Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Can someone tell me... (Moody Blues/Procol Harum)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCan someone tell me... (Moody Blues/Procol Harum)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 01 2008 at 08:11
But again Whistler...Why move the band that defines Proto Prog from Proto Prog?
 
It's like moving Jethro Tull out of Folk Prog. We know they involve more than Folk in heir albums, that they crossed several genres, but they defined the term Prog Folk which was created fot them...so why moving them out?????
 
The same goes for Procol Harum.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - September 01 2008 at 08:46
            
Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 01 2008 at 03:33
Wow Rico, it actually DID turn into a big ole debate. Fancy that. I'm still not entirely sure where to come down on all this; the various arguments seem pretty sound. I mean, to a certain extent, I think that they should be "equals." But Maybe Procol was getting less classically proggy after '69. Although, then and therefore, what should they be considered? Did they take up the Doors' mantle and become Gothic art blues or something?
 
Therefore, were a move to be suggested, I'd say Eclectic above Crossover; the Procol Harum that I know (and am currently listening to ("Simple Sister," Broken Barricades)), is less an art-pop fusion, and more an art-blues fusion.


Edited by The Whistler - September 01 2008 at 06:14
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 01 2008 at 02:37
Originally posted by Hawkwise Hawkwise wrote:

Wacko


words better, emoticons not so much. Wink


Edited by Ricochet - September 01 2008 at 02:38
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 22:53
Originally posted by sinkadotentree sinkadotentree wrote:

I must admit when i reviewed "Days Of Future Passed" the other day i was surprised The Moody Blues were in the Crossover genre.I thought they were proto-prog. With any band though their whole discography has to be considered not just a couple of albums right? A lot of bands could have some albums in one genre and some others in another.


well...  DoFP was only one, the first,  of what is called the 'classic 7'. Had they stopped after the first.. sure.. they would have fit in proto.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Hawkwise View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 31 2008
Location: Ontairo
Status: Offline
Points: 4119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 22:53
Wacko
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 22:39
personally I think Procol Harum fits best in proto-prog. maybe early moodies fits there to, but I can see the moodies in cross-over aswell. leave it as it is, is my opinion.
 
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Mellotron Storm View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 27 2006
Location: The Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 13684
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 22:37
I must admit when i reviewed "Days Of Future Passed" the other day i was surprised The Moody Blues were in the Crossover genre.I thought they were proto-prog. With any band though their whole discography has to be considered not just a couple of albums right? A lot of bands could have some albums in one genre and some others in another.
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"

"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 21:03
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

I confess I don't know Barclay James Harvest at all, so I can't comment on them being in Eclectic. Wink


hahhahaha...  shhhh.... don't say that LOL

Rico.. Procol Harem is going to be looked at by us I guess in AR.  Time for us to brush on them... then we..errr...  both.. can brush up on BJH LOL 


The effort is considerable whether we're talking MB, PH or BJH. I honestly imagine that you'd have to know deep into the music and the history to make the best judgement. Smile
Micky - we were asked to evaluate Procol Harum for a poss move to Xover back in March this year. Smile


sh*t... my PM box must have been full....I'll get on brushing up on them this week. 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 20:47
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

I confess I don't know Barclay James Harvest at all, so I can't comment on them being in Eclectic. Wink


hahhahaha...  shhhh.... don't say that LOL

Rico.. Procol Harem is going to be looked at by us I guess in AR.  Time for us to brush on them... then we..errr...  both.. can brush up on BJH LOL 


The effort is considerable whether we're talking MB, PH or BJH. I honestly imagine that you'd have to know deep into the music and the history to make the best judgement. Smile
Micky - we were asked to evaluate Procol Harum for a poss move to Xover back in March this year. Smile
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 20:24
Originally posted by jammun jammun wrote:

Let's not be messin' w/ Procol.  They're a total proto-prog band, and I mean no disrespect to them in saying that.  Those first three albums absolutely paved the way for all that came after.  Can't say the same for them Moodies, however.
 
ClapClapClap
 
Exactly, whjat other band was rekleasing a song like A Whiter Shade of Pale that was incorpoirating clear Symphonic elements into their music with a Baroque organ solo?
 
They were ahead of most bands in those years and pioneered the Proto Prog genre, while the Moody Blues was still adding a Symphony Orchestra to a pop structure and Pink Floyd was doing pure Psyche.
 
If Proto Prog must be defined by one band, it is Procul Harum, the real link between Psyche and Prog.
 
Lets give Proto Prog the respect it deserves, it's not a Prog Related or a Prog Pop genre,. it's Progressive Rock in embryonary state, without PP God knows what would had come later..
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 19:57
Let's not be messin' w/ Procol.  They're a total proto-prog band, and I mean no disrespect to them in saying that.  Those first three albums absolutely paved the way for all that came after.  Can't say the same for them Moodies, however.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 11:22
true.. but that is why they give us the big hats and the corner offices with the big windows and the hot secretaries. That is what we do here LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 11:19
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

I confess I don't know Barclay James Harvest at all, so I can't comment on them being in Eclectic. Wink


hahhahaha...  shhhh.... don't say that LOL

Rico.. Procol Harem is going to be looked at by us I guess in AR.  Time for us to brush on them... then we..errr...  both.. can brush up on BJH LOL 


The effort is considerable whether we're talking MB, PH or BJH. I honestly imagine that you'd have to know deep into the music and the history to make the best judgement. Smile
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 11:16
Originally posted by febus febus wrote:



After reading your always interesting posts here on PA, i think getting a book full of Micky euthemisms should be a valuable experience for the future generations to come..never thought of publishing one yet??LOLWink


hmmm.. good idea....  I'll use them as chapter flags when I write my autobiography though... .the life of mick LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 11:14
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

I confess I don't know Barclay James Harvest at all, so I can't comment on them being in Eclectic. Wink


hahhahaha...  shhhh.... don't say that LOL

Rico.. Procol Harem is going to be looked at by us I guess in AR.  Time for us to brush on them... then we..errr...  both.. can brush up on BJH LOL 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 11:04
I confess I don't know Barclay James Harvest at all, so I can't comment on them being in Eclectic. Wink
Back to Top
febus View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 10:59
[QUOTE=micky]^ very true...  part of me says... what is the use moving groups around when they can fit in mulitple categories anyway.  The ol' famous micky euthemism for pounding square pegs into round holes.

After reading your always interesting posts here on PA, i think getting a book full of Micky euthemisms should be a valuable experience for the future generations to come..never thought of publishing one yet??LOLWink
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 10:52
^ very true...  part of me says... what is the use moving groups around when they can fit in mulitple categories anyway.  The ol' famous micky euthemism for pounding square pegs into round holes.


then again...  the other side of me thinks .. what is the true purpose of the categories.  Not for archival sense .. that is not what this site is about.... but to be guides for general forum so it might facilitate their discoveries.   So any chance to move a band out of PR.. or PP to categories that actually SAY something about their music is always welcome. 

PH is a good example... but Deep Purple is the most glaring example of this.   4 or 5 Heavy Prog albums.. with their clones sitting in HP.. yet they are stuck incorrectly in Proto.  Doesn't make much sense... but happy to start with PH. 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
febus View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 10:36
Originally posted by The Whistler The Whistler wrote:

Why The Moody Blues are crossover prog, and Procol Harum is proto? I mean, dude! They both came out at the same time with their big ole "landmark" records ('67, Days Of Future and Procol Harum respectively). And, dude, by the late seventies Procol was clearly doing the proggier thing (I mean, Octave is certainly leaning in a poppier direction, whereas Something Magic has a song that takes up a single side! Who else was doing that in 1977? Well...Yes or ELP probably, but still).
 
Personally, I think they should both just be "art rock" and that'll fix everything. But, hey, what do I know? Convince me otherwise, if'n you can.
 
And to make the whole thing more insane ,you can see ..BARCLAY JAMES HARVEST is in eclectic prog???? they 're musically the cousins of the Moody Blues!
 
Eclectic, crossover, proto, what else?........just words!!    let say they are prog ''light''LOL
They could also  be in the symphonic category as they all embraced at a time or another the use of classical orchestras and mellotron gallore.
Art rock fit them well as well.........so what's the truth?
None , just personal opinion.......just let me enjoy the music ! Tongue
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 31 2008 at 10:17
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Guigo and I both feel that Procol Harum are misplaced and should be in a prog category. It is though up to the genre teams to decide who is in and who is not.
 
I think the Moody Blues are in the right place, presumably you are use just citing them as evidence re PH.


evidence I'm sure...  what other place could there be for the Moodies.  Xover was created FOR them. LOL They didn't fit anywhere else.. so we had to create a sub for more pop orientated prog.


We'll see about PH..  havne't listened to them in some time...  I'll take this like a normal suggestion.. and put it to the AR team.. and we'll hash out a new sub.



The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.195 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.