Russian chemical attack on UK

On the basis that we'll probably be sh*t in the World Cup and get knocked out early on, we should definitely boycott it.

siLLy puPPy wrote: ^ not defending Russia and all their crimes but the UK and US have done it all as well. I'm only talking about this incident. If there is no evidence and they are quick to blame, it's usually a false flag. That's the insider's protocol. I've heard plenty of whistleblower testimonies that explained these things in grueling detail. No matter whodunnit, it's obviously a sad event indeed. I've just learned all governments are equally corrupt especially my own.

There is some 'evidence' The substance in question was specifically Russian made. That has been ascertained with rigerous testing at our chem/biologcal warfare research faclility. The Russians had motive for the attack. If this wasn't state ordered then there is the question of how the material fell into what we call the "wrong hands" Either way, Moscow needs to answer questions.

The Russians are demanding to see the evidence that it was a Russian made substance, and so far, I think, the UK has refused to share that evidence with Moscow, which does ring some alarm bells of course.

False flags do happen I know. Since the 90's I've also done a fair amount of reading on the subject, but trustworthy sources are hard to find. I gave up reading up on 9/11 and the 7/7 attacks in London. There are so many anomolies and coincidences, my head was spinning. It got to the point that whenever anyone official spoke about what happened I just laughed a what I believed was their brazen bullsh*t. I thought I was going mad.

^ A history of poisoning spies, ex spies and anyone else Putin hates in a country that's not his. If the British got this wrong, it makes up for the hundreds of other unmentioned acts by the Russians. So be it.

Edited by SteveG - March 13 2018 at 07:44

Unlike the American President, the UK PM called Russia out. Bravo!

siLLy puPPy wrote: These are usually false flags that are masterminded to instill fear in the public in order to carry out some political means. A tired but effective method (think Bay of Pigs in Cuba in 1960s)

It's possible, but there is no proof, or indeed even evidence that it is a false flag. I'm aware there does seem to have been a concerted effort to provoke Russia into confrontation for the last 30 years or so, although I'm not sure what the motive would be.

Let's assume for now, that this was a Russian state authorised attack on UK soil, using a WMD. It may not be, of course, bt if it is, then it is tecnically an act of war, although clearly our "strong and stable" prime minister would only use such language against a weaker opponent.

What action do you think the UK government should take? Is this a matter for the NATO allaince (attack on one is an attack on all etc) Should we go crying to the UN, or stumble head first into armageddon?

OR...take our ball home and not play in ther world cup!!