Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Juhqli
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 28
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 16:20 |
In General I enjoy much more Shine on but i voted that they are very
different. I can't say Shine on is more EXCITING than CttE cause
sometimes i find it a bit boring. But when i'm in the right mood, i
love it! Ctte is an exciting song and very different from Shine on and
Yes is very different from Pink Floyd.
IMO Pink Floyd wasn't very progressive, whereas yes was a bunch of
virtuosos. Perhaps that's why it's often a bit too heavy for me and why
i prefer more pink floyd.
|
|
Philrod
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 319
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 16:09 |
Shine on. No contest.
|
|
|
chessman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 974
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 16:05 |
For many years I was not keen on Shine On, and I have always loved Close To The Edge. However, over the last few years I have quite taken to Shine On, and now I have actually voted for it over Close To The Edge. It certainly has more feel to it, some excellent guitar and keyboard work, and a nice relaxed tempo. Close To The Edge is still excellent, but must take second place here methinks. A hard one to call really, Yes used to be my second fave band, with Floyd third. Now, Floyd have taken the second spot from Jon's lads. Hard to compare however as both bands are so different. Just enjoy the music! (Of course, Genesis is still my number one.)
|
|
-bp-
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 10 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 95
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 15:50 |
You also allowed multiple votes... I love both songs, Shine on has a great feel to it and I go completly crazy when I play guitar over the track it's AMAZING. Close to the Edge has some beautiful parts in it as well...It really depends on my mood
|
|
|
Pr@gmatic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 04 2005
Location: Virgin Islands
Status: Offline
Points: 1023
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 15:40 |
Conclusion: Taste is subjective.
|
|
eduardossc
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 15:28 |
This is surprising. "Shine" is kicking "Closeīs" butt here.
Conclusion: Feeling and emotions are more important factors than complexity and energy in music.
|
|
Pr@gmatic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 04 2005
Location: Virgin Islands
Status: Offline
Points: 1023
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 15:23 |
I enjoy both the same way, actually.
|
|
krusty
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 14:55 |
Yeah, I'll go with Shine on as well. Just love Gilmore's guitar work on this one.
|
|
|
el axel
Forum Newbie
Joined: September 12 2005
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 4
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 12:59 |
first of all, i think the feeling will always be better and much important than the technic or the way of playing, but if you mix them and create a song with a lot of sense and technic with all the heart, it's done. and close to the edge, it's one of those, it's not only better, it's much better than "shine",, and i do love "shine". Thatīs only my opinion
a prog lover, a music lover, a life lover , axel &n bsp; seeya
|
the peruavian progfan
|
|
eduardossc
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
|
Posted: October 11 2005 at 12:31 |
Another "Close to the edge" face to face poll. why not?
Iīd like to read explicit arguments on this. If possible, donīt just pick one. It would really help the arguments.
Actually, I donīt really care about which is better. I think the most interesting debates start from simple and common issues whenever the counterparties really get involved.
Edited by eduardossc
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.