![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Author | |||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
Agreed ... having the entire discography was always the policy of the archives, and even looking at the non-prog albums of a discography can be useful to understand the artist, and the opinions about him.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
^ This would be a great addition to the reviews ... you would simply need to add a genre dropdown to the review form.
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Sir Hogweed ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 29 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 191 |
![]() |
||
I've allways thougt adding genres to albums would be a great improvement. Cheers to PA for finally taking the step. Thinking of it. Why don't you collaborators create a poll-option for each album in which you define the possible genres and let members vote between the options (I believe Mike mentioned a thing like this).
Example:
Queen 2:
x Art-Rock (40%)
x Symphonic Prog (35%)
x Non Prog (25%)
445 votes
[cast your vote]
or
Hot Space
x Non Prog (85%)
x Art Rock (15%)
These numbers would be quite informative to newcomers, apart from the rating.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
greenback ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 14 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3300 |
![]() |
||
i think we should include ALL the albums of a prog artist: this will allow people to analyze the progression/regression of the artist, and even orient their taste for every album of the artist.
for example, mike oldfield was first prog, then he turned new age but he did excellent new age albums like song from the distant earth, and this is something i really appreciate to know.
|
|||
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
^ for these bands everything would stay as it is, without any manual work.
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
The advantage is that the well known bands is easy, wqhen he have to deal with bands from Tanzania or Pre-Perestroika Yougoslavia or Romania bands, where info is very limited.
And believe me, we have a lot of rare bands from the most exotic places (where we don't have a single member.
But yes it's a better idea, I agree now (With slight reservations).
Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 22 2006 at 14:45 |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
Not necessarily. When genre by album is introduced, we simply copy the artist genre to the albums. Then, little by little, we can mark the "exceptions". It wouldn't hurt at all if "We Can't Dance" will then be marked as "Symphonic Prog" until we get around to marking it differently.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
I tend to agree with you tinking things better, but it would be a hell of a job tagging Non Prog after listening 25,000 (Oxymoron) albums in my case
![]() Iván Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 22 2006 at 14:40 |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
oscar ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: January 11 2006 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 74 |
![]() |
||
I think deleating records.....it is so subjective! Prog in its genuine meaning... Then we have too delete a lot of bands and only invlude After crying from the last decade
|
|||
Life is PROGRESSIVE
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
^ That's another advantage of just labeling the albums non-prog ... it can be easily reversed, and no reviews or ratings are lost. That also means that it isn't a crucial decision, so we don't need complicated votes. Which would be kind of time-consuming with more than 10,000 albums ...
Edited by MikeEnRegalia - April 22 2006 at 14:17 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
But SD, if this albums ARE NOT PROG, why in hell do we have them on a Prog site?
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
The very idea of removing parts of discography is againsr everything I believe in here. No way do I want to see ANY album removed.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Chipiron ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 05 2005 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 780 |
![]() |
||
I don't like the idea of "excluding" any of the bands recently added. For me, it's useful to know the comments on albums by Deep Purple, Queen... I think the idea of labeling the albums as "non prog" and not allowing them to appear on the ranking is quite good.
One of the reasons for visiting PA is that the reviews are made by people with tastes similar to mine, the labels are not that important...
|
|||
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Your vote will be counted
![]() But Genral opinion of the people involved make the decision, probably BG will stay, or even We Can't dance, but the group by simple votes decide.
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
It would already be a "radical" solution to have some designated people decide that an album is non-prog ... there'll be some tough changes.
Let's decide that later, when genre per album is available, shall we?
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
||
Well as part of a group,I say Big Gen stays.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Mike sometimes radical solutions are better, if the people designed by the site to decide that an album goes no more, it goes no more!!!!!
Sounds Draconian, but M@x or the Adm block the albums, and that's all Folks, the album doesn't come back.
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
The problem is that then people would constantly try to add these albums, as the discography isn't complete, or ask why album xyz isn't there. No, I think the artist pages would be more useful if it clearly tells the visitor which parts of the discography we think is progressive. This would also settle MANY problems with the prog related bands, for example if we categorized the first few Deep Purple albums as PRoto-Prog, and the rest as Non-Prog.
Remember: Non-Prog albums could still be reviewed, but would not be shown on the front page.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21531 |
![]() |
||
The problem with genre classification is that we all have slightly different definitions of genres. It's most apparent with this new "Hard Prog Rock" thing. If we would leave the classification to all members we would end up with many votes that technically aren't valid/reasonable because the voter had something completely different in mind than what the genre really means (by the definition).
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19557 |
![]() |
||
Mike wrote:
Well, I feel more comfortable deleting all those albums we (as a group) believe are non Prog. like We Can't Dance (Genesis) BIG Generator (Yes), Vynil Confessions (Kansas), etc.
Leaving the bands clean from a Prog' perspective.
Iván
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |