Four non English prog bands from the 70's......... |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
However one wants to classify them, they were able to blend rock and jazz in an interesting way. My definition of Prog is a pretty wide net. Of course, here you have on one end of the spectrum, some die-hards who like the Big 6 and a few “second tier” groups, and that’s as far as Prog goes up to the late 70s. That’s fine. It’s all a matter of personal opinion and experience. Probably bragging rights comes into it a bit. And, those who shout the loudest tend to be heard the most. But, let’s not forget the art of listening, the context in which the music was written (location, time, circumstances) and try to be fair. I have one foot in the UK and one foot in the USA, and it is interesting to me to see how progressive music developed in both countries, as well as other parts of the world. The history is, after all, very different. I enjoy hearing from people who discuss proggy bands from all over. It is a good way to discover new music, even if that “new music” might be decades old in some cases.
|
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
In my mind there's a difference between pure fusion and jazz rock. At one point the two terms were more or less synonymous(kind of like prog and art rock)but then later came to be known as two separate although related entities. Chicago were originally doing what was called horn rock(same thing with BS&T) but I think jazz rock applies. Scroll down to the jazz rock section here(about mid way through the page). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazz_fusion#Jazz_rock They don't mention Steely Dan but I think they qualify also. I wouldn't necessarily put either of them in the same grouping as Mahavishnu Orchestra or Return to Forever either.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 09 2020 at 10:53 |
||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Agree
|
||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
||
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 07 2019 Location: Culver City, CA Status: Offline Points: 3036 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Would hesitate to call Steely Dan a fusion group. Same as Chicago. The Dan are like jazz-inflected art rock/pop. Suppose I'm splitting hairs here anyway hehe.
|
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Fortunately with PA there is a deep vein of Prog to mine and explore. It’s all gathered in one place, rather than scattered incoherently amongst varied pop/rock/jazz/etc genres.
|
||
siLLy puPPy
Special Collaborator PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic Joined: October 05 2013 Location: SFcaUsA Status: Offline Points: 15242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I just listened to MOVING WAVES (Focus II) the other day for the first time in years. Still one of the best prog albums to emerge from the Dutch world.
|
||
https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy |
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
BOC got quite a bit of airplay but your on the fringe again there.
|
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
There was great popular music in other genres, but most of the Prog ... other than the bands we mentioned earlier ... was coming from Britain. You’d hear elements of Prog in bands like Toto and Styx. Rush was thrown in with the hard rock/early metal folks. There was no Prog radio to speak of. You’d catch glimpses of Yes, JT, PF, etc. here and there. King Crimson was nowhere to be found until MTV came along. Early Genesis didn’t exist for me in the US until curiosity made me explore their earlier catalogue. I discovered Sky by accident through my interest in classical guitar. With the internet, we’re really spoiled!
|
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ok, I stand corrected. Klaatu did have some chart success in the US so they officially count.
Edit: Klaatu are prog related on here so they don't count. This is started to feel like a ping pong game. Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 20:26 |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Well for US bands I can't think of many others. Starcastle is worth mentioning but I don't see any evidence they charted despite the fact that there albums sold pretty well at the time and they opened for a lot of bands. Also, Happy the Man are considered to be one of the best american prog bands of all time but I don't think they charted either. They were initially supposed to be Peter Gabriel's backing band but that fell through. Nonetheless it led to them being ona major label and that helped but outside of the DC/Virginia area I don't think they became very well known(except in prog circles). Crack the Sky were similar in that they had local success in a few states and while I don't know if they charted in the 70's a couple of their later albums made it to the far end of the billboard charts which is why I included them. Someone mentioned Saga. It looks like they charted in the 80's in the US but not earlier. I'm not sure about Klaatu(also Canadian)but I don't think they charted. I do know they at least achieved some notoriety for fooling some people(inadvertently probably)into thinking they were really the Beatles. That kind of publicity while totally false probably did at least make some people wonder who they were. FM were an important Canadian band also but I don't think they charted either. Max Webster while not fully prog did achieve some pretty big success in Canada but I think they had very little if any real success in the US.
|
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Psychedelic rabbit hole. That’s funny! I think of Jefferson Airplane like that but Jefferson Starship was more organized in their music, I think. Not really a Prog Band per se, but they played some music that was proggy at times.
Glass Harp toured with a lot of people who charted but I didn’t find anything either. Maybe they were number one on the Christian Prog charts or something. So ... you’ve exhausted the supply then? Probably makes sense. It was the disco era. People in the States were more interested in rock versus disco versus urban cowboy versus soul. Prog elements found their way into rock but few were interested in going too far out on a limb. The radio format favored shorter popular songs, I suppose. |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Focus was one of the original four bands I mentioned on the first post of the first page.
|
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
They are maybe worth mentioning but if we mention them we also have to mention the Grateful Dead and then also the Doors and then things will just snowball from there. Of course Spirit would have to be mentioned too and it just gets to be one big proto psycho-delic rabbit hole. So anyway, JA are on here as proto prog but JS aren't on here at all I don't think. Maybe prog related would be appropriate but they didn't even pop up for that in a search. I didn't know Glass Harp had any charting albums. So far I haven't seen anything saying they did. I've heard of them for sure especially since Phil Keaggy has made a name for himself in christian music circles and even collaborated with some prog guys(including Neal Morse but also Tony Levin & Jerry Marotta(both of whom played with Peter Gabriel). To answer your question no Jefferson Starship would not make my list. However, you can add them to your list if you want but based on my knowledge of the genre I would not consider them prog over all. I understand they had some progressive material but so did Led Zeppelin and the Who and neither of them are typically considered prog either.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 19:31 |
||
BrufordFreak
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 25 2008 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 8189 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
FOCUS, people, FOCUS!!!
And then there was the whole Jazz-Rock Fusion scene--which included a lot of European bands (thanks to Manfred Eicher's ECM label). Also, Jean-Luc Ponty was doing medium size venues to promote his very popular albums in the late 70s and early 80s. TD may not have been included under the prog rock label (yet) but they were quite popular in the record stores.
|
||
Drew Fisher
https://progisaliveandwell.blogspot.com/ |
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If that’s what you’re going for, I think that’s fair enough. They can sort of go either way, depending on your personal tastes. Just curious. What do you think about Jefferson Starship? In hindsight, would you include them on your list?
Glass Harp another group. Edited by Jaketejas - July 08 2020 at 19:00 |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As I said before Styx had some prog songs but over all not prog imo(maybe that's why they are only prog related on here). Steely Dan are jazz fusion like I said before also. Some stuff was proggy but over all I have a tough time thinking of Steely Dan as prog.
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 18:08 |
||
Jaketejas
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 27 2018 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 1988 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Once again, another thought-provoking list. Chicago and Styx were extremely popular in the 1970s, but they are, as has been said by others, more on the fringe. They definitely had many proggy moments. Some people prefer to call Chicago jazz. I think Styx probably deserves to be in there. Some might make a similar argument for Boston, but that's pushing it. It does remind me of a guy who used to ONLY listen to Chicago and Boston. Weird.
Jefferson Starship was a biggie Saga (Canadian) was around then, but didn't become very popular until the late 70s/early 80s transition period. Another possible entry might be Sky, with their Australian roots, but then again, they also had English members in the group. So, you'd have to split the difference. Frank Zappa (Captain Beefheart, etc.) was doing all kinds of stuff back then. But, some people prefer to call him jazz, too. Triumph had a number of proggy moments in the 70s, but there was sort of a tug of war going on there between Gil Moore (who was more straight up rock) and Rik Emmett, who excelled at many different styles: Classical (great stuff there), jazz (he won awards for jazz), and rock. The most proggy moment to my ears from the 1970s was The Blinding Light Show. But, what they gave to prog on the one hand in the 1970s, they took away on the other, with some real cheese-ball songs. So, once again, you'd have to split the difference. Steely Dan deserves consideration, and if you don't think so, you can tell Micky. He'd just loooove to have that conversation with you. I'm sure that there are others ... but my brain isn't firing on all cylinders today. When I think "prog rock + 1970s + USA", I immediately think of Kansas, Styx, and Jefferson Starship. When I think "prog rock + 1970s + Canada", I immediately think of Rush and Triumph ... with Saga building up steam! |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Two more bands who charted: |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Fireballet is certainly a band I have heard of (I even have a t shirt by them that I got for free) but I don't think they had any chart success in the US.
I was just about to mention Supertramp and add them to the list until I realized they are from the UK. Doh! The Dixie Dregs are worth mentioning but they are more jazz rock/fusion plus not sure they charted anyway. I thought of the band Zebra but although they had one song I personally consider to be a prog classic("who's behind the door")over all they were more hard rock and I don't even think they are on this site as prog related. Nonetheless they somehow managed to headline one year at Rosfest and they were great. So they are imo at least worth mentioning(since they did chart) even though they don't quite hit the mark in the prog department. I did find another one that does fit the bill though and that is the band Art in America. They are on here as symphonic prog although maybe crossover might be more accurate imo. Their debut made it to number 176. Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - July 08 2020 at 17:26 |
||
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 16 2019 Location: Nottingham, U.K Status: Online Points: 39916 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
There was only one Dutch prog band who were the Focus of attention in England in the 1970's, although I've since discovered many other great Dutch bands since I first visited ProgArchives back in 2010.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |