Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 19:07 |
What about bird song? Music or sound?
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 19:00 |
If he takes that bark and composes it into a raga then that is music, otherwise it is just a dog barking. Using the dog bark in that way would be objet trouvé in the same vein as a found poem or a Picasso's bicycle seat bull. A ceramic urinal is not art until an artist (in that example Marcel Duchamp) designates it as such.
Ilayaraja may hear music in any repetitive sound, but it is not music in its own right, it is just sound.
|
What?
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 18:45 |
Well, the composer Ilayaraja said even a dog's bark is music and he has composed nearly 2500 tracks of music, and nearly all of it strictly in the conventional melodic tradition, mind. Maybe the composers, especially a genius like him, can see possibilities in sound that most listeners cannot.
|
|
HolyMoly
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: April 01 2009
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Points: 26138
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 13:16 |
Atavachron wrote:
I suppose one interesting venture would be to try to delineate at what sonic point does sound end and music begin.
|
I'm not sure of this yet, but I think my position is it has a lot to do
with the intent of the "performer" or sound source. Maybe that's why
someone on a stage playing a jack hammer in the context of a concert can
be said to be playing "music" (now there's a concert I'd go see), and a
bird tweeting away in a tree cannot. The bird doesn't CALL it music -
it's just what birds do when... I don't know why they tweet, but I don't
think it's for my enjoyment. So I guess this position defines music as the product of an intentional act. Not sure how sound that is (ha ha unintentional pun), but I might nurse that idea for a bit.
|
My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased.
-Kehlog Albran
|
|
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 12:44 |
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ So, why would e-cigs be considered just a fad? Aren't they the future? |
my gut says no .. I think people who never smoked are using them because they're caught up in the technology and the need to look cool .. like why young kids smoke in the first place. plus most places wont allow them .. so they aren't accomplishing anything. I think - as your friend does - they'll just eventually lose interest and either smoke ciggies or quit. we'll meet back here in a year and see if it happens or not
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 12:39 |
^ So, why would e-cigs be considered just a fad? Aren't they the future?
|
|
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 12:35 |
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ Nothing wrong with e-cigs. I have a co-worker who smokes one, and I'm happy for him; it doesn't bother me. He still keeps coming back to actual cigarettes, though, believe it or not.
Internet and iPhone were "fads", remember? |
I don't recall anyone considering those to be fads - and I was certainly around for the beginning of both. ipads maybe ..I don't think they will last Planking = fad
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 12:31 |
^ Nothing wrong with e-cigs. I have a co-worker who smokes one, and I'm happy for him; it doesn't bother me. He still keeps coming back to actual cigarettes, though, believe it or not.
Internet and iPhone were "fads", remember?
|
|
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 11:41 |
*frinspar* wrote:
This growing e-cigarette culture is making me grumpy. Not only do people look incredibly foolish sucking on those ridiculous sonic screwdrivers, but they just love talking about the new flavor juice they just found. And it seems like there are more e-cig supply stores popping up than weed stores in Colorado.
|
yes!! then again I hate all fads ... there's something about mass unoriginality that makes me crazy
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
|
*frinspar*
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2008
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 463
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 11:39 |
This growing e-cigarette culture is making me grumpy. Not only do people look incredibly foolish sucking on those ridiculous sonic screwdrivers, but they just love talking about the new flavor juice they just found. And it seems like there are more e-cig supply stores popping up than weed stores in Colorado.
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 11:07 |
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ In that case may I add trucks that drive in the fast lane? ... You have trucks driving parallel to each other on the fast and the slow lane. I'm not surprised why we in Reno get heavy clogging every morning of a business day.
|
One of the major causes of motorway tailbacks imo. One lorry in the inside lane doing 56mph, another lorry in the middle lane trying to overtake it uphill at 56.0001mph so everyone has to go in the outside to get round them.
|
|
Walton Street
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 872
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 08:09 |
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ In that case may I add trucks that drive in the fast lane? ... I'm not surprised why we in Reno get heavy clogging every morning of a business day. |
we don't get that where I am .. it's illegal and they are strict about it. last night I followed a POS in stop and go traffic who was in the passing lane - and left a 30 car space ahead of him. I finally got a chance to pass him and in doing so, he looked at me and sped up - waving at me like a little %&*$ .. lucky for him I have a kid I want to see again or his passive aggressive would have met my manic aggressive
|
"I know one thing: that I know nothing"
- SpongeBob Socrates
|
|
Dayvenkirq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 08:06 |
^ In that case may I add trucks that drive in the fast lane? ... You have trucks driving parallel to each other on the fast and the slow lane. I'm not surprised why we in Reno get heavy clogging every morning of a business day.
Edited by Dayvenkirq - January 29 2015 at 08:07
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 07:43 |
Jim Garten wrote:
Walton Street wrote:
People who drive and don't signal |
With you on that - Check out my very first post in this thread.
| Drives me mad. Increasinly large numbers of people don't bother with their indicators round my way. &rseholes!
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 03:31 |
I suppose one interesting venture would be to try to delineate at what sonic point does sound end and music begin.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Star_Song_Age_Less
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 08 2014
Location: MA
Status: Offline
Points: 367
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 03:12 |
Dean wrote:
Lovely rant and I'm with you all the way Jamie.
We can analyse some (not all) birdsong and identify that some of it is kinda pentatonic, and we can describe scientifically that the harmonic pitch relationship between those tones follows a mathematical formula, but we can never call birdsong music even though the same mathematically described harmonic pitch relationships form the basis of what we can and do call music. As I have said many times, music theory is the after-the-event analysis and description of what we call music, not the predefined rules that are used to create it. Science can increase our understanding of the physics of sound and harmony, but it cannot define our aesthetic appreciation of it.
Nice to see someone else take a swipe at 'philosophers' for a change |
and
Atavachron wrote:
I once had a fight with someone over the same issue;
he believed any audible sounds could be construed as music, and as
adorable a notion as that is, he refused to acknowledge that the two
must be different or we wouldn't perceive and define them as different.
|
Bless you both! A breath of fresh air. Sometimes it's nice just to know you're not the only one out there. 'Philosophers' drive me insane. It took 2000 years for humanity to rise above the idea that Aristotle was right because he was a thinker. I don't want to go back now. Thinking is important, but no matter how much you think the world has the last word. I've had several people in various versions of this class argue the same, that any sound could be music to a particular listener. The idea that we have different definitions for music and sound tends to win over all but one or two people. I decided to run a class experiment to tell the difference, but it is a bit late and I'm getting tired... don't think I should type out the particulars right now. Maye will attach at a later date.
|
https://www.facebook.com/JamieKernMusic
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 02:23 |
I once had a fight with someone over the same issue; he believed any audible sounds could be construed as music, and as adorable a notion as that is, he refused to acknowledge that the two must be different or we wouldn't perceive and define them as different.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 02:16 |
Lovely rant and I'm with you all the way Jamie.
We can analyse some (not all) birdsong and identify that some of it is kinda pentatonic, and we can describe scientifically that the harmonic pitch relationship between those tones follows a mathematical formula, but we can never call birdsong music even though the same mathematically described harmonic pitch relationships form the basis of what we can and do call music. As I have said many times, music theory is the after-the-event analysis and description of what we call music, not the predefined rules that are used to create it. Science can increase our understanding of the physics of sound and harmony, but it cannot define our aesthetic appreciation of it.
Nice to see someone else take a swipe at 'philosophers' for a change
|
What?
|
|
Star_Song_Age_Less
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 08 2014
Location: MA
Status: Offline
Points: 367
|
Posted: January 29 2015 at 01:53 |
So here's a thing that keeps popping up in my head and bugging me. What is it with the modern culture of including just about everything everywhere?
Example... I think we can all agree that various genres of music are, in fact, music. Rock, symphonic, jazz, experimental, rap, prog (of course), metal, etc. etc... And I can at least somewhat understand the logic of calling things like bird song music. Okay, sure. Not music to my ears, but then again neither is most rap. However... you'll get some overly-fluffy, politically-correct-to-the-extreme person spouting nonsense like, "The sunset is music." But wait.... he doesn't mean that in a metaphorical sense. He'll actually argue with you that the sunset itself is, literally, music. And I know this because several years ago, it happened in a class full of adults on the physics of music.
Since then, I've noticed this sort of ultra-inclusivism all over the place. It hit me on here a few nights ago and I had to take a lot of deep breaths and shut the computer off to calm down. Because this one really bugs me:
"Music is science!"
NO! No it's not! Science is science! And music is music! And here I am ranting about it relatively calmly because I've had a few days to recover from constant fuming. This one bugs me a lot because I am both a physicist and a musician, and while I can explain musical principles scientifically, I understand science enough to know that music does not fall into the same category is biology, chemistry, geology, physics and astronomy. Those things are trying to explain the natural world through a very specific set of procedures. Music... is more like an attempt to cope with or describe the world in any sound-related way you can. To me, trying to call music science is no different than calling prose science. It just doesn't make sense.
Among other, to my mind, insane inclusions in music are: "Poetry is music" [No, poetry can be part of music but in and of itself it isn't]. "John Cage's 4:33 is music" [No... no it's the equivalent of a blank canvas.... though I know many would argue with me about that, this is a rant right?] "The world around us is music" [Arrrrgh! No, it's just the world! You have to make music out if it!]
Those are only the music ones though. It's more just this general culture of being so unwilling to exclude anyone or anything from any category that makes everything seem cross-referenced with everything else. This may be exaggerated for me because I work on a campus, where these notions seem to take flight thanks to the endless head-banging of the philosophy majors. (One of whom, by the way, once attempted to argue with me that science was less real than philosophy - which I suppose stemmed from "I think therefore I am," meaning to philosophers thoughts are more real than observations of the world around them. I find that delusional. Again, rant. Weirdly, though, that is not a new-age idea at all, that's from way back in Ancient Greece at least... maybe further).
The rant took a turn!
|
https://www.facebook.com/JamieKernMusic
|
|
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: January 07 2015 at 02:59 |
Walton Street wrote:
People who drive and don't signal |
With you on that - Check out my very first post in this thread.
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.