Why is Tull's "A Passion Play" rated so low? |
Post Reply | Page <1 8910 |
Author | |
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Offline Points: 43517 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
4 stars (4.02) is not a bad/low rating...
|
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
mmmhhh!!!... my current APP review on PA was rewritten after a forced strong exposure, but I still couldn't manage to permeate what it's about (even not worrying about that stupid Hare piece), probably because of its inn-density (rather than intensity) Clearly, the Mad Flauter thought he couldn't go wrong after TAAB's immense (and surprising to many) success and his grandiosely ambitious ideas would start to crumble with the D'Ysaster thing and the War Child fiasco. He forgot to make an accessible storyline for APP Interesting to note that The Who's Pete Townshend suffered also a crush in his overly-ambitious Lifehouse project, squashed around that same time.
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 27956 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
because it's just an opinion. There are 1000's of great prog albums so not everything can be at the top. The PA list is just a list of albums and the order is not that important really although I'm glad that CTTE is top. Beyond that I'm not really fussed.
|
|
Progosopher
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 12 2009 Location: Coolwood Status: Offline Points: 6467 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I love APP. It is a wild ride of styles and images. It also has a rather strange sound to it thanks to the saxophones and synthesizers used, and yes, it is dense to the point of obscurity. Not an easy album for most to get into, which is why it tends to be rated so low. Repeated listens yields rewards though. After decades, it is still revealing nuances and subtleties to me. Still, if it does not grab the listener on a first or second listen, most will abandon it.
|
|
The world of sound is certainly capable of infinite variety and, were our sense developed, of infinite extensions. -- George Santayana, "The Sense of Beauty"
|
|
kenethlevine
Special Collaborator Prog-Folk Team Joined: December 06 2006 Location: New England Status: Offline Points: 8950 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
like Oldfield's Amarok, it seems averse to exploring its good ideas, instead bounding from one to the next. Unlike you Martin, I gave up after a couple of listens, and so I pretty much concur with your original assessment
|
|
Barbu
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 09 2005 Location: infinity Status: Offline Points: 30850 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Inaccessible music and repulsive at first listen. I love it today but it was hard work, took me many spins before I start enjoying it.
|
|
Sandro28grizz
Forum Newbie Joined: October 02 2019 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Not talking about the PA rating, just in general. Even among prog fans the album seems to be a bit divisive, but why? On the surface it would seem to have everything that a prog fan would love...it's got a wide variety of instruments, styles, and time signatures, the band's playing is killer throughout, and almost all the individual sections are great songs in their own right. Yeah "The Hare..." section is pretty stupid, but it's meant to be...it's just a light-hearted break from the dense material surrounding it and the absurdity of it is good for a chuckle. The album's concept is a bit convoluted, sure, but so is TLLDOB's concept, and that one is considered a classic of the genre. So what gives?
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 8910 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |