But of course in real life we are experiencing things, giving us varying degrees of certainty of what is (most likely) true and what isn't. The theory of gravity is a good example - can be verified by everyone through simple experiments. General relativity is only slightly more difficult - but anyone who has a mobile phone with GPS is implicitly verifying it every day. No such experiments are possible with Orgone energy, for example, despite there being expensive gadgets available (with patents protecting the designs).

 Heck, some of these devices look really cool.

I'll eschew quoting the color-coded gibberish and keep the only aspect of your commentary that has not wholly devolved into some conspiracy syndrome-laced tin-foil-hattery. 

You could be a zealot in Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum, wherein the lead character, an author of conspiratorial occult fiction, awaits death at the hands of deluded fanatics who believe he is withholding arcane information from them (information that is wholly fictional and nonexistent), and he opines:

Fair enough. I just try to be precise about what is said in the video and what isn't.

(1) there is no level playing field in a Western democracy,

(2) some rich people and corporations hold far too much power and have the means to influence decisions made in a democracy in unacceptable ways,

(3) the power of democratically elected national governments is limited by national and international contracts and power structure,

(4) manipulation of voters and the general public opinion by dark and not quite so dark means happens regularly in democracies,

(5) we cannot trust that politicians honestly try to serve the public and to represent public interest as well as they can (although such politicians can be found),

(6) not all information in a democracy is open.

That said, I don't buy the "world government" story (the fact that there are some rules that hold  worldwide in principle isn't enough for this claim); I rather think that  there are many actors that have different and often opposing aims, and don't normally act in a coordinated manner. I also think (and know from experience, personal contact etc.) that democratically elected national and regional governments can and do decide many things that have a lot of impact on the people, mostly of course thing the global players with enough power don't care about, but also occasionally they take on global players. I think that you find many of the shortcomings of democracies also in general interactions between people (the current thread is a nice illustration ), so democracy is problematic but not the primary source of many of these problems, and abolishing democracy is not a way to solve these. I can however see how because of these issues many think that Western democracy is not really "true democracy", and this is in my view rather a matter of definition. i.e., how ideal you require a system to be in order to be called "democracy". Obviously you can have a concept that makes "true democracy" impossible and then you can't have it, alright. The problem with this is that if people don't want to defend what we have, we may well lose it, and what comes then may well be worse. Particularly because also this is used by players who want to replace democracy by something else that will not fix any of the issues listed above, and will actually be worse, maybe much worse.

To bring in another aspect, which unfortunately also doesn't show Western democracies in a very favourable light, Western democracies have been major players when it comes to climate change and ruining the environment more generally. By and large people will not vote to constrain their lifestyle, and so ruining the planet goes on, and pretty much everything that happens at international level is too little too late. Ah, something could be said in favour of a coordinated world government that would act on these issues, but alas, it looks like neither dictatorships not international coordination come up with anything better than elected national and regional governments. Sigh. But once more, also this issue alienates some people (particularly young ones) from democracy and will be used against it by those who want to get rid of it.

BTW @ siLLy puPPy: I do some research, too and have actually watched the J. Giordano video. I don't have an issue with that. It is basically a list of dangerous things that exist, nothing wrong with knowing this, however it has no implications regarding "world government" and conspiracy (and isn't meant to) nor is it questioning democracy (although I see the point that application of what is presented there is a problem for democracy, see my point (4)).