally. For a professional to review a film based on a book without relating the film to the book is absolutely unthinkable.

You obviously don't know any professional film/theatrereviewers (and I know several very well, including my own sister-in-law). Perhaps I'm naive to expect common-sense from everyone on this site.




I'm backing up Snow Dog 100% on this one. When you are reviewing the film, you are reviewing the film and not the book. When you are reviewing music, you are reviewing the MUSIC, not the book it's based on. Leave that to the book reviewers. Of course, comparing it to elements of the book would make the review more interesting to read, but it's not compulsory. Are you saying if the reviewer didn't know that the music is based on a book then he should be disallowed from reviewing it?

Thank you pessimist.

Hercules is not only rude but seems to be living in some strange fantasy world of his own.


Oh..and he is wrong!
LOL


So I'm rude for pointing out that you are factually incorrect in your assertion that professional film reviewers would not read a book on which a film is based before reviewing the film? Listen to Mark Kermode on Five Live when he reviews any film based on a book (I expect you will have heard of him) and he always refers to the way the film interprets the book. All professional reviewers do.

Perhaps my naivety is expecting professional standards on an amateur site.

I always listen to Kermode and he hasn't always tread the book...comic...or watched the TV series or whatever. You see..Mark Kermode undrstands something that you totally fail too. Which is a film or album has to stand on its own legs, by its own merits. 

The fact that you say that all prefessional reviwers read the book first is utterly ludicrous to be quite frank.

If this site is too amateur for you, well you are free not to be involved.


Think about it...can you imagine a reviwer...with a deadline.. having to read Lord Of The Rings beforereviwing it? I mean....seriously?

EDIT. Ok..I just checked up, because I wanted to be sure. Mark Kermode has neither read Lord Of The Rings or Harry Potter yet he insists on reviwing the films.

OK?






Edited by Snow Dog - July 06 2009 at 07:13
Back to Top
Hercules View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2009 at 17:35
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by The Pessimist The Pessimist wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Originally posted by TGM: Orb TGM: Orb wrote:

The Snow Goose seems most obvious (I haven't read it). 


Yet you've reviewed the album!

How can you possibly give an informed appraisal if you haven't read the book on which it's based???

Quite easily. he listened to the album.


Brilliant!

So you would review the film of Lord of the Rings without reading the trilogy first, would you, thus having no idea whatsoever how well the film interpreted the book?? You could do it, but noone in their right mind would regard your review very seriously. "I enjoyed/didn't enjoy (delete as appropriate) this film even though I had absolutely no idea what it was about and whether the characters were accurately portrayed!" Or Bridehead Revisited. Or Skellig. Or any other great book that has been filmed. You just can't do it credibly.

Without reading Gallico's novella, you can't have a clue about the structure, moods and images Camel portray in their music, which is why many of the reviews of The Snow Goose are frankly so laughable.
Yes I would and.yes the review would be credible. You don't need to read a book to review a film. You watch a film to review a film. Thats why its a film review.
Do proffesional reviewrs read the book of the film they are reviewing? No  Do people who read magazines like "Empire" regard the reviews seriously? Yes they do.

Case closed!


Do you SERIOUSLY believe this?? Of course they read the book!!!!!!!! Any who didn't would be utterly discredited professionally. For a professional to review a film based on a book without relating the film to the book is absolutely unthinkable.

You obviously don't know any professional film/theatrereviewers (and I know several very well, including my own sister-in-law). Perhaps I'm naive to expect common-sense from everyone on this site.




I'm backing up Snow Dog 100% on this one. When you are reviewing the film, you are reviewing the film and not the book. When you are reviewing music, you are reviewing the MUSIC, not the book it's based on. Leave that to the book reviewers. Of course, comparing it to elements of the book would make the review more interesting to read, but it's not compulsory. Are you saying if the reviewer didn't know that the music is based on a book then he should be disallowed from reviewing it?

Thank you pessimist.

Hercules is not only rude but seems to be living in some strange fantasy world of his own.


Oh..and he is wrong!
LOL


Oh, and while we're on about rude, it wasn't me who told my Godson to "f**k off and die" about 3 years ago after his first (and not surprisingly, last) post on this site. I'm sure you will remember having to apologise to him. He was so upset, I made a note of the offender's identity, so there is no doubt that you are the person.

So please don't lecture me on rude.
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.