Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Shadowyzard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 24 2020
Location: Davutlar
Status: Offline
Points: 4506
|
Posted: October 15 2021 at 07:27 |
^ Lol. Sheer stupidity. We, in Turkey, have such troglodytes too. They can equal, if not top, this person.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." Albert Einstein
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: October 15 2021 at 07:21 |
can anyone top this stupidity of Lauren Boebert? in reaction to a man killing 5 people with bow and arrow she tweeted this:
"A man in Norway just killed a bunch of people with a bow and arrow.
Norway has some of the strictest gun laws around, yet mass killings still occur.
Liberals need to understand it is not the gun - it is the criminal who commits the act!"
the last mass killing in Norway happened in 2011 when a man shot 77 people with a gun
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
|
Posted: October 15 2021 at 07:17 |
JD wrote:
Occasionally I'll come across an article that helps demonstrate some fundamental differences between the US and Canada. How do you think this would have played out more often than not south of the border? (NOTE: Pay attention to the numbers)
|
We're pretty churchy conservative around here, but popular metal bands and hard rock bands such as Metallica or AC/DC are pretty well accepted, no one seems too concerned about satanic implications. I think the big difference today is that a lot of parents today grew up listening to metal, which is far different from their parents who felt more threatened by it. If an educator around here posted such a thing, I think they would be advised to remove it, but I would be surprised if more than a few people felt offended enough to make a stink about it.
Edited by Easy Money - October 15 2021 at 07:21
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
|
Posted: October 15 2021 at 06:25 |
JD wrote:
Occasionally I'll come across an article that helps demonstrate some fundamental differences between the US and Canada. How do you think this would have played out more often than not south of the border? (NOTE: Pay attention to the numbers)
|
It depends on where exactly south of the border you're referring to. She would fit in well in Austin, Texas. Muskogee, Oklahoma? Not as much.
Edited by SteveG - October 15 2021 at 06:25
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
JD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 07 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18446
|
Posted: October 15 2021 at 05:46 |
Occasionally I'll come across an article that helps demonstrate some fundamental differences between the US and Canada. How do you think this would have played out more often than not south of the border? (NOTE: Pay attention to the numbers)
Edited by JD - October 15 2021 at 05:47
|
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
|
progaardvark
Collaborator
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams
Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 50966
|
Posted: October 14 2021 at 16:03 |
Atavachron wrote:
Trump just released a statement saying Republicans won't vote in 2022 or '24 if we don't "fix Presidential Election fraud".
Hm.
|
Gee, who could imagine Trump saving us from low information voters?
|
---------- i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
|
Posted: October 14 2021 at 04:09 |
Atavachron wrote:
Trump just released a statement saying Republicans won't vote in 2022 or '24 if we don't "fix Presidential Election fraud".
Hm.
|
Thank God. There's hope.
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 22:39 |
Trump just released a statement saying Republicans won't vote in 2022 or '24 if we don't "fix Presidential Election fraud".
Hm.
Edited by Atavachron - October 13 2021 at 22:40
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
ProfPanglos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 624
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 21:47 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
The intent was to stop the joint session of Congress from counting the electoral votes and certifying the presidential election, which these camo-wearing clowns did for several hours. That, in and of itself, is reprehensible, seditious and indefensible.
That these insurrectionists were stupid was evident. It was, after all, an attempted "stupid coup" fomented by a fraudulent charlatan spouting nonsense about a stolen election even after every court in the land threw out the idiotic attempts of Trump's assorted nut attorneys to prove otherwise. But these were particular asshats attacking and beating the police, waving their Confederate flags and sporting neo-Nazi regalia, and wandering the halls of the Capitol looking for congressmen to kidnap or kill. They were representative of Trump's base. They were Trump's voter demographic. To a tee. |
You know what, you're right about that - I totally forgot about the in-progress vote-count aspect. So yes, I can agree that what they did was "reprehensible, seditious and indefensible." Thank you for reminding me of that.
I'll reverse my position on this, and agree that this was an "insurrection."
And, I just read the Wikipedia page on the "2021 United States Capitol Attack" and it was apparently far uglier than I remembered when following the events during the time.
I will say that I don't agree with your last comment about these people being representative of Trump's base. I think they represent a fringe element, sure. I know plenty of Trump supporters, and none of them are Confederate flag-waving neo-Nazi types.
Thank you for changing my mind about this topic, though. Much appreciated.
Edited by ProfPanglos - October 13 2021 at 21:55
|
DIGNITAS - FIRMITAS - GRAVITAS - COMITAS - LIBERTAS
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13054
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 21:09 |
ProfPanglos wrote:
SteveG wrote:
There's a big difference between protesting a government and trying to overthrow one. If someone can't see the difference between the two, it can only be down to that person justifying the act of the latter, as no one can possibly be so stupid. |
I agree 100% with your first sentence.
Again, did any of these people have automatic rifles, rocket launchers, or bombs? If their intent was to "overthrow the government," how exactly were they going to do that? Use their MAGA caps to bludgeon anyone who stood in their way? I guess the guy with the viking helmet could've started impaling people with those horns...
I'm not justifying what they did. What they did was stupid. But if that was an "overthrow the government" attempt, they really need to 'up their game,' LOL. Which is why I stand by my position that it wasn't their intent to begin with. |
The intent was to stop the joint session of Congress from counting the electoral votes and certifying the presidential election, which these camo-wearing clowns did for several hours. That, in and of itself, is reprehensible, seditious and indefensible.
That these insurrectionists were stupid was evident. It was, after all, an attempted "stupid coup" fomented by a fraudulent charlatan spouting nonsense about a stolen election even after every court in the land threw out the idiotic attempts of Trump's assorted nut attorneys to prove otherwise. But these were particular asshats attacking and beating the police, waving their Confederate flags and sporting neo-Nazi regalia, and wandering the halls of the Capitol looking for congressmen to kidnap or kill. They were representative of Trump's base. They were Trump's voter demographic. To a tee.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
ProfPanglos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 624
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 20:29 |
SteveG wrote:
There's a big difference between protesting a government and trying to overthrow one. If someone can't see the difference between the two, it can only be down to that person justifying the act of the latter, as no one can possibly be so stupid. |
I agree 100% with your first sentence.
Again, did any of these people have automatic rifles, rocket launchers, or bombs? If their intent was to "overthrow the government," how exactly were they going to do that? Use their MAGA caps to bludgeon anyone who stood in their way? I guess the guy with the viking helmet could've started impaling people with those horns...
I'm not justifying what they did. What they did was stupid. But if that was an "overthrow the government" attempt, they really need to 'up their game,' LOL. Which is why I stand by my position that it wasn't their intent to begin with.
|
DIGNITAS - FIRMITAS - GRAVITAS - COMITAS - LIBERTAS
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 20:07 |
There's a big difference between protesting a government and trying to overthrow one. If someone can't see the difference between the two, it can only be down to that person justifying the act of the latter, as no one can possibly be so stupid.
Edited by SteveG - October 13 2021 at 20:08
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
ProfPanglos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 624
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 18:39 |
Well, enjoy the comfort of your opinion.
|
DIGNITAS - FIRMITAS - GRAVITAS - COMITAS - LIBERTAS
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 18:29 |
I don't demand anything-- you voted for Donald Trump, sir, a disturbed, racist hack who is on the wrong side of history.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
ProfPanglos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 624
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 18:25 |
Atavachron wrote:
I think what those who support Trump (both in government and in the public) don't grasp is how much Americans like their peace & quiet. The vast majority of US citizens of all political spectrums want to live in an orderly, law-abiding country. In the long run, the people that put that at risk will suffer the most politically. You claim that you and most Americans are "not governable" ... bullsh*t. The question is: do most Americans want a government ? Unfortunately for your position, the answer is 'Yes'.
There is no "Demand for conformity of thought" and that misunderstands the big picture. For instance, recently some Trump supporters have claimed Dems want to abolish private property ownership. Really? Oh I don't think so. Liberals own at least as much property as conservatives, and it demonstrates the hysteria around who wants freedom vs. who wants regulation.
You voted for someone who is encouraging violence upon fellow citizens.
You
Voted
For
A
Sociopath.
Own it, don't toss it off as being a "Libertarian", and take responsibility for it.
|
LMAO, in the same post you say there's no demand for conformity of thought, and then demand that I "own" your very biased perspective.
I'll call your bullsh*t and raise you 2.
See, it's your kind of "in your face" attack-post that makes political discussions boring for me. I already "owned" that I voted for Trump, with a several-point explanation for *why* I did so. If I was ashamed of it, I'd say so - but I'm not.
But yeah, I guess I shoulda voted for the new stable genius in office, whose "exit strategy" plan for Afghanistan included a viral video with Afghanis falling out of the sky from a USAF jet, the deaths of 12 US military members and over 100 Afghanis dead, and, oh yeah, that "righteous" drone strike that killed an aid worker and 9 members of his family. And all that in just 2 weeks!
You didn't vote for *that* sociopath, did you?
Edited by ProfPanglos - October 13 2021 at 18:25
|
DIGNITAS - FIRMITAS - GRAVITAS - COMITAS - LIBERTAS
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65248
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 17:22 |
ProfPanglos wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
Where are our conservative members who had been joining this conversation? No longer interested in discussing the treason of your leaders? Stopped wanting to chat about the criminals the Republican party continues to not only support but gleefully endorse? The appalling actions of what has revealed itself to be a movement of totalitarians who'd like to see Trump and his endorsees stay in office for life?
Is there anybody out there ... ? | I'm here, and happy to talk politics as long as it remains civil... sometimes political conversations devolve into insults and/or personal attacks, and I'd lose interest if that happened. Plus, I don't like labels. While I did vote for Trump in 2020, I didn't vote for him in 2016, and I:
a) Don't really consider Trump a "conservative." b) Don't consider myself a "conservative" or "Republican" either. My views about politics are probably closer related to Libertarian ideas, or probably more accurately, Anarchist to some degree. I dislike government in general, and think there should be a lot less of it. I think the US Constitution has served the country well, generally speaking, but I don't think the Constitution is the "end all, be all" and am not certain it is sufficient to serve the country as it currently exists. c) Think our government is rife with corruption on both sides of the aisle, and in the last couple of decades at least exists only to perpetuate a broken system for the sole purpose of amassing profit and power. d) Think that the American people (myself included) find it easy to blame government for the ills of society, when in fact the American people (myself included) are really not that... governable, and are also plenty responsible for perpetuating these various "ills."
Anyway, I'm up for discussion. I think your language about "treason" and "a movement of totalitarians" is a bit overblown, as is some of the language I've seen in the news about the so-called "insurrection." I don't see this as much different than what I've witnessed at leftist "protests" - as soon as a protest turns violent, and people get shot, or buildings are set on fire, or private property is looted, the leftist protesters say it was the doing of "bad actors" and not the real, peace-loving protesters. And yes, Democrat politicians have sometimes "encouraged" it and participated in it. It's never malicious or treasonous or reprehensible when leftists do it, but when probably the majority of the media outlets bend left (and hate Trump), and when Democrats (who also hate Trump) are in power, Trump is portrayed as the evil of evils and a wannabe Hitler.
There are plenty of things about Trump that I dislike - but I voted for him in 2020 because (as stated earlier) there were plenty of his policies and quirks that I approved of (and still do).
In my perfect and imaginary world, there would be a 2024 election boycott, and no one would vote for anyone. Can you imagine how scared the fops and corrupt politicians (Republican and Democrat) would then be? All their efforts to keep the greater society divided and at each other's throats would've failed, and they'd realize they no longer have the consent of the people to govern them, and maybe they'd get their collective sh*t together and make some decisions which actually helped people instead of decisions made to line their own pockets and keep themselves in power.
But I'm not holding my breath for that one.
Edited to add: Also, while I enjoy talking politics, it's certainly not why I come to this forum, and I'm not an "activist" about anything. I'm an "inactivist" LOL. The typical "hot button" issues that people like to argue about don't interest me much. Abortion, racism, immigration, etc. - blah blah blah (to quote that climate-change advocate kid Greta). Just doesn't interest me.
My biggest complaint about American socio-politics (and I suppose it isn't just an "American" issue, but an international one) is the demand for conformity of thought, and the various coercive, manipulative attempts by government, media, academia, and even just individual citizens to try to shape my thinking. The whole vaccine-mandate thing is a perfect example. I don't want the vaccine. That doesn't make me "anti-vax" (I've not just visited, but resided for multiple years in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe over the decades, and been vaccinated from here to eternity and never had any problem with it.) In my later years, I've developed a healthy skepticism for the medical and pharmaceutical industry. I never get flu shots. So now we have a new and more dangerous (but still relatively harmless) flu called covid-19. I'm not afraid of covid. Nor am I afraid of the vaccine, but I don't yet have any real level of trust in it (to not have as-yet-unknown adverse long-term side-effects), nor do I see it as a very effective vaccine overall. The fear-factor of this flu has been greatly overstated/promoted, and I see people wearing masks outside with no other human being around them for a radius of 200 feet. What are they so afraid of? Fresh air? That's not "science," nor is it even common sense. It's irrational fear, and it's the product of propaganda, not science.
| I think what those who support Trump (both in government and in the public) don't grasp is how much Americans like their peace & quiet. The vast majority of US citizens of all political spectrums want to live in an orderly, law-abiding country. In the long run, the people that put that at risk will suffer the most politically. You claim that you and most Americans are "not governable" ... bullsh*t. The question is: do most Americans want a government ? Unfortunately for your position, the answer is 'Yes'.
There is no "Demand for conformity of thought" and that misunderstands the big picture. For instance, recently some Trump supporters have claimed Dems want to abolish private property ownership. Really? Oh I don't think so. Liberals own at least as much property as conservatives, and it demonstrates the hysteria around who wants freedom vs. who wants regulation.
You voted for someone who is encouraging violence upon fellow citizens.
You
Voted
For
A
Sociopath.
Own it, don't toss it off as being a "Libertarian", and take responsibility for it.
Edited by Atavachron - October 13 2021 at 17:35
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 16:00 |
^ Well this is why I don't belong to a party nor welcome any easy labels or watch network news. BUT, given the options, I do think trump is the bigger danger to the country, I would gladly support a republican who will stand up to him, or person of any party.
|
|
ProfPanglos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 624
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 15:46 |
Often, the impression I get is that Democrats think Republicans are stupid. And Republicans think Democrats are stupid.
And the Republicans and Democrats in government think all of us are stupid.
I mean, how many times has Trump lied to us? How many times has Biden lied to us? Or McConnell? Or Pelosi?
It's not a contest... my point is, *we* just sit here and are somehow okay with being lied-to by all of them and argue amongst ourselves about which "leader" is less-compromised. And we keep voting them in, thereby giving them our consent to be governed by them.
It just illustrates the amount of compromise we allow in our own lives.
Edited by ProfPanglos - October 13 2021 at 15:53
|
DIGNITAS - FIRMITAS - GRAVITAS - COMITAS - LIBERTAS
|
|
ProfPanglos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 25 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 624
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 15:44 |
Easy Money wrote:
The number one problem with trump is that he does not see himself as part of an orderly democratic republic following the rules established by our founding fathers, rather he sees himself as an autocrat, the CEO of the country who is the lone person in charge. His speech at the 2016 repub convention made this very clear.
What policies do the repubs stand for now, no one knows, they just follow the orders of their Caligula styled autocratic demagogue. Did the repubs even have a platform in 2020? |
I agree. But for the record, it goes both ways. What is it exactly that the Democrats stand for? Limited government? Ahahahahaha!
Just my opinion, and probably an oversimplification, but the real #1 problem with Trump is the blindness of his supporters, and the manufactured hate they have for Biden - and the real #1 problem with Biden is... the blindness of his supporters, and the manufactured hate they have for Trump.
Again, as stated earlier, I don't think the country is really very governable. It's a problem with *us* - not just the knuckleheads running the show. But if they can keep us all at each other's throats, their throats (and fame, and fortune) are safe.
|
DIGNITAS - FIRMITAS - GRAVITAS - COMITAS - LIBERTAS
|
|
Easy Money
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
|
Posted: October 13 2021 at 15:28 |
The number one problem with trump is that he does not see himself as part of an orderly democratic republic following the rules established by our founding fathers, rather he sees himself as an autocrat, the CEO of the country who is the lone person in charge. His speech at the 2016 repub convention made this very clear.
What policies do the repubs stand for now, no one knows, they just follow the orders of their Caligula styled autocratic demagogue. Did the repubs even have a platform in 2020?
|
|