Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Posted: March 15 2010 at 16:43
richardh wrote:
Although one of my favourite bands I do think there is a massive Genesis bias on this website with many preferring the calm preciseness of Banks to the energy of Emerson. Ok fair enough as its a matter of taste but I think it does mean their albums are a bit overated.SEBTP has some dull stuff particularly More Fool Me,The BAttle Of Epping Forest and I know what I Like yet people complain about Benny The Bouncer which is a whole ..ermmm..2 minutes NOT the interminable ten minutes or whatever of Battle Of Epping Forest.Oh well.
You know, Richard, Micky and I were talking about exactly the same thing a couple of days ago - how for some people "Benny the Bouncer" or "Jeremy Bender" are bad, while the filler on SEBTP (which is a big favourite of mine anyway) is great. I suppose it's all a matter of taste, though it would be nice if people didn't try to present it as fact.
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Posted: March 15 2010 at 16:42
richardh wrote:
Although one of my favourite bands I do think there is a massive Genesis bias on this website with many preferring the calm preciseness of Banks to the energy of Emerson. Ok fair enough as its a matter of taste but I think it does mean their albums are a bit overated.SEBTP has some dull stuff particularly More Fool Me,The BAttle Of Epping Forest and I know what I Like yet people complain about Benny The Bouncer which is a whole ..ermmm..2 minutes NOT the interminable ten minutes or whatever of Battle Of Epping Forest.Oh well.
Oeps... Obviously I meant "More Fool Me" for SEBTP and not "Mad Mad Moon".
My only discrepancy is that I quite like The Battle Of Epping Forest
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Posted: March 15 2010 at 16:13
Gerinski wrote:
Regardless of all their ups and downs and weaker songs, I absolutely love ELP. That's why I started the other thread of 'What's wrong with ELP?', it still does not fit into my head that this amazing band has got NOT EVEN ONE album with 5 stars at PA, I find it unbelievable.
When I see for example that Arena's Contagion, or Mike Oldfield's Amarok to name a couple have 5 stars... sure they are good albums and all my respect to Arena and Oldfield, but that they can be rated higher than ELP debut, Pictures, Tarkus, Trilogy, Brain Salad or Welcome Back ??? sorry I still do not get it
Some people say they would not rate ELPs albums with 5 stars because of Are You Ready Eddy, or of Lucky Man or of Benny the Bouncer... well I think that's very cruel, 'Mad Mad Moon' is not a masterpiece and 'I know what I like' neither in my opinion, but I still give 5 stars to Selling England by the Pound (as most others do, seen that it's got the 5 star average).
Although one of my favourite bands I do think there is a massive Genesis bias on this website with many preferring the calm preciseness of Banks to the energy of Emerson. Ok fair enough as its a matter of taste but I think it does mean their albums are a bit overated.SEBTP has some dull stuff particularly More Fool Me,The BAttle Of Epping Forest and I know what I Like yet people complain about Benny The Bouncer which is a whole ..ermmm..2 minutes NOT the interminable ten minutes or whatever of Battle Of Epping Forest.Oh well.
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Posted: March 15 2010 at 12:18
Regardless of all their ups and downs and weaker songs, I absolutely love ELP. That's why I started the other thread of 'What's wrong with ELP?', it still does not fit into my head that this amazing band has got NOT EVEN ONE album with 5 stars at PA, I find it unbelievable.
When I see for example that Arena's Contagion, or Mike Oldfield's Amarok to name a couple have 5 stars... sure they are good albums and all my respect to Arena and Oldfield, but that they can be rated higher than ELP debut, Pictures, Tarkus, Trilogy, Brain Salad or Welcome Back ??? sorry I still do not get it
Some people say they would not rate ELPs albums with 5 stars because of Are You Ready Eddy, or of Lucky Man or of Benny the Bouncer... well I think that's very cruel, 'Mad Mad Moon' is not a masterpiece and 'I know what I like' neither in my opinion, but I still give 5 stars to Selling England by the Pound (as most others do, seen that it's got the 5 star average).
I do not put ELP on the altar as demi-gods or whatever, they made some really weak songs and after Welcome Back they became bland and at times even pathetic, and I'm the first one to say so. But their good music... my god it belongs to the 'creme-de-la-creme' without question!
All the prog superbands happened by the chance of great musicians coming together, and if this is true for nearly all of them, even more in the case of ELP. Keith was a genius during his inspired years (it's always difficult to understand how such genius can fade away, but it certainly did) and his ability and sensitivity with the piano was probably the best in prog, and it's with the piano where you see who's really the king. It's not that difficult to sound spectacular with a powerful synth, but playing classical piano can not be pretended, either you can or you can not.
Greg had one of the best voices around and was really cool with the bass.
Finally Carl has always had such a unique style, unortodox for the rock scene, taking the sticks in jazz-manner, playing with an unusually stiff attitude and mixing techniques of percussion with those of drumming. I have heard quite a few professional drummers critisizing him for his style and body language, but the fact is that he played some amazing parts, it fitted with Keith's way of playing and gave the band a very personal sound, different from either the rock-oriented drummers as well as from the jazz-oriented ones.
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Posted: March 14 2010 at 22:44
I was listening to Pictures at an Exhibition once again today, and I guess I must say it really is my favourite album from them. All other albums have their weak or annoying parts (as well as their really great ones), but by listening to this one again, the "weak" song (the second Promenade with The Sage) are in fact rather beautiful (not as much as Take a Pebble or In the Beginning, but still nice), and the "annoying" song (The Curse of Baba Yaga) is indeed rather fun, I rather liked all the instrumental parts, the one thing I still find somewhat annoying in this son is the vocals (this is mainly the sort of vocals that makes some ELP songs annoying for me). The Great Gates of Kiev is nice too, though not a highlight. The rest of the album is really fabulous.
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 799
Posted: March 14 2010 at 16:34
I absolutely love ELP. I find them to be one of the boldest and most entertaining of all of the prog bands of the 70's.
As far as their importance in rock history, no other band has done so much to make the synthesizer a lead instrument in rock , and none other has done more to fuse jazz and classical influences into rock.
Just as Windows is the most reviled software because it is the most ubiquitous, the same can be said for ELP. The loathing is exaggerated because they are so fun to dislike for many. But not all of their songs were over-the-top - Greg Lake's simple but beautiful acoustic songs serve as a nice contrast, and the ragtime numbers added a little comic relief as well. No other band can cover a piece like "Pictures at an Exhibition", yet still sound like they are having fun.
That sense of fun and showmanship is what, imho, is missing from modern prog.
Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8615
Posted: March 14 2010 at 16:26
I really think highly of ELP's early recordings, especially the debut album, which is their best. They were trend setters, and justifiably so. I am not a big fan of Brain Salad Surgery, or any that came after it. A group should be judged by their music, and that of early ELP is of a really high quality-i just cannot dismiss them as being pretentious or pompos because the music speaks of something beyond that. They were an inspiration to so many groups, especially my favourite band, Germany's Triumvirat. Only one thing is worse than people dumping on ELP's music, people who dismiss Triumvirat!
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Posted: March 14 2010 at 14:24
micky wrote:
have posted this before (with permission ) and this is a good place to post it again. One of the more insightful things I've seen written about ELP. From John McFerrin's excellent review site...
ALthough its an interestingly written peice he's actually way off the mark with the comment about Tarkus.This was composed by Emerson for exactly what he dismisses it as '' a medium for the grandiose ambitions of Emerson''. As is well known to ELP fans this caused considerable friction between Lake and Emerson as Lake considered it a solo peice and even threatened to leave the band. Of course he backed down and added the extra parts and the album became a big hit .
The biggest and most important ELP tracks were very obviously driven by Emerson and Lake was bright enough to let him have his head despite his own personal misgivings.This is because when it comes down to it there is no substitute for talent.Greg Lake although a fine musician and a sometimes good lyricist knows where he stands in the general scheme of things.
Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Posted: March 14 2010 at 13:51
Once again my friends, allow me my indulgence. There was no better band than ELP during their classic years. And yes I'm comparing them with Yes, KC, Tull, and any and all of that ilk.
I've said it before. Emerson was the Hendrix of the Hammond organ. No one, before or after, to this day, pulled more rock sounds out of that particular instrument. And no one was more visionary with regard to the Moog's possibilities. And yes it all became theatrics and spinning pianos and synths that sprung wings and carpets and gongs down the road. But early on, oh what a band.
Go, listen to Knife-Edge, listen to Tarkus, listen to Blues Variation, hell, listen to Jerusalem and that Ginastera track.
Really? They suck? I think it was Lake told the tale, the first 'song' they learned to play was Pictures At An Exhibition. Really? Name any other band that has those sorts of cojones. Really. Name one.
Can you tell me where we're headin'?
Lincoln County Road or Armageddon.
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Posted: March 14 2010 at 12:46
Come on, what do you people like about ELP? What's your fav album? Your fav song? Your fav member? There's a lot of talk (once again) about what people despise of them, and what you don't not like (I hope I didn't make this too confusing). But we should rather talk about what we do like. Now, what about Pictures at an exhibition? It may not have been their first album, but these were their first concerts with which they became known. For me, Promenade, The Gnome, The Old Casle with Blues Variations, Promenade with the first part of The Hut of Babba Yaga stand out. I even like Nutrocker quiet a bit. Ofcourse it goes without saying that keyboards are wonderful, but I think drums, and even bass, deserve a mention. It's not so common for the drums to follow the melody the way Palmer does in many moments of this album (usually they just do rithm), and I really liked the way they sounded.
Joined: March 28 2009
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 732
Posted: March 14 2010 at 09:56
I'll have to take the time to read through the thread later in the week, but I'll just pop in now and at least say HERE, HERE on the notion that ELP is a group that could really use more appreciation at PA.
Why must my spell-checker continually underline the word "prog"?
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Posted: March 14 2010 at 08:51
ExittheLemming wrote:
I think those people who have a reasonable grasp of the lineage of Rock music from the late 60's, even if they don't care for ELP's music or loathe Prog, would acknowledge the trio as an indispensable part of the genre's rich legacy.
in all fairness... I think many do. Here it gets muddy because people tend to think in terms of what they like rather than in terms of the genre itself. I think many do have a good grasp of the lineage and history of prog.. they just don't think in those terms just what they like.
Due to their massive global success and very high profile that probably peaked circa 1974, those who despise Prog have made ELP culpable for the sins of the entire 1st generation of proggers. (and more) Certainly they were flamboyant, hedonistic, ostentatiously wealthy and egotistical but are we to believe that the 'terminally hip' Stones, Oasis, Sabbath, Who, Status Quo, Beatles, Queen, Chilli Peppers, Sex Pistols, Nirvana, Deep Purple, Zep etc eschewed entirely such decadent Rock'n'Roll traits ?
let's face it... has there EVER been a group with a larger kick me sign attached to them than ELP. They aren't hip to like... they are hip to kick. Call it a perverse kind of love. Is Keith Richards a non-smoking, tee-total, vegetarian, christian, tree hugging celibate who lives in a one bedroom flat on a council estate and gives all his royalties to a drug rehabilitation centre ?
There are possibly three areas where Prog is deemed to have declared war on the aesthetic ideals of those who profess to speak for 'the kids on the street'
1 - A degree of virtuosity is required to play Prog. It's an entry level qualification and you cannot bluff yer way through Karn Evil 9 armed with three barre chords, a broom handle bass and a 4/4 tub thumpin' beat y'all. Ergo the entire genre is considered inaccessible and 'divorced from the reality of the streets bro'.
McFerrin made an excellent point in regards to this in his write-up on Yes.
2 - The subject matter of Prog is more often than not borderline sci-fi hippy cosmology, but more importantly it ain't remotely about disaffected yoof, teenage rebellion and slaughtering your parents with a six foot safety-pin.(then devouring their remains)
Very true.. I love prog. But unlike some... Prog is only one of many genres I love. Let's just say I do not consider the subject (lyrical) side of prog to be one of it's strong suits. Indulgent, pretentious music... yeah.. I can dig that. Some guy who play yer geetar trying to lecture about some philosophical drivel.. no thanks. Thank God for Italian prog.. where you can just enjoy the music.. and the voice as an instrument.
3 - Prog does has a tiny sliver of Jazz and R'n'B in its DNA but is for all intents and purposes unequivocally 'white' music that does not source its development from funk, soul, blues, motown, dance music or basic primal rock and roll. Without wishing to embroil us in undue controversy on an ELP appreciation thread, there is more than ample evidence to suggest that (exclusively white) music journalists in both the UK and USA have always had a covert racist agenda when it comes to bestowing their laurel wreaths on the heads of those they will subsequently decapitate before the month's out.
I've read of others saying something like that. Nothing to add to that however.
Edited by micky - March 14 2010 at 08:52
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
I think those people who have a reasonable grasp of the lineage of Rock music from the late 60's, even if they don't care for ELP's music or loathe Prog, would acknowledge the trio as an indispensable part of the genre's rich legacy. Due to their massive global success and very high profile that probably peaked circa 1974, those who despise Prog have made ELP culpable for the sins of the entire 1st generation of proggers. (and more) Certainly they were flamboyant, hedonistic, ostentatiously wealthy and egotistical but are we to believe that the 'terminally hip' Stones, Oasis, Sabbath, Who, Bowie, Beatles, Queen, Chilli Peppers, Sex Pistols, Nirvana, Deep Purple, Zep etc eschewed entirely such decadent Rock'n'Roll traits ? Is Keith Richards a non-smoking, tee-total, vegetarian, christian, tree hugging celibate who lives in a one bedroom flat on a council estate and gives all his royalties to a drug rehabilitation centre ?
There are possibly three areas where Prog is deemed to have declared war on the aesthetic ideals of those who profess to speak for 'the kids on the street'
1 - A degree of virtuosity is required to play Prog. It's an entry level qualification and you cannot bluff yer way through Karn Evil 9 armed with three barre chords, a broom handle bass and a 4/4 tub thumpin' beat y'all. Ergo the entire genre is considered inaccessible and 'divorced from the reality of the streets bro'.
2 - The subject matter of Prog is more often than not borderline sci-fi hippy cosmology, but more importantly it ain't remotely about disaffected yoof, teenage rebellion and slaughtering your parents with a six foot safety-pin.(then devouring their remains)
3 - Prog does has a tiny sliver of Jazz and R'n'B in its DNA but is for all intents and purposes unequivocally 'white' music that does not source its development from funk, soul, blues, motown, dance music or basic primal rock and roll. Without wishing to embroil us in undue controversy on an ELP appreciation thread, there is more than ample evidence to suggest that (exclusively white) music journalists in both the UK and USA have always had a covert racist agenda when it comes to bestowing their laurel wreaths on the heads of those they will subsequently decapitate before the month's out.
People who don't like ELP says it's too bombastic and technical! For me, those caracteristics are not bad in itself. I really think the classical influence in their music make it difficult to be appreciate by a large fans base. I really enjoy the ELP sounds especially for the keyboards of Keith Emerson, but also the great rhythm section with Carl Palmer. They made great albums, but it has gone downhill at the end of their career. The 4 first albums are definitely a must have in a progressive rock collection. After that they're some good songs scatter on every albums.
Yes, it's especially funny when that criticism comes from Dream Theater fans. Well, I suppose love is blind...
Yes, i am a DT fan and i like technical music but not simply technical like the band Protest for Hero. Sometimes too much of a good thing is bad. I think DT and ELP have melody and emotions in their songs depite all the technical elements.
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Posted: March 14 2010 at 07:54
have posted this before (with permission ) and this is a good place to post it again. One of the more insightful things I've seen written about ELP. From John McFerrin's excellent review site...
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Posted: March 14 2010 at 07:53
rdtprog wrote:
People who don't like ELP says it's too bombastic and technical! For me, those caracteristics are not bad in itself. I really think the classical influence in their music make it difficult to be appreciate by a large fans base. I really enjoy the ELP sounds especially for the keyboards of Keith Emerson, but also the great rhythm section with Carl Palmer. They made great albums, but it has gone downhill at the end of their career. The 4 first albums are definitely a must have in a progressive rock collection. After that they're some good songs scatter on every albums.
Yes, it's especially funny when that criticism comes from Dream Theater fans. Well, I suppose love is blind...
People who don't like ELP says it's too bombastic and technical! For me, those caracteristics are not bad in itself. I really think the classical influence in their music make it difficult to be appreciate by a large fans base. I really enjoy the ELP sounds especially for the keyboards of Keith Emerson, but also the great rhythm section with Carl Palmer. They made great albums, but it has gone downhill at the end of their career. The 4 first albums are definitely a must have in a progressive rock collection. After that they're some good songs scatter on every albums.
Music is the refuge of souls ulcerated by happiness.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.672 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.