![]() |
Are RUSH actually Prog? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 910111213 27> |
Author | ||
jude111 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: October 20 2009 Location: Not Here Status: Offline Points: 1754 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The notion of genre wasn't invented in the 1980s, Aristotle was writing about it over two thousand years ago in his Poetics, the earliest surviving work of dramatic theory and first to focus on literary theory. I used to listen to my parents argue who was better, Elvis or the Beatles - American rockabilly versus doowop; the merits of Merseybeat and the British Invasion; they'd talk about different 50s dance styles that were associated with different genres and regional scenes (the bop, the jitterbug, the twist, etc). The first British Invasion gave way to psychedelic music, electric folk rock, surf rock in the US, etc etc. From its inception rock was changing rapidly and going off in many different directions, birthing many different new genres and dance styles.
Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 22:52 |
||
![]() |
||
jude111 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: October 20 2009 Location: Not Here Status: Offline Points: 1754 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I grew up listening to Rush on my radio stations in the US in the late 70s and early 80s. These radio stations called themselves "AOR" (album oriented rock), and then in the 80s, "classic rock." The music these radio stations played side-by-side with Rush were tunes by Pink Floyd, Yes, Supertramp, Jethro Tull, Kansas, Led Zeppelin, Styx, Queen, Jimi Hendrix, early Sabbath, the Doors, Jefferson Airplane, Neil Young, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan. Rush's genre was 'album-oriented rock.' That was the industry term; that's how they were marketed, to radio stations that played music by 'album-oriented rock bands like Pink Floyd, Yes, and Led Zeppelin. Rush's big breakthrough was when the Cleveland radio station WMMS played "Working Man" on their station, and championed the band on air. WMMS also played David Bowie and Bruce Springsteen, helping them attain wider attention in the US. WMMS played Rush tunes side-by-side to tunes by King Crimson, Soft Machine, MC5, the Velvet Underground, and glam band the New York Dolls (whom Rush performed with). From Wikipedia: "WMMS during this period would play a key role in breaking several major acts in the U.S., including: Rush, Roxy Music, Bruce Springsteen, Southside Johnny, Fleetwood Mac, Meat Loaf, The Pretenders, the New York Dolls, Lou Reed, Mott the Hoople, Boston, and The Sensational Alex Harvey Band. Of special note was the early support of Bruce Springsteen by Kid Leo and others, prior to the release of the Born to Run album. For the station's tenth anniversary in 1978, WMMS hosted and broadcast a live Springsteen concert at the Agora Ballroom independent of his concert tour." Here's an interview with singer/bassist Geddy Lee in 1979 during their Hemispheres tour, a year before Permanent Waves came out. The interviewer asks Geddy who he listens to, who he's influenced by. Geddy Lee answers, "Right now, I'm really in love with Bill Bruford; he used to be with Yes and Genesis." (Bruford was the drummer of Yes, then joined King Crimson, then joined Genesis briefly on tour; then released a fusion album with guitarist Alan Holdsworth (who played in Gong and Soft Machine), which was Geddy's favorite music at this time. [It's at the 8 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDZUqwlu-7Q] I remember Rush was on the cover of Circus Magazine a few times in the late 70s and 80s. Other Circus covers included Hall & Oates, Rolling Stones, Jethro Tull, Elton John, Jimi Page, Yoko & John Lennon, Queen, Carly Simon, David Bowie, Kiss, etc. Rush a "hard rock band"? No. They were certainly marketed to people who enjoyed 'hard rock." But they were mainly marketed to people who listened to AOR rock (much of it what we call prog today). And Rush themselves were influenced by fellow prog acts, particularly Genesis, Yes, and King Crimson.
Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 14:39 |
||
![]() |
||
The Dark Elf ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13227 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
^ As I've stated before numerous times, there was no "prog" in the 70s. It was not a word used at the time. Never heard the term, and I was in bands. You listened to Yes, Floyd, Sabbath, Zeppelin, Tull, The Who, Bowie, Crimson, The Allman Brothers, Traffic, Santana, Deep Purple, The Beatles, The Stones, etc. interchangeably. There was no weird-ass delineation into little genre bins.
It was not until probably the late 70s, or more likely the 80s when such parceling and partitions of music became important. You had punk which sneered at dinosaur rock and corporate rock and arena rock. You had new wave (which punks also sneered at because the new wavers could actually sell albums after the initial punk period petered out). You had new age. You had new country (and country/western all but disappeared). And you had prog. Everything had to be neatly compartmentalized so that record execs and radio stations could properly disseminate their garbage (of course, this is when the term "classic rock" came in vogue for albums you bought new only 5 years or so previously).
|
||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||
![]() |
||
SteveG ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20617 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Edited by SteveG - May 09 2021 at 12:31 |
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
![]() |
||
Spaciousmind ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 07 2020 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 724 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You are in prime form today!
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
progaardvark ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams Joined: June 14 2007 Location: Sea of Peas Status: Offline Points: 52595 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It's like taking a head of cabbage, separating all the leaves, laying them neatly on a table until it is completely covered, and then blowing them off with a high-powered fan.
|
||
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag that's a happy bag of lettuce this car smells like cartilage nothing beats a good video about fractions |
||
![]() |
||
nick_h_nz ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You do realise that the two are not mutually exclusive, right? It is possible to be hard rock AND prog, just as it is possible to be folk AND prog, or metal AND prog, etc. etc. etc. The thing is with language is that it changes and evolves, and labels and definitions do also. And over time, this always causes arguments. Real life doesn’t live forever in neat little boxes. We can delve deep int semiotics and talk about signifier and signified as much as you like, but it doesn’t change what is, only how we describe it. The most frustrating thing I find with genres and labels, when it comes to music, is that it is often those who have come to the music later, who try to impose their understanding of the definition on an earlier time. That’s not to say that either understanding is right or wrong, so much as appropriate or inappropriate for a particular history. Anyone attempting to match the modern understanding of prog which the original scope of what was called progressive, will find a certain amount of disconnect, even though the two are similar concepts and have overlapping “definitions”. |
||
![]() |
||
Spaciousmind ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 07 2020 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 724 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Good I am glad we agree! It's the papers back that that confused things often. If something did not fit into a pop chart they listed it as progressive. But it probably did good for sales either way. I actually bought Commander Cody because it was listed to find out after I listened to it that it was Southern Rock a band from Texas i believe. Not really progressive at all but I still kinda liked the album back then for getting a taste of what people in Texas liked to hear. I guess from someone in the UK that might have been seen progressive by the paper that listed the chart as it was unlikely that something similar was sold at that time.
|
||
![]() |
||
suitkees ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 19 2020 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 9050 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thank you! After 15 pages I got a bit worried. Now I will be able to sleep tight again... ![]() |
||
The razamataz is a pain in the bum |
||
![]() |
||
nick_h_nz ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
None of that is what I said! 😄 I am not trying to put anything into boxes at all. All I said was that what the progressive box meant then is not what the progressive box means now, because latter generations are making the pretty little pink bows. If anything, everything you’ve said matches what I believe and think. So, you’re not actually disagreeing with anything I’ve said. 🤷🏻♂️ (Although, I guess it could be another Nick you are replying to?) |
||
![]() |
||
Spaciousmind ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 07 2020 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 724 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Wrong Nick, we did not go around as kids and say "we dunno what we are". We went to progressive rock concerts and if someone asked what we liked we said "I like progressive rock". It's the latter generations that are trying to place bands into buckets and tie pretty little pink bows around the term.
We knew what we were and what music we listened to and what concerts we went to. it's kind of insulting to be redefined by people 50 years later.
Edited by Spaciousmind - May 09 2021 at 08:43 |
||
![]() |
||
nick_h_nz ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team Joined: March 01 2013 Location: Suffolk, UK Status: Offline Points: 6737 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Sorry, but you’re wrong. As per my earlier reply within this thread, “Progressive“ didn’t have the meaning then that we have instilled in it now, as is evidenced by the cuttings in the booklets for the Krimson 30th anniversary series, where several “progressive charts” are included. For example this one, dated 18 Dec 1971, listing “the week’s best-selling 15 progressive albums”. The artists? 1. Led Zeppelin 2. ELP 3. King Crimson 4. Yes 5. John Lennon 6. Rod Stewart 7. Isaac Hayes 8. Pink Floyd (someone refuting your suggestion that they weren’t considered prog) 9. Wings 10. The Who 11. Cat Steven’s 12. Commander Cody and his Lost Planet Airmen (who? Sounds prog, though! 😜) 13. Santana 14. “New Riders of the Purple Sage” - Various Artists 15= The Doors 15= Traffic Now there’s plenty there that is in PA as either prog or prog-related, but clearly progressive in the ‘70s meant something different than we think of it now. |
||
![]() |
||
uduwudu ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: July 17 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2601 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Rush prog rock? Yes. Glad that's cleared up. Hidden bonus. Pink Floyd prog? Yes. |
||
![]() |
||
Guldbamsen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Humility is such an old fashioned thing...sadly. I miss folks like that...gifted musicians with both feet planted in the ground.
|
||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
||
![]() |
||
DaleHauskins ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 23 2005 Location: So.California Status: Offline Points: 239 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I love the quote from Neil Peart who when asked what was it like to be the greatest drummer replied..."I don't know, you better ask Jon Hiseman!" “Jon was the biggest influence on my own personal drum development making me look beyond rock to jazz playing”
https://chriswelchonline.com/a-tribute-to-jon-hiseman/ |
||
Dale Hauskins
(858) 401-2973 (310) 293-0432 https://artistecard.com/Dalehauskins |
||
![]() |
||
Frenetic Zetetic ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 09 2017 Location: Now Status: Offline Points: 9233 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
...Then it shouldn't surprise you that some (certainly not me) indeed don't consider any of what you listed as prog, lol.
|
||
"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021 |
||
![]() |
||
The Dark Elf ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13227 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You are incorrect. The word "jazz" was not associated with the musical form until about 1915 in Chicago (where previously "jazz" was referred to as "blues"). The word migrated south to New Orleans and was first in print in 1916. Previously the musical form was known as "ragtime" in the Big Easy. So, in that sense "prog" was know as "rock" in the 1970s, and the word prog was used later to delineate a specific genre. And even "blues" music wasn't blue at the point of origin, and the term did not come into vogue until the turn of the 20th century; however the word itself has described melancholy for centuries. In the 14th century Chaucer wrote: Lo, yond the sunne, the candel of jelosye! Wyth teres blewe and with a wounded herte Taketh your leve. (Behold the sun yonder, the candle of jealousy! With blue tears and with wounded heart, take your leave.) Naming conventions for musical genres did not always spring fully formed at their inception. It's a silly idea, actually. No one called classical music "classical" back when Bach or Vivaldi were composing, or even Mozart, for that matter. The term didn't appear in the Oxford English Dictionary until 1829, and was used primarily as a means to categorize the period between Bach and Beethoven as a golden age of music.
|
||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
||
![]() |
||
Un Amico ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 01 2021 Location: Tauranga, NZ Status: Offline Points: 114 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I mean it's not what they called themselves at the time, whereas jazz musicians were always jazz, Blues was always Blues, Reggae was Reggae since it began, Folk was Folk etc. What we now call Prog did not exist as a definition in the early Seventies. The Seventies were the only decade that really mattered by the way. Prog musicians of today are mere replicants.
|
||
![]() |
||
Catcher10 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17966 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Not sure what you mean here, what would you like it to be called? It is 'Progressive' because its progressive, its a noun not an adjective like the word 'prog'. That's like saying 'Jazz' should not be called jazz....
|
||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Un Amico ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 01 2021 Location: Tauranga, NZ Status: Offline Points: 114 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
AND he had James Dewar...
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 910111213 27> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |