The Who? Proto-Prog? |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | |||
jimidom
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 02 2007 Location: Houston, TX USA Status: Offline Points: 570 |
Posted: August 31 2007 at 12:38 | ||
I know where they are coming from regarding Kiss as an influence. In their very early days, Kiss shared the bill with bands like the New York Dolls and the Harlots of 42nd St.
|
|||
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST
|
|||
Easy Money
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10619 |
Posted: August 31 2007 at 11:43 | ||
Edited by Easy Money - August 31 2007 at 11:43 |
|||
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 25 2007 Location: Devon,UK. Status: Offline Points: 2078 |
Posted: August 31 2007 at 11:26 | ||
the only thing i have against this,is calling the who punk related,just cuz of power chords and the high energy the provide which to be honest if you listen to most albums isnt always trademark for example quadrophenia,a quick one,who are you,tommy no real relivance to punk and even with the my generation the song writing capabiltys are much more complex then punk music.Weather there should be on here or not, i dont care the more awesome bands the merrier.
|
|||
Easy Money
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10619 |
Posted: August 31 2007 at 11:03 | ||
|
|||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 14:31 | ||
awesome.... I really do love how people can look at the same picture and draw different interpretations from it. I don't mean that as a smartass but in a serious way. For me the Who's real importance was not exactly for rock in general (we have the more blues based groups where rock has always tended to lay, like Zeppelin, to count as the major influences on rock in general) but where the Who really influenced rock was again for what I tried to mention in the bio by bringing intellectualism and 'art' (along with all it's pretentiousness and seriousness) to rock music... and that again is exactly what prog was ALL about when you dissect prog down to the bone. |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 12:36 | ||
^
The Who brought plenty to rock, but we don't hail every innovation as progressive or there would be scores more bands here. I don't think what they were doing before the 70s necessarily contributed to the progressive aspect of the prog rock we know (though beyond a doubt they did to the rock part).
Anyway I'm not necessarily against their inclusion giiven it fits the interpretation we have of proto-prog at the archives. It's not a interpretation or to some degree even a genre I agree with but that's the way it is and I know there's no changing it.
|
|||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|||
micky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46833 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 11:18 | ||
hmmm..... obviously no one is 'in' Townshend's head. However I think he can be seen much like Waters... he has his vision...and he wasn't a slave to the prevailing currents around him. It's easy to see the prog influence on Zeppelin...they went from stealing blues songs to having prog rock creep into some of their music. That is why they went in PR (disagree still as I do with their inclusion). However to say that the Who suddenly started in the 70's making prog ignores a more general concept of what prog is about. That is what the Who brought to rock...and what prog was all about. The Who influenced prog on an order of light years more than the prog movement influenced them. It's all opinion of course... and I think the bio states nicely that point of view. |
|||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|||
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 02 2006 Location: Methil Republic Status: Offline Points: 1594 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 11:08 | ||
I personally think The Who are as prog as many bands on the Archives but, since many don't, proto-prog fits the bill. |
|||
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 11:00 | ||
^ I disagree. I'm not taking away any influence The Who had in the rock spectrum. Indeed, nearly every rock band since has been influenced by them. I'm also not taking away from the band's musical prowless. I think both Who's Next and Quadrophenia are absolultely genius, great song writing, 5 star albums. However, I think these albums were influenced by the progressive rock movement which was at its height. Pre-69 The Who were doing things that would forever change and influence rock musicians. In the 70s they were bitten by the prog bug and were very much filing suit with their unique tinge of it.
|
|||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|||
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 02 2006 Location: Methil Republic Status: Offline Points: 1594 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 10:51 | ||
Proto-Prog definitionRock Bands in existence prior to 1969 that influenced the development of progressive rock. The late 60's was a predominately experimental period for music. These bands were moving in a stream that eventually led to prog. The influence could have come from new sophisticated forms of writing and playing music, recording techniques, new instruments and vocal harmonies to name a few. Some of these bands became progressive rock bands themselves others did not.i think The Who have met this definition since 1966, when they released A Quick One.
|
|||
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|||
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2492 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 10:50 | ||
|
|||
Chicapah
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 14 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8238 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 10:45 | ||
One of the things I love about this site is the open-mindedness of the members but that seems to be in short supply when it comes to the Who. Like them or not, they blazed a trail that contributed to what became progressive rock because they thought outside the box. If one has a problem with Pete and the boys being here then I would venture to say that Led Zep, Beatles, Deep Purple and many others would fail to qualify for similar reasons. I suggest that you read the reviews for the Who albums and consider the rational arguments for their inclusion before writing them off. Or just get over it. Either one.
|
|||
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
|
|||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 10:38 | ||
^ Both bands albums come at the height of the prog-rock movement, so I don't know how either are proto |
|||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|||
Yorkie X
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 04 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1049 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 10:34 | ||
can`t believe Sabbath aint here but the who is man ?
|
|||
A B Negative
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 02 2006 Location: Methil Republic Status: Offline Points: 1594 |
Posted: July 24 2007 at 10:18 | ||
Why can't The Who be proto-punk and proto-prog?
|
|||
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
|
|||
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: July 23 2007 at 17:52 | ||
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=35591 |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Online Points: 19538 |
Posted: July 23 2007 at 17:52 | ||
I'll start it tonight or tomorrow Bob.
Iván
|
|||
|
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: July 23 2007 at 17:17 | ||
A new thread is needed in the "Suggest bands" section for the Bonzos if they are being proposed for addition.
|
|||
fuxi
Prog Reviewer Joined: March 08 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2459 |
Posted: July 23 2007 at 16:10 | ||
If it helps, on HATWISE CHOICE Dave Stewart clearly states that Hatfield & the North were influenced by the Bonzos! |
|||
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: July 23 2007 at 13:16 | ||
A massive thumb up for the Bonzo Dog Band in proto-prog section. They are much more complex, diverse (and progressive) version of Giles, Giles and Fripp. |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |