Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Recommended "MP3" player for prog use?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRecommended "MP3" player for prog use?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 22 2006 at 04:26
Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

He means hardware system rather than a conceptual one.

Yes, that's what i meant. I don't speak about theories and mathematical formulas, i don't mind about it.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 22 2006 at 04:24
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by The-Bullet The-Bullet wrote:


Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

To sum up: -Separate electric lines give a strong upgrade on dynamic, image (at least 30% more!!!) -Power filtering removes A LOT OF harshness (it's very useful on CD and you can double and even triple filter, each time it's softer )and you upgrade also on dynamic, detail, transparency. These are huge upgrade on a musical system (not necessary expensive). A good system CAN'T works without that. A big system without power optimization is a joke. And, yes when i plug the washing machines or the computer while i listen, it degrades sound wheras i've got separated lines...strange isn't it? it's actually because the different electric lines/devices disturb itselves at the level of the home counter. Top power filter by Transparent audio:


I've not done A/B tests on power filtration and the like so I can't comment one way or the other, but there is a heck of a lot of debate out there refering to double blind tests and the fact that rarely if ever can people tell when such devices are used. These sceptics point to the fact that people only "hear" these differences when they are aware visually what equipment is being used.


The problem is you have to have a good system to perform valid tests. So, what was the set up?


It is all described in the pdf that I linked to above:


"<FONT face=AGaramond-Regular size=2>The ABX methodology requires device A and device B to be levelmatched within ±0.1 dB, after which you can listen to fully identified A and fully identified B for as long as you like. If you then think they sound different, you are asked to identify X, <FONT face=AGaramond-Regular size=2>which may be either A or B (as determined by a double-blind randomization process). You are allowed to make an A/X or B/X comparison at any time, as many times as you like, to decide whether X=A or X=B. Since sheer guessing will yield the correct answer 50% of the time, a minimum of 12 trials is needed for statistical validity (16 is better, 20 better yet). There is no better way to determine scientifically whether you are just claiming to hear a difference or can actually hear one."



Without a minimum of neutrality and transparency on the system, these tests means nothing.

Edited by oliverstoned
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2006 at 22:30
He means hardware system rather than a conceptual one.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2006 at 12:44
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by The-Bullet The-Bullet wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

To sum up: -Separate electric lines give a strong upgrade on dynamic, image (at least 30% more!!!) -Power filtering removes A LOT OF harshness (it's very useful on CD and you can double and even triple filter, each time it's softer )and you upgrade also on dynamic, detail, transparency. These are huge upgrade on a musical system (not necessary expensive). A good system CAN'T works without that. A big system without power optimization is a joke. And, yes when i plug the washing machines or the computer while i listen, it degrades sound wheras i've got separated lines...strange isn't it? it's actually because the different electric lines/devices disturb itselves at the level of the home counter. Top power filter by Transparent audio:


I've not done A/B tests on power filtration and the like so I can't comment one way or the other, but there is a heck of a lot of debate out there refering to double blind tests and the fact that rarely if ever can people tell when such devices are used. These sceptics point to the fact that people only "hear" these differences when they are aware visually what equipment is being used.



The problem is you have to have a good system to perform valid tests. So, what was the set up?

It is all described in the pdf that I linked to above:

"The ABX methodology requires device A and device B to be levelmatched within ±0.1 dB, after which you can listen to fully identified A and fully identified B for as long as you like. If you then think they sound different, you are asked to identify X, which may be either A or B (as determined by a double-blind randomization process). You are allowed to make an A/X or B/X comparison at any time, as many times as you like, to decide whether X=A or X=B. Since sheer guessing will yield the correct answer 50% of the time, a minimum of 12 trials is needed for statistical validity (16 is better, 20 better yet). There is no better way to determine scientifically whether you are just claiming to hear a difference or can actually hear one."

Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2006 at 12:39
I have an ipod (20 gigs) and it is almost full. I now wish i got one of those creatives. Not because the sound is better or any defect of the ipod, just because its cheaper and hold alot more (obviously depending on which one you get). Once the ipod dies, i will probably replace it for a creative.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 21 2006 at 04:51
Originally posted by The-Bullet The-Bullet wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

To sum up: -Separate electric lines give a strong upgrade on dynamic, image (at least 30% more!!!) -Power filtering removes A LOT OF harshness (it's very useful on CD and you can double and even triple filter, each time it's softer )and you upgrade also on dynamic, detail, transparency. These are huge upgrade on a musical system (not necessary expensive). A good system CAN'T works without that. A big system without power optimization is a joke. And, yes when i plug the washing machines or the computer while i listen, it degrades sound wheras i've got separated lines...strange isn't it? it's actually because the different electric lines/devices disturb itselves at the level of the home counter. Top power filter by Transparent audio:


I've not done A/B tests on power filtration and the like so I can't comment one way or the other, but there is a heck of a lot of debate out there refering to double blind tests and the fact that rarely if ever can people tell when such devices are used. These sceptics point to the fact that people only "hear" these differences when they are aware visually what equipment is being used.



The problem is you have to have a good system to perform valid tests. So, what was the set up?
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 21:23
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I know what you mean re the TV and microwave oven. But I never heard any of those effects on my hifi system, which is cheap and mediocre by purist standards (Harman-Kardon).


I'm really sure that why there's room for small improvements in that area, they're barely audible and really don't justify the unreal cost factor of these "devices".


Sometimes the effects will be more noticeable than others. A lot of the time they aren't audible at all, but they still exist, and the article says that's impossible!
Originally posted by ulver982 ulver982 wrote:

How bout encoding the mp3s to a 320 bit rate?  Isn't that considered CD quality?

Wether it's considered CD quality or not, it isn't. For nearly everyone, on nearly all equipment, for most recordings, 320kbps certainly will be perceptually CD quality, but there's definitely no single value of data you can throw away without noticing it. After all, Microsoft said WMA was CD quality at 64kbps!

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by ulver982 ulver982 wrote:

How bout encoding the mp3s to a 320 bit rate?  Isn't that considered CD quality?


Not exactly. Theoretically anything >=128kbps has been labeled "CD-quality". The only true CD-quality formats are WMA Lossless, Apple Lossless and FLAC, as far as I know. The average bitrate of these formats is 1000kbps.


Having said that: I think that anything >=192kbps is close enough to the CD for the use in mobile players.


There are a fair number of lossless formats; FLAC, TTA, Shorten, Monkey's Audio, MKW (although I don't think anyone except Mr. MKW himself uses this ) as well as some corporate ones which are almost comparable: Real lossless, ALAC and WMA lossless. As far as I know, Monkey's Audio and TTA tend to get the best compression rates, and TTA is certainly much faster than FLAC to compress. The main problem is that no one supports either of them .
Back to Top
The-Bullet View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 23 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 20:21

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:



To sum up:

-Separate electric lines give a strong upgrade on dynamic, image (at least 30% more!!!)

-Power filtering removes A LOT OF harshness (it's very useful on CD and you can double and even triple filter, each time it's softer )and you upgrade also on dynamic, detail, transparency.

These are huge upgrade on a musical system (not necessary expensive).

A good system CAN'T works without that.

A big system without power optimization is a joke.

And, yes when i plug the washing machines or the computer while i listen, it degrades sound wheras i've got separated lines...strange isn't it? it's actually because
the different electric lines/devices disturb itselves at the level of the home counter.



Top power filter by Transparent audio:

I've not done A/B tests on power filtration and the like so I can't comment one way or the other, but there is a heck of a lot of debate out there refering to double blind tests and the fact that rarely if ever can people tell when such devices are used. These sceptics point to the fact that people only "hear" these differences when they are aware visually what equipment is being used.


"Why say it cannot be done.....they'd be better doing pop songs?"
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 17:12

Since Christmas, I've found that the Creative MuVo TX SE has a superb, rich sound, for an mp3 player - especially considering it's only £40-odd worth of kit...

Works VERY well with Sennheisers too...

Windows XP SP2 systems on recent motherboards recognise it instantly, with no software, and file copying happens at 480Mb/sec.

Allegedly.



Edited by Certif1ed
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 16:35
I'm listening to music woth my mobile player a lot ... I guess maybe even more than 50% of my entire listening time. Two albums a day, usually.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 16:25
I agree with you.

Although when i'm on holidays into the country, far from my home and my system, i'd apreciate to walk into the fields, from times to times, with a good Sennheiser HD 600 on the head...

The problem to find a good portable source...not sure it exists.
Back to Top
proger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 13:35
I dont like MP3 player...
I perefer to listen my muisic a home.
...live for tomorrow...
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 12:52
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I know what you mean re the TV and microwave oven. But I never heard any of those effects on my hifi system, which is cheap and mediocre by purist standards (Harman-Kardon).


I'm really sure that why there's room for small improvements in that area, they're barely audible and really don't justify the unreal cost factor of these "devices".



On a great system, these improvmenst are dramatic.

That's why i worked a lot in my house to install separated elecric lines dedicated for my system.
(the best is to have one per device, and 4mm or even 6mm square section for devices which need much power, such as amps and subwoofers).

The explanation is very simple. Two things:

-For the devices which need a lot of power and have strong power "calls" (like amps), when you have two amps on the same line, they have to share it and so disturb each other. When one makes a strong power call,the other suffers. (It's also the biwire principle).

-The fact to separate tham from each other also prevents for mutual pollution.
Especially digital devices which pollute a lot due to the kind of power alimentation used in.

Then you have the power filtering issue which plays in the second point evoked up, which is to isolate devices between themselves.


To sum up:

-Separate electric lines give a strong upgrade on dynamic, image (at least 30% more!!!)

-Power filtering removes A LOT OF harshness (it's very useful on CD and you can double and even triple filter, each time it's softer )and you upgrade also on dynamic, detail, transparency.

These are huge upgrade on a musical system (not necessary expensive).

A good system CAN'T works without that.

A big system without power optimization is a joke.

And, yes when i plug the washing machines or the computer while i listen, it degrades sound wheras i've got separated lines...strange isn't it? it's actually because
the different electric lines/devices disturb itselves at the level of the home counter.



Top power filter by Transparent audio:


Edited by oliverstoned
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 12:29

Originally posted by ulver982 ulver982 wrote:

How bout encoding the mp3s to a 320 bit rate?  Isn't that considered CD quality?

Not exactly. Theoretically anything >=128kbps has been labeled "CD-quality". The only true CD-quality formats are WMA Lossless, Apple Lossless and FLAC, as far as I know. The average bitrate of these formats is 1000kbps.

Having said that: I think that anything >=192kbps is close enough to the CD for the use in mobile players.

Back to Top
ulver982 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 12:26
How bout encoding the mp3s to a 320 bit rate?  Isn't that considered CD quality?
Improvement makes straight roads, but the crooked roads without improvement, are roads of genius.

Silence is the music of the future.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 11:58

^ I know what you mean re the TV and microwave oven. But I never heard any of those effects on my hifi system, which is cheap and mediocre by purist standards (Harman-Kardon).

I'm really sure that why there's room for small improvements in that area, they're barely audible and really don't justify the unreal cost factor of these "devices".

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 11:41
Well, err, I wouldn't go quite so far
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 05:26
Power optimization is very important and has fantastic effects on sound.

I use separated electric lines and power filters.

When you use sophisticated power filters, you can remove all the harshness on a system, even on digital!!!

Ther's also more dynamic, image, detail, etc...

Edited by oliverstoned
Back to Top
Bob Greece View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 05:16

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

Have you never turned on (e.g.) a microwave and seen the TV picture flicker? I don't know how much it really costs to isolate the power supply, and I'm sure it's less than hifi manufacturers charge, but despite how it seems, even through a transformer interference can affect things on the other side, if it's high enough level.

Someone I know did have a separate power source for the Hi-Fi system. The electricians thought he was mad. I just put batteries in my MP3 player.

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 20 2006 at 04:26
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

You can't ignore facts!
Prove it!
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

claims that aren't sufficiently explored (analogue to digital conversion makes no audible difference because of the Nyquist theorem, yet making no reference to bit depth; burn ins are irrelevant despite the possibility of changing temperatures affecting the electrical performance of components (I'm not saying this does make a difference, but there's nothing to say it doesn't!)),



It's not a scientific paper.

Even so, I think it's a little bold to make these claims. If it goes into more detail at other points, then perhaps it makes sense, but I don't know that
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

as well as a downright untruth ("digital data pits' background silence", as if CD had an infinite noise floor ,



Not infinite, surely. But if there is "0" on the disc, there is absolutely no noise at all. Any noise will be added by the amplifier, not the source.

That's true for a completely silent disc (or at least I assume so; I don't know why anyone would make one, really! . But if you have any audio there's still quantisation distortion or noise between the 0 sample and the one before it and/or the one after it - very low level, true enough, but when something gets argued about so much it's best not to spread misinformation
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


Originally posted by goose goose wrote:


"your audio circuts... don't know what's on the ac side of the power transformer" - if we assume no capacitance whatsoever along anything touching the circuit, that is).



I think that what he meant was that nothing that's on the ac side could possible affect your listening experience. Of course there can be power surges or dropouts, and depending on the quality of your power transformer they might affect your circuitry, but this is really no issue for modern "middle-class" hifi components. You don't need any other equipment than that, that's the basic message.

Have you never turned on (e.g.) a microwave and seen the TV picture flicker? I don't know how much it really costs to isolate the power supply, and I'm sure it's less than hifi manufacturers charge, but despite how it seems, even through a transformer interference can affect things on the other side, if it's high enough level.
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:


Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

Well that's a turnup for the books eh? I'm agreeing with oliver for the... third time? (although only in places of course )


Don't give him your little finger! (a proverb in Germany ... if you give someone your little finger he might take the whole hand).

Give them an inch, and they'll take a yard
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.