![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
JLocke ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
![]() |
I don't read music, but I can tell you that when I use programs on my computer to write music, I will often find myself being blocked from going further until I assign the correct time signature to the particular bar I'm working on at the time, and sometimes I will end up with something that sounds to me like it could fit a smaller time signature perfectly, but the program itself won't allow it.
I think it has alot to do with the note values and rhythms you're using. Sometimes 7/8 will sound better than 7/4 or 6/8 better than 3/8 simply based on the little differences I made in the note values or the rhythms.
Again, I can't read music, so my music theory knowledge is very limited, but . . .
|
|
![]() |
|
triplechanger ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() Joined: July 14 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 21 |
![]() |
Also the time signature can be based around a paticular melodic figure and what sort of rhytm woud suit it more.
|
|
Gravity is a CIA plot to keep us on earth...
No way! Yes way! |
|
![]() |
|
Mr ProgFreak ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 08 2008 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 5195 |
![]() |
As some of the guys with degrees in music theory will also tell you (when they see this thread): Most music is organized in groups of 2 or 3 beats. Of course you can break every complex signature down into such groups, and usually a 3/4 piece will have a grouping of 2-2-2, while one in 6/8 will have 3-3. Personally, in Rock music I usually listen to what bass and snare drum are playing. For example, to tell 7/8 from 7/4 you can count the bass/snare drum notes and compare the pattern to a typical rock beat where the bass drum would be on 1 and 3, and the snare on 2 and 4. As a specific and well known example, if you listen to Pink Floyd - Money, you'll notice that within one sequence of 7, the bass drum plays on 1, 3, 5 and 7, and the snare drum on 2, 4 and 6. That's much more consistent with two bars of 4/4 with the last beat ommitted, than with one bar of 4/4 with one 8th note missing.
|
|
![]() |
|
refugee ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() VIP Member Joined: November 20 2006 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 7026 |
![]() |
Basically, 6/8 is 2/4 in triple time, but sometimes it can be a bit confusing:
However, care must be taken when interpreting a 6/8, or similar, time signature, as on occasion they are simple time signatures (6 quavers beats to a bar, as opposed to 2 triplet-quavers to the bar). That said, in the majority of cases, 6/8 is a 2 beat time signature. (Wikipedia) 9/8 is 3/4 in triple time, whereas 12/8 is 4/4 in triple time. All these signatures are compound time signatures, as opposed to simple time signatures. Here’s the link to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_signature By the way, I wish you a happy birthday tomorrow! |
|
He say nothing is quite what it seems;
I say nothing is nothing (Peter Hammill) |
|
![]() |
|
topofsm ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 17 2008 Location: Arizona, USA Status: Offline Points: 1698 |
![]() |
As a musician who can read music, I've sometimes found it a bit unusual when there are certain time signatures used instead of others on sheet music. I thought this would be a great place to discuss it.
I've constantly been confused on why composers use 6/8, 6/4, and 3/4 seemingly interchangeably. Yes, I can totally understand why some composers use 6/8 as sort of a swung 2/4. However, there have been several times when the piece definetely sounded like it could be in 3/4, and my conducter counted it like that. I swear it would have been so much easier for her to count out "1, 2, 3" than "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6" over and over again. And I have seen 6/4 used, why not just write it as 3/4? 6/4 seems too long of a time signature to me.
Also, why do some composers use 12/8 to indicate a swung four when there's only a couple eighth notes in the passage, when a composer could easily have written 4/4 and have used a triplet eighth note in its place?
And this is not something that I'm confused about, but I'd thought I'd mention it. The symphony I am in has been playing the last 3 movements of the Firebird suite and the final movement includes a great section in 7/4. When I started reading it, it was a bit confusing. However, I realized that there were measures inside the measures. It turns out, inside the first measure of 7/4 there was a measure of 3/4 and then 2 of 2/4. The smaller measures were bordered by thinner lines, and each group adding up to 7/4 was surrounded by a thicker bar line. How cool is that?
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |