Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The right to own a firearm
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe right to own a firearm

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 18:09

We used to award 100 points if you could knock down an old dear, when i was a boy racer!LOL

Oh no offence intended 3F8T's




Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 18:06
Originally posted by danbo danbo wrote:

Before long, we'll all be eating Soilent Green. That's why I had "Eat Me" tattooed on my arse.

Speed laws are to blame. Being alert and cautious, as well as reducing speed in highly travelled deer crossing areas really makes a difference. About one third of the deer/auto accidents I'm familiar with could have been avoided. Believe me, I've seen about two a week in just over five years. People forget that the animals were there long before we came on the scene.   

Beat me to it.Clap




Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 18:05
Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Are we saying that deer should be culled because they are inconvenient?Confused

I find hunting for sport to be barbaric in the sense that it I can find no justification for anyone to kill anything senselessly. However as long as the hunting is for food eg not just for a trophy,then I cant really muster a valid argument against it.

I think vegetarians Angryare just as pathetic as hunters.Angry

When a family plows into a deer that stepped out onto the highway at 65 mph and their son or daughter flies through the windshield I will be sure to let them know we couldn't keep the deer population down just because it was an "inconvenience"

I am absolutely certain that if this "family" had been wearing seat belts they would NOT have gone through the windshield!Confused

BTW I am pretty certain that I drive well enough not to hit anything on the roads. Greg you should not be reading "Playgirl" whilst driving your van!LOL




Back to Top
Dan Bobrowski View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 18:02

Before long, we'll all be eating Soilent Green. That's why I had "Eat Me" tattooed on my arse.

Speed laws are to blame. Being alert and cautious, as well as reducing speed in highly travelled deer crossing areas really makes a difference. About one third of the deer/auto accidents I'm familiar with could have been avoided. Believe me, I've seen about two a week in just over five years. People forget that the animals were there long before we came on the scene.   

Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 17:53

We have had a big problem in New Jersey also with deers causing really bad car accidents.  One reason I love the City... if my subway hits a deer, I'll never feel it...

However I was in Australia a couple of years ago when they had open season on killing kangeroos... that was not nice... and some of the restaurants were serving kangeroo burgers...

THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 17:26
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Are we saying that deer should be culled because they are inconvenient?Confused

I find hunting for sport to be barbaric in the sense that it I can find no justification for anyone to kill anything senselessly. However as long as the hunting is for food eg not just for a trophy,then I cant really muster a valid argument against it.

I think vegetarians Angryare just as pathetic as hunters.Angry

When a family plows into a deer that stepped out onto the highway at 65 mph and their son or daughter flies through the windshield I will be sure to let them know we couldn't keep the deer population down just because it was an "inconvenience"

All over the midwest we have restaurants adorned with animal trophies on the walls so it is pretty much the norm here. There's a particular pizza place that has this squirrel armed with a bow and arrow up on a shelf...that one is my favorite...that's what I call CLASS.

Actually I belong to PETA

P...People

E...Eating

T...Tasty

A...Animals

Back to Top
Dan Bobrowski View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 16:52

One must always eat what they hunt, right girls?

Actually, in the US, I'm not sure about other countries, deer and some other native animals are hunted, by PERMIT, in order to keep the populations under control. When there is over-population, many deer (and others) starve due to limited food availability. The permits are issued on the basis of the animal population. Deer are not hunted merely because they are an inconvience.

I totally abhor trophy hunting or fishing.

Do vegetarians taste like salad?

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 16:39

Are we saying that deer should be culled because they are inconvenient?Confused

I find hunting for sport to be barbaric in the sense that it I can find no justification for anyone to kill anything senselessly. However as long as the hunting is for food eg not just for a trophy,then I cant really muster a valid argument against it.

I think vegetarians Angryare just as pathetic as hunters.Angry




Back to Top
will View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 13 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 223
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 16:30

Firstly, im glad to see you peter i havent read one of your tantelising post for a while and it warms my heart to hear from you (over the top but you get the point). Its also great to see you have returned my Reedlover, i for one am glad your back.

I don't have much to say on the subject of this debate as i have never posessed a gun and will hopefully never feel the need to. I f u really need to protect your self you can buy perfecly good knives or even better pepper spray. I personally own thrrowing knives but never carry them in public (well... sometimes). I would rather see all guns destroyed (thers nothing like a bit of medeival combat (joke). Seriously i would like guns to be banned but i also realise this is not possible.Guns could be banned but so many people own them that is it possible to make sure every gun is returned.

Its human nature to want to kill someone every now and again but its the ability to override these thaughts that makes us rationable and not complete psychos. However some people are complete psychos for watevere reason (parenting, disabliity, peer pressure etc). My point is that the blame for the crime must fall on th eperson who commits it. So guns do kill people but only because people make them. The guns have no choice in the matter and cant give much defense in court. For this reason the responsibilty is for the gun carrier to make sure it isnt misused.

I see taht both sides of the debate present a good argument but im in favour of the less guns the better. Now lets roll a joint and sing along to "leave it" (YES).

Guys nad gals never forget "A real froob knows where his towel is"

IM WELL AWARE OF THE SPELLING MISTAKES AND AM TO LAZY TO CORRECT THEM LOL



Edited by will
Long live progression.
Will
Back to Top
Dan Bobrowski View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 16:28

Pretty interesting article. While I lived in the Sierra foothills, my wife, my father in law and one daughter each nailed a deer. They caused quite a bit of damage.

I hit one bear, nicked the hind quarters, no damage to my vehicle or the bear.

I've had numerous close calls, but never actually connected. I was hit by a deer once. It ran into my driver side door. The expression on it's face was very comical. Again, no damage.

Now, a venison stew, ah, I'm salivating... I lived in Upper Michigan for a few years and venison was a staple. Cooked properly, it's very good. Oh yeah, Ted Nugent had a camp in a town called "Rock" smack dab in the middle of the peninsula.   

Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 18 2004 at 14:48

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

 

 Do you guys have such deer over population problems in your country where it starts killing your motorists in a big way because they unexpectantly step out onto a highway? We do in Wisconsin. )

I've still no wish to enter this debate.Wink

You might find this article interesting though GDUB.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3722704.stm

Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 21:15
I don't know, Danbo.. I've always preferred my metal warm...
THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
Dan Bobrowski View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 21:14
I've never pulled my weapon out in anger. Now, in love, is a totally different thing!
Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 21:10
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

The right to bear arms....Confused

The Constitution has to be put into historical context.When the Constitution was put in place the USA was a far more civilised place.LOL

FUNNY ISNT IT?

All you Yanks defending the right to bear arms but not giving a fig for

FREEDOM OF SPEECHWink

OLA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Evidently we Yanks really appreciate the "Freedom of Speech" law... afterall you'r still alive, aren't ya ??

THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 20:40

Reed Lover said:What first drew you to A Larger Bowel ?

Somehow I missed this question. Mind games sir Reed Lover..mind games

It's supposed to be a half planet...ya think I should change it? I've kind of warmed up to it now.

By the way...did you resolve those issues?

Back to Top
Paradox View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1059
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 20:29
smashed bottle???
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 20:11
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Thanks Peter, we make a good mutual admiration society!LOL

Whoops! I gushed girlishly over your reviews before, didn't I? I tend to get yourself and the well-seasoned Wink Dick Heath (Heath/McBeath -- Good grief!) mixed up!Embarrassed

Not so much spare time as miss-spent I think. I really should fix that hole in the roof from last year sometime!Wink

Geek Yes, do that, and buy a dictionary to look up the spelling of words like "misspent," too!Stern SmileLOL

Now: Let the great Internet Progressive Rock Firearms Ownership Debate rage on! On one side, the well-armed, Redcoat and deer-fearing Americans, on the other, the out-gunned (but feisty) smashed-bottle Brits (there's no guns in this gentlemen's bout....) and clog-wearing, "man-purse"-sporting Europeans.Wink

Oy! Such slaughter! What a senseless waste of human life....

OK, back to reality, Rideout!Ouch

"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 17:04

Thanks Peter, we make a good mutual admiration society!LOL

Not so much spare time as miss-spent I think. I really should fix that hole in the roof from last year sometime!Wink

Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 16:26
Originally posted by Paradox Paradox wrote:

I started this post because its something i am interested about. Living in England, where guns are not readily available to everyone, i find the contrast between English and American law fascinating.
It wasn't my intention to "poison" any atmosphere at all. I find your outspoken comments annoyings and pointless. Leave my bladder and bowel problems out of this.
As others have said before me, if you dont want to get upset by the opinions of other people, and dont feel you can rationally debate a subject which many people have a view on, then dont open topics of that nature.   

[/QUOTE]

Paradox: Consider me duly chastised. Sorry to have misread/annoyed/offended you. (See my later posts, above.)Ouch

Welcome, & carry on with the debate! Smile

 

Easy Livin': SmileThanks for the understanding & kind words! As you suggested, I guess I will "jump in" and post from time to time, as moved to do so (& as time allows), but I'll avoid such controversial, non-music-related topics, because I'm really not into debating them with strangers on a music (or any) forum (others are, I understand), and I always seem to offend someone when I take offense....Stern Smile

See you on the Reviews page, & GREAT reviews, BTW, Easy!Big smile Clap

Ermm So many! You must have lots of spare time, comrade? Wink

"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2004 at 16:09
Paradox....be nice to Peter...he apologized already
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.