Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Are RUSH actually Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Are RUSH actually Prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 27>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
jude111 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jude111 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 17:52
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

^ As I've stated before numerous times, there was no "prog" in the 70s... There was no weird-ass delineation into little genre bins. 

It was not until probably the late 70s, or more likely the 80s when such parceling and partitions of music became important.

The notion of genre wasn't invented in the 1980s, Aristotle was writing about it over two thousand years ago in his Poetics, the earliest surviving work of dramatic theory and first to focus on literary theory.

I used to listen to my parents argue who was better, Elvis or the Beatles - American rockabilly versus doowop; the merits of Merseybeat and the British Invasion; they'd talk about different 50s dance styles that were associated with different genres and regional scenes (the bop, the jitterbug, the twist, etc). The first British Invasion gave way to psychedelic music, electric folk rock, surf rock in the US, etc etc. From its inception rock was changing rapidly and going off in many different directions, birthing many different new genres and dance styles.


Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 22:52
Back to Top
jude111 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 20 2009
Location: Not Here
Status: Offline
Points: 1754
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jude111 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 14:14
Originally posted by Deidre Deidre wrote:

No, Rush weren't considered as a progressive rock band at all at the time. Just hard-rock. It was a world without the Internet and multiplied tags.

I grew up listening to Rush on my radio stations in the US in the late 70s and early 80s. These radio stations called themselves "AOR" (album oriented rock), and then in the 80s, "classic rock." The music these radio stations played side-by-side with Rush were tunes by Pink Floyd, Yes, Supertramp, Jethro Tull, Kansas, Led Zeppelin, Styx, Queen, Jimi Hendrix, early Sabbath, the Doors, Jefferson Airplane, Neil Young, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan.

Rush's genre was 'album-oriented rock.' That was the industry term; that's how they were marketed, to radio stations that played music by 'album-oriented rock bands like Pink Floyd, Yes, and Led Zeppelin. Rush's big breakthrough was when the Cleveland radio station WMMS played "Working Man" on their station, and championed the band on air. WMMS also played David Bowie and Bruce Springsteen, helping them attain wider attention in the US. WMMS played Rush tunes side-by-side to tunes by King Crimson, Soft Machine, MC5, the Velvet Underground, and glam band the New York Dolls (whom Rush performed with). From Wikipedia: "WMMS during this period would play a key role in breaking several major acts in the U.S., including: RushRoxy MusicBruce SpringsteenSouthside JohnnyFleetwood MacMeat LoafThe Pretenders, the New York DollsLou ReedMott the HoopleBoston, and The Sensational Alex Harvey Band. Of special note was the early support of Bruce Springsteen by Kid Leo and others, prior to the release of the Born to Run album. For the station's tenth anniversary in 1978, WMMS hosted and broadcast a live Springsteen concert at the Agora Ballroom independent of his concert tour."

Here's an interview with singer/bassist Geddy Lee in 1979 during their Hemispheres tour, a year before Permanent Waves came out. The interviewer asks Geddy who he listens to, who he's influenced by. Geddy Lee answers, "Right now, I'm really in love with Bill Bruford; he used to be with Yes and Genesis." (Bruford was the drummer of Yes, then joined King Crimson, then joined Genesis briefly on tour; then released a fusion album with guitarist Alan Holdsworth (who played in Gong and Soft Machine), which was Geddy's favorite music at this time. [It's at the 8 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDZUqwlu-7Q]

I remember Rush was on the cover of Circus Magazine a few times in the late 70s and 80s. Other Circus covers included Hall & Oates, Rolling Stones, Jethro Tull, Elton John, Jimi Page, Yoko & John Lennon, Queen, Carly Simon, David Bowie, Kiss, etc.

Rush a "hard rock band"? No. They were certainly marketed to people who enjoyed 'hard rock." But they were mainly marketed to people who listened to AOR rock (much of it what we call prog today). And Rush themselves were influenced by fellow prog acts, particularly Genesis, Yes, and King Crimson.


Edited by jude111 - May 09 2021 at 14:39
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13227
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 13:19
^ As I've stated before numerous times, there was no "prog" in the 70s. It was not a word used at the time. Never heard the term, and I was in bands. You listened to Yes, Floyd, Sabbath, Zeppelin, Tull, The Who, Bowie, Crimson, The Allman Brothers, Traffic, Santana, Deep Purple, The Beatles, The Stones, etc. interchangeably. There was no weird-ass delineation into little genre bins. 

It was not until probably the late 70s, or more likely the 80s when such parceling and partitions of music became important. You had punk which sneered at dinosaur rock and corporate rock and arena rock. You had new wave (which punks also sneered at because the new wavers could actually sell albums after the initial punk period petered out). You had new age. You had new country (and country/western all but disappeared). And you had prog. 

Everything had to be neatly compartmentalized so that record execs and radio stations could properly disseminate their garbage (of course, this is when the term "classic rock" came in vogue for albums you bought new only 5 years or so previously). 
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 12:27
Originally posted by Deidre Deidre wrote:

Originally posted by Un Amico Un Amico wrote:

I mean it's not what they called themselves at the time, whereas jazz musicians were always jazz, Blues was always Blues, Reggae was Reggae since it began, Folk was Folk etc. What we now call Prog did not exist as a definition in the early Seventies. The Seventies were the only decade that really mattered by the way. Prog musicians of today are mere replicants.

I'm afraid that what we call Prog(ressive rock) did exist as early as 1970. For instance, here's a local newspaper announcing of the first closure of the Friars club in South East England, where it's described as a "progressive rock club" and
"one of the best progressive clubs in the country":


I wish members would stop posting these inane proof of progressive rock media posts or news articles from the 70s that never mentioned the artists that it was supposed to represent. This has been going on since the PA forum was founded and is as dumb now as it was then.

Edited by SteveG - May 09 2021 at 12:31
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Spaciousmind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 07 2020
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Spaciousmind Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 12:14
Originally posted by progaardvark progaardvark wrote:

It's like taking a head of cabbage, separating all the leaves, laying them neatly on a table until it is completely covered, and then blowing them off with a high-powered fan.

You are in prime form today! Tongue
Back to Top
progaardvark View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover/Symphonic/RPI Teams

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Sea of Peas
Status: Offline
Points: 52595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote progaardvark Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 12:03
It's like taking a head of cabbage, separating all the leaves, laying them neatly on a table until it is completely covered, and then blowing them off with a high-powered fan.
----------
i'm shopping for a new oil-cured sinus bag
that's a happy bag of lettuce
this car smells like cartilage
nothing beats a good video about fractions
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 09:26
Originally posted by Deidre Deidre wrote:

Are Rush actually Prog? Well, at the time when Rush were a current band, they were considered as a hard-rock band and there's no doubt about that. However, they were among, let's say, "intellectual" hard-rock bands whose heavy music has been regarded beyond that "just for fun" heavy stuff like, for example, Slade were back then. Rush were among hard-rock bands like Blue Öyster Cult, Black Sabbath, Uriah Heep and Rainbow. Now their fans tag some of Rush's best songs as "Heavy Prog" and I have no problem with that at all.
A cover of a hard-rock magazine from 1986.

You do realise that the two are not mutually exclusive, right? It is possible to be hard rock AND prog, just as it is possible to be folk AND prog, or metal AND prog, etc. etc. etc.

The thing is with language is that it changes and evolves, and labels and definitions do also. And over time, this always causes arguments. Real life doesn’t live forever in neat little boxes. We can delve deep int semiotics and talk about signifier and signified as much as you like, but it doesn’t change what is, only how we describe it.

The most frustrating thing I find with genres and labels, when it comes to music, is that it is often those who have come to the music later, who try to impose their understanding of the definition on an earlier time. That’s not to say that either understanding is right or wrong, so much as appropriate or inappropriate for a particular history. Anyone attempting to match the modern understanding of prog which the original scope of what was called progressive, will find a certain amount of disconnect, even though the two are similar concepts and have overlapping “definitions”.

Back to Top
Spaciousmind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 07 2020
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Spaciousmind Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 09:23
Originally posted by nick_h_nz nick_h_nz wrote:

Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Wrong Nick, we did not go around as kids and say "we dunno what we are".  We went to progressive rock concerts and if someone asked what we liked we said "I like progressive rock".  It's the latter generations that are trying to place bands into buckets and tie pretty little pink bows around the term.
We knew what we were and what music we listened to and what concerts we went to.  it's kind of insulting to be redefined by people 50 years later.

None of that is what I said! 😄

I am not trying to put anything into boxes at all. All I said was that what the progressive box meant then is not what the progressive box means now, because latter generations are making the pretty little pink bows. If anything, everything you’ve said matches what I believe and think.

So, you’re not actually disagreeing with anything I’ve said. 🤷🏻‍♂️

(Although, I guess it could be another Nick you are replying to?)



Good I am glad we agree!  It's the papers back that that confused things often.  If something did not fit into a pop chart they listed it as progressive.  But it probably did good for sales either way.  I actually bought Commander Cody because it was listed to find out after I listened to it that it was Southern Rock a band from Texas i believe.  Not really progressive at all but I still kinda liked the album back then for getting a taste of what people in Texas liked to hear.  I guess from someone in the UK that might have been seen progressive by the paper that listed the chart as it was unlikely that something similar was sold at that time.
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 9050
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 09:19
Originally posted by uduwudu uduwudu wrote:

Rush prog rock? Yes.

Glad that's cleared up.


Thank you! After 15 pages I got a bit worried. Now I will be able to sleep tight again... Wink



The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 09:16
Originally posted by Spaciousmind Spaciousmind wrote:

Wrong Nick, we did not go around as kids and say "we dunno what we are".  We went to progressive rock concerts and if someone asked what we liked we said "I like progressive rock".  It's the latter generations that are trying to place bands into buckets and tie pretty little pink bows around the term.
We knew what we were and what music we listened to and what concerts we went to.  it's kind of insulting to be redefined by people 50 years later.

None of that is what I said! 😄

I am not trying to put anything into boxes at all. All I said was that what the progressive box meant then is not what the progressive box means now, because latter generations are making the pretty little pink bows. If anything, everything you’ve said matches what I believe and think.

So, you’re not actually disagreeing with anything I’ve said. 🤷🏻‍♂️

(Although, I guess it could be another Nick you are replying to?)


Back to Top
Spaciousmind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 07 2020
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 724
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Spaciousmind Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 08:43
Wrong Nick, we did not go around as kids and say "we dunno what we are".  We went to progressive rock concerts and if someone asked what we liked we said "I like progressive rock".  It's the latter generations that are trying to place bands into buckets and tie pretty little pink bows around the term.
We knew what we were and what music we listened to and what concerts we went to.  it's kind of insulting to be redefined by people 50 years later.


Edited by Spaciousmind - May 09 2021 at 08:43
Back to Top
nick_h_nz View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Metal / Heavy Prog Team

Joined: March 01 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 6737
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nick_h_nz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 08:34
Originally posted by Deidre Deidre wrote:

Originally posted by Un Amico Un Amico wrote:

I mean it's not what they called themselves at the time, whereas jazz musicians were always jazz, Blues was always Blues, Reggae was Reggae since it began, Folk was Folk etc. What we now call Prog did not exist as a definition in the early Seventies. The Seventies were the only decade that really mattered by the way. Prog musicians of today are mere replicants.

I'm afraid that what we call Prog(ressive rock) did exist as early as 1970. For instance, here's a local newspaper announcing of the first closure of the Friars club in South East England, where it's described as a "progressive rock club" and "one of the best progressive clubs in the country.

Sorry, but you’re wrong. As per my earlier reply within this thread, “Progressive“ didn’t have the meaning then that we have instilled in it now, as is evidenced by the cuttings in the booklets for the Krimson 30th anniversary series, where several “progressive charts” are included. For example this one, dated 18 Dec 1971, listing “the week’s best-selling 15 progressive albums”. The artists?

1. Led Zeppelin
2. ELP
3. King Crimson
4. Yes
5. John Lennon

6. Rod Stewart
7. Isaac Hayes
8. Pink Floyd (someone refuting your suggestion that they weren’t considered prog)
9. Wings
10. The Who

11. Cat Steven’s
12. Commander Cody and his Lost Planet Airmen (who? Sounds prog, though! 😜)
13. Santana
14. “New Riders of the Purple Sage” - Various Artists
15= The Doors
15= Traffic

Now there’s plenty there that is in PA as either prog or prog-related, but clearly progressive in the ‘70s meant something different than we think of it now.

Back to Top
uduwudu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote uduwudu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 07:18
Rush prog rock? Yes.

Glad that's cleared up.

Hidden bonus. Pink Floyd prog?

Yes.


Back to Top
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guldbamsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 03:05
Humility is such an old fashioned thing...sadly. I miss folks like that...gifted musicians with both feet planted in the ground.
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
DaleHauskins View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2005
Location: So.California
Status: Offline
Points: 239
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DaleHauskins Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 09 2021 at 02:49
I love the quote from Neil Peart who when asked what was it like to be the greatest drummer replied..."I don't know, you better ask Jon Hiseman!" “Jon was the biggest influence on my own personal drum development making me look beyond rock to jazz playing”
https://chriswelchonline.com/a-tribute-to-jon-hiseman/
Dale Hauskins
(858) 401-2973
(310) 293-0432
https://artistecard.com/Dalehauskins

Back to Top
Frenetic Zetetic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2017
Location: Now
Status: Offline
Points: 9233
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Frenetic Zetetic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2021 at 23:57
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

If Rush weren't prog then neither were Kansas, Pink Floyd, Jethro Tull, The Moody Blues, etc. The list could just keep going. Not all of their material was prog but the same could be said about a lot of bands considered prog.

...Then it shouldn't surprise you that some (certainly not me) indeed don't consider any of what you listed as prog, lol.

"I am so prog, I listen to concept albums on shuffle." -KMac2021
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13227
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2021 at 21:13
Originally posted by Un Amico Un Amico wrote:

I mean it's not what they called themselves at the time, whereas jazz musicians were always jazz, Blues was always Blues, Reggae was Reggae since it began, Folk was Folk etc. What we now call Prog did not exist as a definition in the early Seventies. The Seventies were the only decade that really mattered by the way. Prog musicians of today are mere replicants.

You are incorrect. The word "jazz" was not associated with the musical form until about 1915 in Chicago (where previously "jazz" was referred to as "blues"). The word migrated south to New Orleans and was first in print in 1916. Previously the musical form was known as "ragtime" in the Big Easy. So, in that sense "prog" was know as "rock" in the 1970s, and the word prog was used later to delineate a specific genre. 

And even "blues" music wasn't blue at the point of origin, and the term did not come into vogue until the turn of the 20th century; however the word itself has described melancholy for centuries. In the 14th century Chaucer wrote:

Lo, yond the sunne, the candel of jelosye!
Wyth teres blewe and with a wounded herte
Taketh your leve.

(Behold the sun yonder, the candle of jealousy! With blue tears and with wounded heart, take your leave.)

Naming conventions for musical genres did not always spring fully formed at their inception. It's a silly idea, actually. No one called classical music "classical" back when Bach or Vivaldi were composing, or even Mozart, for that matter. The term didn't appear in the Oxford English Dictionary until 1829, and was used primarily as a means to categorize the period between Bach and Beethoven as a golden age of music.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Un Amico View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2021
Location: Tauranga, NZ
Status: Offline
Points: 114
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Un Amico Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2021 at 20:17
I mean it's not what they called themselves at the time, whereas jazz musicians were always jazz, Blues was always Blues, Reggae was Reggae since it began, Folk was Folk etc. What we now call Prog did not exist as a definition in the early Seventies. The Seventies were the only decade that really mattered by the way. Prog musicians of today are mere replicants.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17966
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2021 at 09:14
Originally posted by Un Amico Un Amico wrote:

I do not doubt it. After being told for 50 years that what one does is called 'Progressive' and not having a better word for it, one does eventually give in and accepts the honors and the adoration.
Not sure what you mean here, what would you like it to be called? It is 'Progressive' because its progressive, its a noun not an adjective like the word 'prog'.
That's like saying 'Jazz' should not be called jazz....
Back to Top
Un Amico View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 01 2021
Location: Tauranga, NZ
Status: Offline
Points: 114
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Un Amico Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2021 at 02:55
AND he had James Dewar...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 27>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.205 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.