Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What happened to TOP 100???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat happened to TOP 100???

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 12131415>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Evandro Martini View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 08 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 18:13
Well, I'm one of those who care for the top 100, and I didn't like the new algo. Ok, Bacamarte and Harmonium on the top 20 is great, but I perferred the other list, where the grading were important but the amount of reviews too.
"You’ll never make any money playing music that people can’t sing.” Keith Emerson's father
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 18:11
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

good thing theres still like all of my favorite albums NOT in the top 100


top 100 could be reversed to bottom 100 for me and I really would have few complaints, heh
 
Damn Joey you must like some terrible music then if it's not even on the top 100.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 18:11
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

I like it....  nice seeing Per Un Amico up with albums it should be up with.  give you $20 though if you add some code to drop the same damn Genesis albums off the top of the list though hahhah


Heretic!!! Blasphemer!!!









                            
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 18:06
good thing theres still like all of my favorite albums NOT in the top 100


top 100 could be reversed to bottom 100 for me and I really would have few complaints, heh
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 18:06
Originally posted by russellk russellk wrote:

Benn thinking about this change this morning.

Many of us experienced prog-heads profess our disinterest in the Top 100 (doesn't stop us posting though). So who is the Top 100 for?

In my opinion it serves the newer prog-lover, someone looking to build up their infant collection.

That's why a weighting for popularity was very important in the old system. A newcomer to prog needs, surely, to listen to the most widely acclaimed progressive music before branching out. Yes, they should branch out, which is why the site has 'Top' lists in all the different and challenging prog genres. But listening to the top 100 should be the first aim.

That 'popularity' weighting has largely gone.

So what will happen now? Some of the more obscure albums lauded by a few are now in the Top 100. Newcomers to prog will purchase them. They may find the music too much for their uneducated ears, and put aside prog altogether, or at the least the genre from which the album they purchased comes from.

My point? The change is great for me: it highlights some new music to get hold of (I've not heard BACAMARTE, for example). But the Top 100 is not for me, a prog lover since the early '70s. It's for the newcomer, who will, I think, be somewhat disconcerted by some of the music they may inadvertently end up with.
 
When I was getting introduced to prog and I found this site the first albums I bought were those from bands I had never heard of before. I cut my teeth on Pavlov's Dog, Gnidrolog, The Residents, Sleepytime Gorilla Museum, PFM, and VDGG.
 
If someone is looking to explore prog they're doing so because they want something different, something they've never heard before. There's no danger of scarring off someone with this sort of exploratory mindset. On the contrary the danger is boring him so he thinks prog doesn't have the answer I'm looking for; at which point he goes looking for free jazz or whatnot to satisfy him.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
russellk View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 782
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:59
Been thinking about this change this morning.

Many of us experienced prog-heads profess our disinterest in the Top 100 (doesn't stop us posting though). So who is the Top 100 for?

In my opinion it serves the newer prog-lover, someone looking to build up their infant collection.

That's why a weighting for popularity was very important in the old system. A newcomer to prog needs, surely, to listen to the most widely acclaimed progressive music before branching out. Yes, they should branch out, which is why the site has 'Top' lists in all the different and challenging prog genres. But listening to the top 100 should be the first aim.

That 'popularity' weighting has largely gone.

So what will happen now? Some of the more obscure albums lauded by a few are now in the Top 100. Newcomers to prog will purchase them. They may find the music too much for their uneducated ears, and put prog aside altogether, or at the least discard the genre from which comes the album they purchased.

My point? The change is great for me: it highlights some new music to get hold of (I've not heard BACAMARTE, for example). But the Top 100 is not for me, a prog lover since the early '70s. It's for the newcomer, who will, I think, be somewhat disconcerted by some of the music they may inadvertently end up with.

Edited by russellk - July 10 2007 at 18:03
Back to Top
Dim View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:59
WYWH Does not belong in the top ten, I know some people can't seem to fing the difference between a good album and a good prog album. I totally agree we should do something about this apostrophy.Wink
Back to Top
Dirk View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:55
Floyd on first position, PFM in top 10 and Bacamarte on14th position,Grobschnitt's Solar music live back in top 100, i'm definitely not complaining Thumbs%20Up. And indeed if this thread wasn't here i wouldn't have noticed for a month.
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:51
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

Originally posted by Deathrabbit Deathrabbit wrote:

I think it would be cool if the algorithm factored in sales of the albums somehow. Not too much, mind you, but it should get a tad bit of a say. Just a little. Really tiny adjustment.
Well, considering that Dark Side Of The Moon is in the 30-40 million sales region and many/most albums here are sub 10 000, I fail to see the point.

It's just a trick to get Invisible Touch into the top 10 Wink


The hidden faction of deviants to destroy PA is exposed.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:48
Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

Originally posted by Deathrabbit Deathrabbit wrote:

I think it would be cool if the algorithm factored in sales of the albums somehow. Not too much, mind you, but it should get a tad bit of a say. Just a little. Really tiny adjustment.

Well, considering that Dark Side Of The Moon is in the 30-40 million sales region and many/most albums here are sub 10 000, I fail to see the point.
It's just a trick to get Invisible Touch into the top 10 Wink
What?
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:47
Originally posted by Deathrabbit Deathrabbit wrote:

I think it would be cool if the algorithm factored in sales of the albums somehow. Not too much, mind you, but it should get a tad bit of a say. Just a little. Really tiny adjustment.

Well, considering that Dark Side Of The Moon is in the 30-40 million sales region and many/most albums here are sub 10 000, I fail to see the point.
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Failcore View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 4625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:33
I think it would be cool if the algorithm factored in sales of the albums somehow. Not too much, mind you, but it should get a tad bit of a say. Just a little. Really tiny adjustment.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:23
Originally posted by chamberry chamberry wrote:

I was looking at one of my reviews giving the band a 3 star and the result is 3.53.  I also gave the same band a 4 star on another album and the results is 3.54.

I'm not that good at math so that's probably why I didn't understood the wikipedia definition. LOL
I guess the rating weights have changed. But with only 1 rating for each album the weighted average should be the same as the mean average which in turn should be equal to the rating you gave.
 
However, it does look like the Colaborator weighting has gone awry on your 4-star review.


Edited by darqdean - July 10 2007 at 17:28
What?
Back to Top
Yorkie X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1049
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:20
98. EMERSON LAKE & PALMER (ELP)
Brain Salad Surgery   Ermm  
Back to Top
SFranke View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 142
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:18
I'd like to know what the weights are. Before, a reviewer's review was worth 2, a review >200 words was worth 1.5, and short reviews and ratings were worth 1, I believe.
Back to Top
oracus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 497
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:08
Sorry for that, but i think the old one was more accurate.

ÄNGLAGÅRD's Hybris on 17th position?

98. EMERSON LAKE & PALMER (ELP)
Brain Salad Surgery

That seems really strange. I'm not the biggest ELP fan in the world, but 98 position is definitely unfair..

Edited by oracus - July 10 2007 at 17:12

Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 17:01
First time I bothered to look art it in a long time. Better than I remembered. Some more non-british albums, and PFM in top ten is great.

Robert Wyatt and Peter Hammill in too, and Brain Salad Surgery on its way out for good!

Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
darkshade View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: November 19 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 10964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 16:57
ITCOTCK will forever remain at #7 haha
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 16:57
Originally posted by Equality 7-2521 Equality 7-2521 wrote:

^ I come here to keep a count of how many anti-US government remarks I hear a daySmile


LOLClap
Clap
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2007 at 16:56
^ I come here to keep a count of how many anti-US government remarks I hear a daySmile
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 12131415>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.398 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.