Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 12:48 |
Will be checked out, thanks for reporting. Remember though that ratings without reviews have much reduced influence on the ratings calculations.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 12:48 |
The only way a person can successfully "manipulate" ratings (other than by creating multiple accounts or hacking into the system) is quite simply if no one else rates or reviews albums.
Those "rebel" ratings can be just as valid (I've given my share of 1, 2, and 3 star reviews to "masterpieces"), and they will only have a huge impact if an album has very few reviews. Otherwise, the system will eventually correct itself, and those one or two "off-the-wall" ratings won't matter so much.
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 12:33 |
^ Of course I agree that those ratings can hardly be taken seriously ... but where do you draw the line? I've seen many collabs give 1 star to albums that are firmly in the 4-5 stars range with broad support from normal members and collabs ... should we nuke those "hateboys" too?
|
|
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 16913
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 10:09 |
I agree that such blatant fanboy-ism should be nuked when it is this obvious. We should have a SC in charge of sniffing out such attempts to manipulate, and that person should have the power to take action swiftly and nuke the account (under the fast approval of Admin of course, until the person's judgement is trustworthy). Unfortunately I doubt this will happen.
|
|
Soul Dreamer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 997
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 09:52 |
^^^ Yes, but that's just a consequence of the used algorithm...It will go down when more serious (collaborators) reviews are posted. I didn't post this complaint because I want to see Gazpacho high, but just because I think it's crazy that only PF would be 5* and all the rest garbage... The person clearly wants to see the PF albums high in the charts....
|
To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
|
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 09:46 |
Incidentally, something has happen, so that Tick Tock is in the top 20 albums ALL-TIME with just 25 ratings.
|
|
|
Mr ProgFreak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 09:43 |
I'd say: All is fair in love, war and ratings.
|
|
Soul Dreamer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 997
|
Posted: April 17 2009 at 09:40 |
I was looking at the new Gazpacho album, and saw there is one rating with 1 star. I can't believe somebody can rate that album that low, so I checked the user to see what he rated more. This is what I found:
http://www.progarchives.com/Collaborators.asp?id=23553
All Pink Floyd albums rated at 5*, TD's Phaedra also 5*, and the rest (all Genesis, Yes, Rush, etc etc...) 1*
All ratings without review... Looks like a clear case of (attempt at) list manipulation....
|
To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.