The truth about the TOP 100 ranking |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||
darkmatter
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 23 2006 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 2760 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 21:56 | |
I agree. I don't mind the top 100, but the more important thing is that you like the album. Rankings don't necessarily mean anything other than that the majority of people like these albums. |
||
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 24 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 8844 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 21:51 | |
I don't understand why anybody gives a crap about the top 100. If you love an album, then you love an album. Does it really matter that it isn't on the list some computer algorithm spit out?
|
||
|
||
russellk
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 28 2005 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 782 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 20:36 | |
I think the algorithm is nigh on perfect, and I want to publicly thank those involved. It's all in how you use it, really. The top albums are the best' popular' prog albums; others further down the track are either popular albums on which opinion is divided, or more obscure albums beloved of fans. What tends to happen, I've observed, is that as an obscure album gets noticed and more people acquire it, the average rating gradually drops and its position stays about the same. This seems to be as the album moves out of the ambit of fans only and into the general prog consciousness.
Lotsa fun and not a life or death issue. Edited by russellk - March 28 2007 at 20:38 |
||
lightbulb_son
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 20 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 965 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 20:16 | |
In all honesty, I don't pay much attention to the top 100 anymore. Really guys, it's not a big deal. If you want to change anything, then submit more reviews.
I do think the algorithm should hold quality over popularity, but thats just my opinion.
|
||
When the world is sick
Can't no one be well But I dreamt we were all beautiful and strong |
||
lightbulb_son
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 20 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 965 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 20:14 | |
Youch that was quite a burn. I personally love progtology.com. They have a good balance IMO, although at times its a tad too prog-metal heavy.
|
||
When the world is sick
Can't no one be well But I dreamt we were all beautiful and strong |
||
proghairfunk
Forum Groupie Joined: August 18 2006 Status: Offline Points: 99 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 20:08 | |
out of curiosity, what is the actual formula for the alogirithem, so i can see how much emphasis is placed on either part.
|
||
Frasse
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 22 2004 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 758 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 18:17 | |
Yeah, I want to know too.
Edited by Frasse - March 28 2007 at 18:18 |
||
Chris H
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 08 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC Status: Offline Points: 8191 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 18:09 | |
Yeah but you can combat that arguement with something that was already said. For a prog "newbie", the exposure to the really popular albums will lead to exploration and eventually ratings/reviews to the lesser-known albums.
The thing that bothers me though, is that the people that think the lesser-known albums dont get enough ratings and complain about it never seem to write reviews of their own
|
||
Beauty will save the world.
|
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21133 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 18:05 | |
This is the problem: Some people get angry because some of their favorite albums have higher average ratings than CttE or the other albums in the top 10 (20, 50, 100 etc) but fewer ratings/reviews ... so they're demanding that the weight of the popularity (number of ratings) is reduced because they think this makes the algorithm more "fair".
|
||
Chris H
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 08 2006 Location: Charlotte, NC Status: Offline Points: 8191 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 18:00 | |
I dont see why so many people with the rating system.
I personally think that it's the perfect balance, neutralize popularity with quality. What can go wrong?
|
||
Beauty will save the world.
|
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21133 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:56 | |
It's a mistake ... I wrote that text in a hurry. Of course it should say "prog" instead of "metal" ... BTW: If you think that there's too much metal and not enough rock on PROGtology.com ... submit some ratings to even it out! Edited by MikeEnRegalia - March 28 2007 at 17:57 |
||
el böthy
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 27 2005 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 6336 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:36 | |
Ehm... yeah, so? |
||
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
||
Angelo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:35 | |
I hope that word in bold is a mistake???? Or is this the algorithm from progtology.com? Edited by Angelo - March 28 2007 at 17:35 |
||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
||
martinn
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 09 2006 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 360 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:23 | |
Yes, so...?
|
||
|
||
Failcore
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 27 2006 Status: Offline Points: 4625 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:21 | |
I think its a pretty good algorithm. However, it would be even better if you could choose the emphasis, ratings or popularity. But maybe that's too much work for the end result.
|
||
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21133 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:08 | |
^ this is a statement which I made in another, non-public thread ... akin thinks it is offensive and might cause some kind of controversy if made available to the public. So I allowed him to quote it ... in case any of you are wondering why this thread exists, and why the first post is in quotes.
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - March 28 2007 at 18:20 |
||
akin
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 06 2004 Location: Brazil Status: Offline Points: 976 |
Posted: March 28 2007 at 17:04 | |
"The album ranking algorithm is an attempt at finding a balance between
quality (average rating) and popularity (number of ratings) . If
popularity was not considered at all the top of the chart would be
cluttered with hundreds of obscure albums with only one or two 5 star
reviews. If quality was not considered the top of the chart would
essentially show the most most reviewed albums. In order to find a
balance between those two extremes the parameters of the algorithm were
configured so that the resulting chart matches the expectations of the
typical prog expert (your faithful admins and collabs). For example,
the top 10 should feature albums which are considered to be the best
prog albums of all time - like Close to the Edge, Selling England by
the Pound or ItCotCK. Of course there are some experts who believe that
the true masterpieces are not among these most popular albums ...
"hidden gems" like Gentle Giant - Octopus, CAN - Ege Bamyasi, Magma -
Mekanik Destruktiv Kommandoh, Van der Graaf Generator - Pawn Hearts ...
these are albums with high average ratings (quality) but fewer reviews
(popularity) than the widely known albums. But you can't please
everybody, and especially for newbies the more popular albums are a
good starting point for exploring metal ... save the best for last!"
|
||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |