This thread is regarding the allocation of a budget to specific components of our hi-fi system.
For those of us who value sound quality equally as important as our music I wish to recommend an excellent tome that was brought to my attention on another forum. The book in question being “The Complete Guide To High-End Hi-Fi” by Robert Harley.
Whilst perusing this superb book, which many consider to be the Hi-Fi enthusiast’s bible, I came across the section regarding allocation of costs when choosing your system. He recommends the following budget for a system based on the source component being a CD player. Please note that his figures are just that, a recommendation, and NOT set in stone.
Pre-amplifier 20 %
Power Amplifier 20 %
Digital Source 13 %
Loudspeakers 40 %
Cable / Interconnects 7 %
My figures are as follows:
Pre-amplifier 16 %
Power Amplifier 31 %
Digital Source 15 %
Loudspeakers 31 %
Cable / Interconnects 7 %
My figures are fairly close to his recommendation, being determined by many factors, although my system was built prior to reading the book.
So, dear users, what are your approximate percentages? If you have more than one source, and I’m sure many of you will have, include them as well. I think, for the sake of argument that stands / isolation platforms should be included in the cables / interconnects figure, as I have done with mine.
Also, please omit any modern digital stuff such as mp3 players/pods etc.
As you can see I have omitted costs. This is for two reasons. Firstly, it’s not relevant as we are talking about proportional figures. Secondly, it will eliminate any pre-conceived notions regarding the relative quality of the kit.
And please note – this is just a light-hearted exercise – just a bit of fun.
Edited by Glueman - April 21 2007 at 07:07