Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - REMOVE RATING-ONLY-REVIEWS?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedREMOVE RATING-ONLY-REVIEWS?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
Poll Question: REMOVE RATING-ONLY-REVIEWS?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
81 [71.05%]
25 [21.93%]
8 [7.02%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20438
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 15:49
Originally posted by Winter Wine Winter Wine wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ as soon as they are no longer used in the calculation, there is no need anymore to abuse them. I agree that they would be rather unimportant ... but there is no NEED to remove them.


OK DON'T REMOVE THEM, BUT DON'T COUNT THEM, THAT's MOST IMPORTANT!

Agreed.

Also agreed

I could live with that, too

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Moatilliatta View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 14:37
So I was just about to post my first review for Pelican, and I noticed that the ratings have been significantly lowered by this guy named  "Kinetic," whom I have seen around other albums doing the same thing. It's getting pretty ridiculous.
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 14:31

^ the problem with greenback's review is that most of the things which he dislikes are common for that kind of music. An "unmelodious rhythm guitar" ... this makes no sense to me whatsoever. "unconvincing TV" ... how can a TV sample be unconvincing? And then the hilarious sentence where he tries to insinuate that the album is basically one big ripoff ... ending with the "symphonic Malmsteen himself", which is again a contradictory, non-sense term.

See? All of what I said here could be argued about. Neither you or me are authorities who can define what's nonsense and what is not.

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 14:23
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Dear Ivan,

please note the 1 star review of greenback for a 5 star album (Devin Townsend - Terria). Who are you to judge whether a 1 star rating is valid or not?

I never judge the ratings unless they are obviously stupid (remember the flawed thread), I'm in favour of reviewing, Have you read my previous posts?.

But if a guy said that Close to the Edge is bad because Jon Andeson sounds like a Woman or because the songs are too long..........That's a stupid argument.

I always said I  respect people who dare to give low or high ratings making a review, because they are assuming a risk and its' clear when the person has a valid argument or he's simply talking crap.

Compare:

THIS IS A PILE OF CRAP

YES Close to the Edge
Review (Permanent link) by Hawkeye @ 6:26:40 PM EST, 8/31/2005

1 stars  —  Well, here is is folks- the MOST OVERATED ALBUM ON THIS SITE. Easy..no doubt about it. The "epic" close to the edge- starts as a headache- the 1st 3 minutes sound like a truck filled with musical instruments colliding with a wall- its horrible- not untill the femanistic vocals come in does the song take a slight change for the better. Yes- he sounds like a woman. The lyrics are not as 'deep' as everyone says- instead, they are rather basic- most liekly sophistcated to an 8th grader. Dont try to analyze "Seasons Change..I get up..I get Down" ust meaningless lyrics. The rest of the album is DULL- nothing great here at all- but a headache, and an oveerated pile of trash.

BLAH!!!
 
This guy is too general (A truck collisioning agains a wall) why??' What instrument sounds bad, Why headache? What's the problem with having a high ranged voice (I don't like them, but I take my time to explain this)?
 
No serious reviewer will end with a BLAH!!!!
 
________
 
This one says nothing:
 
YES Close to the Edge
Review (Permanent link) by Mike @ 10:38:46 PM EST, 6/15/2005

2 stars  —  2.75-- These songs have some amazing parts capable of evoking intense emotion, but I fail to see why it is so revered. Some serious editing was needed here. Instead we get interminable passages at the end of which one is left reaching for the snooze button.
 
Nothing, simply nothing about the album.
 
______________________________________
 
This is a review that makes sense even ifyou disagree:
 
DEVIN TOWNSEND Terria
Review (Permanent link) by greenback @ 12:35:41 AM EST, 12/24/2005

SPECIAL COLLABORATION
1 stars  —  This music describes the best what is a monolithic electric guitar! I have never heard a more monolithic electric rhythmic guitar than on this record: that's completely ridiculous! This brutal guitar is so distorted and polluted with tons of useless effects that it takes all the available room! As if it was not enough, the musician seems to take a huge pleasure to exaggeratedly sustain each note, a painful torment for the ears! The rhythmic guitar is COMPLETELY unmelodious. The lead vocals are just simply too angry and aggressive for me. When the lead vocals are more mellow, they amazingly remind me David Gilmour and James LaBrie. There are some good acoustic guitar parts. There are some unconvincing TV or radio sounds, a much worse copy of Roger Waters' effects: they seem too coarsely produced. You can hear some whales-like sounds. There are some rare good passages, so that, globally, this record is not worth a complete listen. The only track that retained more my attention is "Deep peace", starting with an imitation of David Gilmour's voice; an Oldfield-esque guitar solo then begins, followed by an Hillage-esque one, featuring his spacy ambience from the "Green" album; then, it changes to a VERY modest & much slower attempt to emulate the symphonic Yngwie Malmsteen himself. This VERY rebel music is probably perfect for the young people who like disturbing moods.

Rating: 1.5 star
 
He takes the time to describe each instrument, the vocals, the sound, similarities, etc, it's obvious he hates the album, but waht's the problem?
_______________________
 
My whole point is that at least you got a review to make an idea about the reviewer, but in RWR you have no base, no idea, the guy may never even heard the album and simply hates Yes or Genesis, so he gives on star.
 
Iván
 
 
            
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 13:53
Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Let's check some of the top albums:

  • Close to the Edge: I believe it's a 5 stars album:
    • Most Reviewers rated it with 4 or 5 stars
    • Nine reviewers rated it with 3 stars
    • One 2 star review (Another guy who complains that the songs are too long )
    • One 1 star review by an idiot who says Jon sounds like a woman
    • Ratings without Reviews: Eleven RWR gave Close to the Edge 1 star.
  • Selling England by the Pound: Not my favorite Genesis album but can't give it less than 4 stars but...
    • The review ratings are 4 or  5 stars (Most 5 stars)
    • Three that rate it with 3 stars because they believe it's overrated
    • One reviewer gives 2 stars but he's obviously  a troll who doesn't know what he's talking about because he doesn't even know the name of the songs
    • RwR (Nine RWR give 1 star??????)
  • Thick as a Brick: No review under 3 stars (Tonly 2 reviewrs gave it 3 stars)
    • RWR: Four 2 stars and four 1 star????
  • Dark Side of the Moon: Eleven 3 stars, one 2 stars and one 1 star  are the lowes reviers gave (The last one is a Floyd hater).
    • RWR: Nine RWR gave 1 star???? and a whole bunch of 2 stars.

It's clear, Ratings without reviews go against the normal average of an album, and exceed by far the low ratings given by reviewers.

Iván

 

Dear Ivan,

please note the 1 star review of greenback for a 5 star album (Devin Townsend - Terria). Who are you to judge whether a 1 star rating is valid or not?

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20471
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 13:50

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I think that as long as these ratings are used in the calculations, there will be abuse.

yep, I have just deleted about 200 of them!....

Symphony X albums have fallen down the chart even quicker than they have risen over the past few days...

Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 13:50

Let's check some of the top albums:

  • Close to the Edge: I believe it's a 5 stars album:
    • Most Reviewers rated it with 4 or 5 stars
    • Nine reviewers rated it with 3 stars
    • One 2 star review (Another guy who complains that the songs are too long )
    • One 1 star review by an idiot who says Jon sounds like a woman
    • Ratings without Reviews: Eleven RWR gave Close to the Edge 1 star.
  • Selling England by the Pound: Not my favorite Genesis album but can't give it less than 4 stars but...
    • The review ratings are 4 or  5 stars (Most 5 stars)
    • Three that rate it with 3 stars because they believe it's overrated
    • One reviewer gives 2 stars but he's obviously  a troll who doesn't know what he's talking about because he doesn't even know the name of the songs
    • RwR (Nine RWR give 1 star??????)
  • Thick as a Brick: No review under 3 stars (Tonly 2 reviewrs gave it 3 stars)
    • RWR: Four 2 stars and four 1 star????
  • Dark Side of the Moon: Eleven 3 stars, one 2 stars and one 1 star  are the lowes reviers gave (The last one is a Floyd hater).
    • RWR: Nine RWR gave 1 star???? and a whole bunch of 2 stars.

It's clear, Ratings without reviews go against the normal average of an album, and exceed by far the low ratings given by reviewers.

Iván

 



Edited by ivan_2068
            
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 13:35
^ I think that as long as these ratings are used in the calculations, there will be abuse.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 13:19

Originally posted by W.Chuck W.Chuck wrote:

What's the admins opinion about NOT COUNTING them?

Collectively, Tony, Trotsky and myself agree the issue needs to be addressed.

Personally, I think we have more chance of persuading M@X to reduce their impact, rather than excluding them all together.

Back to Top
moodyxadi View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 417
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 12:12
I think everything has been said... Allowing reviews with not-so-good English but that make sense, and not counting the rating only reviews to the ranking, but not banishing them as well.
Back to Top
Genesisprog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 14 2005
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 11:19

There are some persons who dont think what points do they give.

Some put 1 ,other 5

5 means masterpeace -you cant put thoughtlessly 5 to albums.

I put also only points,but I didnt write review.My english is not that good to describe my feelings about albums.

Some jerks think that  pointgiving is NUMBER GAME

They put 5,51,,5,5 ,4,1, and again 5,5,5 etc. Look Rick Wakemans page for example. 

 

Frank Zappa,Pink Floyd,Yes,Genesis,Rush,King Crimson,Jethro Tull,E.L.P,Rick Wakeman -They have one similarity-    I Love Them all !
Back to Top
Zitro View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 11 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1321
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 11:12

I voted Yes, because You mostly get the 1star reviews from them (just to bring the rating down). Close to the Edge, and many Dream Theater Albums suffer from this.

 

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:33

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I think that these ratings should be allowed, but not be used in the calculation of the average rating. This would also mean that the old ratings would not have to be removed.
Best idea yet!


actually,that's an idea everyone eventually gets to...
 

That only shows that it might make sense. BTW: It's not my idea ... someone else suggested it and I picked it up.

Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:22
Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I think that these ratings should be allowed, but not be used in the calculation of the average rating. This would also mean that the old ratings would not have to be removed.
Best idea yet!


actually,that's an idea everyone eventually gets to...
 
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:20
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I think that these ratings should be allowed, but not be used in the calculation of the average rating. This would also mean that the old ratings would not have to be removed.
Best idea yet!
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:15
Exactly.Except that obvious case of zabriskie...,who tried to manipulte the charts,you cannot evaluate a RwR...I personally cannot call the person who votes 1* something spammer,troll,etc...if he has not supported his rating with any message...it's a major problem.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:12
The problem is that a rating cannot be argued about. As long as the reviewer shows that he/she has really listened to the album and the review contains some information about the album, the rating is valid ... no matter what some of us may think about it. Even if it is obviously an attempt at manipulation - like for example somewone who rates CttE 1 star, and SEbtP 5 stars.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:09
Originally posted by Winter Wine Winter Wine wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by henri_ds henri_ds wrote:

I'm totally for it. Enough of the **** who put 1 star on every album of one band just because they hate the band.


but...disliking the band/album usually justifies the 1* star rating...
 

Ah but Ricochet, you could easily just dislike a band for silly reasons. For example if someone were a big Klause schulze fan () and there was a poll in which Rick wakeman beat him that person may come to dislike Wakeman, and give unjustified ratings.

It's already happened, some guy gave Floyds albums masterpiece ratings and Yes' and Genesis' albums 1* ratings to try put Pink Floyd ahead. Stupid really.



A fair and possible situation...but not in all cases.
 

Edited by Easy Livin
Back to Top
W.Chuck View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:07
Originally posted by Ray Lomas Ray Lomas wrote:


I think many people who come from non-english speaking countries are
too shy in using english.


Why should people be shy? Nobody can see their e-mail adress and there's just a name, and the name is free-to-chose (of course nothing racist, etc.). So you can chose a NICKNAME you like and nobody will know who you are!

Originally posted by Ray Lomas Ray Lomas wrote:


And a lot of these people seem to write
better english than some americans. I
think it doesn't matter that much if there are some grammar errors. If
you understand the main reasons why someone likes/doesn't like an
album, it's OK.


Yes, so far you can still understand it, grammatic faults are not worse!

Back to Top
Winter Wine View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 1140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 07 2006 at 10:04

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by henri_ds henri_ds wrote:

I'm totally for it. Enough of the people who put 1 star on every album of one band just because they hate the band.


but...disliking the band/album usually justifies the 1* star rating...
 

Ah but Ricochet, you could easily just dislike a band for silly reasons. For example if someone were a big Klause schulze fan () and there was a poll in which Rick wakeman beat him that person may come to dislike Wakeman, and give unjustified ratings.

It's already happened, some guy gave Floyds albums masterpiece ratings and Yes' and Genesis' albums 1* ratings to try put Pink Floyd ahead. Stupid really.



Edited by Easy Livin
My computer's broke
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.324 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.