Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Dream Theater
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDream Theater

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1516171819 42>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
zumacraig View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2013 at 20:45
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I like BC&SL and pretty much all the DT covers.....but yes except ADTOE. Although the inner gatefold on vinyl is pretty cool......matter of fact, all their vinyl cover art is much better than the jewel case versions....IMO
 
 
Especially this one.......Fantastic!!!
 
 
Again, IMHO.......

TRUE!  Those look great!  Are the dynamics better on the vinyl?
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
Back to Top
Cthulhu42 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2012
Location: R'lyeh
Status: Offline
Points: 249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2013 at 11:06
As far as DT covers go, I really like Scenes From a Memory, Train of Thought, and Octavarium, but most of the rest of them aren't very good.
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 21:30
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:


Originally posted by CKnoxW CKnoxW wrote:


Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

The Octavarium cover is just cool because it has a Newton's Cradle on it.  A Newton's Cradle can turn the most lame and pedestrian album cover (...or desk...or science class) into a wondrous and majestic extravaganza of nifty physics.

I always liked the Octavarium artwork as a whole, It seemed very Hugh Syme-y all around. The Greatest Hit artwork was the same way for me. It's when BC&SL hit that I thought, "Hey, wait a minute..." His work on Snakes and Arrows was great too. S&A live? Not so much.
Speaking of BC&SL, the image of the fish in the glass and the elephant painting was quite cool. The rest was kind of meh to me.


I just saw a video of an actual elephant painting a few months ago, and not just some random lines, but it was painting a perfectly identifiable... well, elephant. I don't know if the video could somehow have been faked, but it seemed pretty real to me. Yet, at the same time, it seems too incredible to be true.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 15:53
I like BC&SL and pretty much all the DT covers.....but yes except ADTOE. Although the inner gatefold on vinyl is pretty cool......matter of fact, all their vinyl cover art is much better than the jewel case versions....IMO
 
 
Especially this one.......Fantastic!!!
 
 
Again, IMHO.......
Back to Top
zumacraig View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 12:08
The artwork for Rush's Caravan single is excellent. Much better than CA. That being said I much prefer paintings rather than computer generated stuff.
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 11:07
Originally posted by CKnoxW CKnoxW wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

The Octavarium cover is just cool because it has a Newton's Cradle on it.  A Newton's Cradle can turn the most lame and pedestrian album cover (...or desk...or science class) into a wondrous and majestic extravaganza of nifty physics.

I always liked the Octavarium artwork as a whole, It seemed very Hugh Syme-y all around. The Greatest Hit artwork was the same way for me. It's when BC&SL hit that I thought, "Hey, wait a minute..." His work on Snakes and Arrows was great too. S&A live? Not so much.


Speaking of BC&SL, the image of the fish in the glass and the elephant painting was quite cool. The rest was kind of meh to me.
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
CKnoxW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 20 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 10:27
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

The Octavarium cover is just cool because it has a Newton's Cradle on it.  A Newton's Cradle can turn the most lame and pedestrian album cover (...or desk...or science class) into a wondrous and majestic extravaganza of nifty physics.

I always liked the Octavarium artwork as a whole, It seemed very Hugh Syme-y all around. The Greatest Hit artwork was the same way for me. It's when BC&SL hit that I thought, "Hey, wait a minute..." His work on Snakes and Arrows was great too. S&A live? Not so much.
Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 10:16
The Octavarium cover is just cool because it has a Newton's Cradle on it.  A Newton's Cradle can turn the most lame and pedestrian album cover (...or desk...or science class) into a wondrous and majestic extravaganza of nifty physics.
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
Earendil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 17 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1584
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 08:16
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:


Yeah, I would agree, I like the SC cover actually.  But ADTOE had a very lame design in my opinion, with the overly bright cover and the clip art unicyclist...bleh.  Not a bad idea really, but was executed poorly.

I'd argue bad idea and poorly executed Smile

Originally posted by CKnoxW CKnoxW wrote:

But BC&SL... That looks like a digital design student's final project, not the work of an established graphic artist

This about sums it up


Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

 Octavarium was quite cool 

I do like the Octavarium cover, but I think the rest from the 2000's range from decent to bad.


Edited by Earendil - July 25 2013 at 08:19
Back to Top
zeqexes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 19 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 03:42
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

Originally posted by Earendil Earendil wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.

I love the Moving Pictures cover, especially the back.  Nothing says "Prog" like a triple entendre picture LOL




Yes, that one was brilliant; I personally think that the abstract bleakness of Grace Under Pressure was his high point in Rush's discography; Counterparts, A Farewell to Kings, Roll the Bones, and Vapor Trails were also excellent.

I disagree a lot with these statements. Octavarium was quite cool, but I think that SC was great, I think the art was way better than the music. I mean, the whole concept of the ants was kind of cool. And the most recent work in ADToE has really cool stuff, like the old warrior in the desert and the cycleboy in the cliff and in the dock.

Maybe it's not quite for "proggies", but the art itself added something to the concept.

But of coruse, every inch of their work is quite analyzed but that's the essence of DT fans / haters.


Yeah, I would agree, I like the SC cover actually.  But ADTOE had a very lame design in my opinion, with the overly bright cover and the clip art unicyclist...bleh.  Not a bad idea really, but was executed poorly.

Agreed.
Back to Top
CKnoxW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 20 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 25 2013 at 00:12
But BC&SL... That looks like a digital design student's final project, not the work of an established graphic artist
Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2013 at 19:32
Originally posted by jampa17 jampa17 wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

Originally posted by Earendil Earendil wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.

I love the Moving Pictures cover, especially the back.  Nothing says "Prog" like a triple entendre picture LOL




Yes, that one was brilliant; I personally think that the abstract bleakness of Grace Under Pressure was his high point in Rush's discography; Counterparts, A Farewell to Kings, Roll the Bones, and Vapor Trails were also excellent.

I disagree a lot with these statements. Octavarium was quite cool, but I think that SC was great, I think the art was way better than the music. I mean, the whole concept of the ants was kind of cool. And the most recent work in ADToE has really cool stuff, like the old warrior in the desert and the cycleboy in the cliff and in the dock.

Maybe it's not quite for "proggies", but the art itself added something to the concept.

But of coruse, every inch of their work is quite analyzed but that's the essence of DT fans / haters.


Yeah, I would agree, I like the SC cover actually.  But ADTOE had a very lame design in my opinion, with the overly bright cover and the clip art unicyclist...bleh.  Not a bad idea really, but was executed poorly.
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
jampa17 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2009
Location: Guatemala
Status: Offline
Points: 6802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2013 at 19:14
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

Originally posted by Earendil Earendil wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.

I love the Moving Pictures cover, especially the back.  Nothing says "Prog" like a triple entendre picture LOL




Yes, that one was brilliant; I personally think that the abstract bleakness of Grace Under Pressure was his high point in Rush's discography; Counterparts, A Farewell to Kings, Roll the Bones, and Vapor Trails were also excellent.

I disagree a lot with these statements. Octavarium was quite cool, but I think that SC was great, I think the art was way better than the music. I mean, the whole concept of the ants was kind of cool. And the most recent work in ADToE has really cool stuff, like the old warrior in the desert and the cycleboy in the cliff and in the dock.

Maybe it's not quite for "proggies", but the art itself added something to the concept.

But of coruse, every inch of their work is quite analyzed but that's the essence of DT fans / haters.
Change the program inside... Stay in silence is a crime.
Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2013 at 22:41
Originally posted by Earendil Earendil wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.

I love the Moving Pictures cover, especially the back.  Nothing says "Prog" like a triple entendre picture LOL




Yes, that one was brilliant; I personally think that the abstract bleakness of Grace Under Pressure was his high point in Rush's discography; Counterparts, A Farewell to Kings, Roll the Bones, and Vapor Trails were also excellent.
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
CKnoxW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 20 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2013 at 22:32
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.


Most of the art in CA is pretty "eh" as well. I wonder what his deal is! It's kind of like since he's become purely Photoshop based his quality has steadily declined.
Back to Top
Earendil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 17 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1584
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2013 at 22:27
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.

I love the Moving Pictures cover, especially the back.  Nothing says "Prog" like a triple entendre picture LOL


Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2013 at 21:57
^Yeah, his DT covers have been quite a letdown, especially considering the good work he's done with Rush over the years.  Though I'm not too crazy about the CA cover.
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
CKnoxW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 20 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2013 at 20:21
Originally posted by Earendil Earendil wrote:

Yeah considering their prestige, you'd think they'd have a good artist do their stuff.  It seems like they don't give a sh*t what gets put on there on a lot of their albums

The funniest part is that Hugh Syme has done all of their art since Octavarium. I love Hugh Syme, but apart from Octavarium, the other covers have been a little... not so good haha
Back to Top
CKnoxW View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 20 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 22 2013 at 20:17
Dream Theater is getting far too heavy for my tastes recently and ever since Systematic Chaos, the albums have have had really fantastic material and really boring material.They've been embraced by the metal community and I feel like they've been catering more towards them recently instead of their prog fans. They're leaning more toward the technical side of things than the actual musical lately. Hell, I'd go as far as just calling them technical rock/metal now instead of progressive.

The above statement in no way means I'm not super excited for the new album release. On the contrary, I'm anxious to hear what it's going to be like with Mangini as a full fledged member.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2013 at 23:18
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Guys, this is the logo
               

This is the Majesty symbol

 
From a marketing perspective both are logos....The bottom one is a symbol, the top one is a title mark, word mark or word graphic...for example:
NIKE is the company name and a wordmark graphic. The "swoosh" is the company logo, usually both used together.
 
With regard to Dream Theater, the symbol is related to the "company" Dream Theater....both refer to the same thing, from a marketing perspective, I am sure its what they prefer.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1516171819 42>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.182 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.