I was looking at the Beatles discography, the ratings, and, there was a fact that caught my attention: The first six albums don’t reach the 3.5 stars, and only since Revolver there are 4+ stars reviews in average. I’m a fan of The Beatles, but a young one. But I’m sure I agree with the old fans (those who had the luck of saw them born) that their first period is not only “good, but non-essential”.
So, why all those 2/3 stars rates? I understand that before Revolver you don’t find any prog at all, but that doesn’t mean the albums are poor. Or it is that I’m a kind of freak who loves prog and also the first period of The Beatles?
…by the way, my favourite albums are Abbey Road and the white album, and in general, I prefer the post Revolver era.