UK Politics |
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Author | ||
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
Topic: UK Politics Posted: January 14 2011 at 16:26 |
|
Yep! Back to the 80's, but this time with an even bigger national debt. Cameron must be loving it, he can fleece the poor and blame it all on labour, while secretly knowing that he would have done exactly the same re; the bank bailouts.
|
||
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
||
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
Posted: January 14 2011 at 06:17 | |
http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2011/01/14/eric-pickles-branded-the-worst-secretary-of-state-61634-27983620/#ixzz1B0l9NdTz
"While the city [Newcastle] has lost £98 per head the likes of Surrey have lost just £9 per head." Rob the poor to feed the rich. Classic Tories. |
||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: January 07 2011 at 11:01 | |
A forest should be run as a forestry commission and as an independent body with both inputs from the users and the local communities. This is how some forests here in Scotland has been ran since the forest fiasco in the middle of The Great War (WWI) which almost lost Great Britain that war. This has been a good solution. Btw you can also close down incompetent corporations by stop buying anything from them. This actually far more than within a state where politicians covers each others back or keep themselves in power through terror. The history is littered with failed private enterprises and socalled big names suddenly going bankrupt.
Edited by toroddfuglesteg - January 07 2011 at 11:06 |
||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13770 |
Posted: January 07 2011 at 10:53 | |
However, the idea that large private or privatised corporations are model examples of how to run an organisation is also complete fantasy. In fact, many are worse run, rip us all off, and aren't even remotely democratically accountable. Therein lies the difference. At least with incompetent state organisations, you can kick the buggers out at an election. I am also in favour of elected senior officials, given that they make most of the decisions anyway, get paid a fortune, and are generally bloody useless at it. |
||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: January 07 2011 at 09:32 | |
The history of state run forests around the world is a history of corruption, gross crimes against the environment, using the forests as baits in elections and so forth. The UK state has also shown themselves unable to even run a barbrawl. In any case, most of the most important forests are already in private hands and inaccessable to even ramblers. I have one in my local area with "keep out" signs. Hence; I will not loose sleep over this......... if it was not for this being the mating season for the urban foxes. |
||
mystic fred
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
Posted: January 07 2011 at 09:13 | |
there will be nothing left to privatise after that
.
|
||
Prog Archives Tour Van
|
||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13770 |
Posted: January 07 2011 at 05:59 | |
The review was commissioned by the last Brown led Labour shower, not the present bunch. As with all such reviews/commissions, it was a done deal before they even met or "did any work". Such reviews have always been Whitehall's way of desanitising or making respectable unpopular decisions. It is an utter certainty that the last Government would have implemented this as well, as it was their clear policy, which makes Milliband's opposition all the more hypocritical (ditto VAT rise and cuts to civil service numbers BTW). They really are all as bad as each other. I'm surprised, therefore, that they spent this much. |
||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: January 07 2011 at 05:19 | |
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=414764&c=1
The review that sparked the government's transformation of higher education in England spent the "astonishingly low" sum of £68,000 on research - with nearly all of that going on an unpublished opinion survey of students and parents. |
||
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
Posted: December 23 2010 at 12:16 | |
I'm glad you found this thread again, Alex. I've been meaning to discuss the Vince Cable debacle.
I'm not sure what to think, really. I agree with Vince about stopping Herr Murdoch buying the full rights to BSkyB (Not that I watch Sky but still) but now he's totally balls everything up and yes, I think he should be sacked. He should know better than to blab to giggly girls about his intentions. I'd much rather he spoke out properly to the press, than keeping it mostly to himself and some "constituents" posing as reporters. However, the Tories know he'd be too powerful on the back benches and Clegg also doesn't want to lose him. So he has to stay. It's a terrible thing. Oh and yes, so is privatising the forests. I've not heard about that anywhere besides that article. More people need to know. |
||
|
||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: December 23 2010 at 09:56 | |
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32550 |
Posted: November 28 2010 at 20:05 | |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Offline Points: 17130 |
Posted: November 28 2010 at 19:38 | |
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 12:58 | |
Haha - neither do we 'cept our Dear Leader doesn't have a crown
|
||
lazland
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 28 2008 Location: Wales Status: Offline Points: 13770 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 12:47 | |
Emergency budgets are generally only used, as this year, when there is a change of government. It's the new lots way of telling the old lot what a bunch of arseholes they are and what a mess they left. It is decided upon in the same way as ordinary budgets - presented to The House of Commons as a draft bill, amended and debated in committee stages, and then kicked upstairs to The House of Lords (who cannot vote it out), amended further, then presented again to The Commons, who vote on the final bill and any further amendments. The final bill then goes to our beloved Queen Brenda to sign it into law as an Act of Parliament. We don't do things simple here |
||
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time! |
||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 12:00 | |
I was reading a bit on the "emergency budget" - does the Chancellor of the Exchequer recommend a budget that is then voted on in Parliament, similar to how we operate here?
|
||
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 11:51 | |
Oh and I've just found out David Miliband is taking a back seat and not putting his name down for a cabinet position.
As much as I am not really keen on his politics, I do think he should have had a place on the cabinet. |
||
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 11:48 | |
"And if you want to know the title of this number
It is a Major Dennis Bloodnok Rock'n'Roll Call rhumba" ...oh well, makes a change from the normal timewarp punchline, even if no one gets it
|
||
What?
|
||
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 11:42 | |
More central. He hates the term Red Ed. A shame really. A move to the left is what they actually need.
However, he's much better than David Miliband. He wants to unite the party in voting for AV as well. I'm also very pleased he's taken that stance on the illegal war. Fair play to him. If it stirs up the rest of the party, so what? We need someone a little more his own man/woman. Ed Miliband wouldn't have been my choice though. Having said that, none of them would have been. If Jon Cruddas had become leader, then I'd have been happy but he didn't stand in the end. What worries me though is, where have all the lefties gone? Why is the Labour Party going away from the left? It worries me that barely anyone is of a more left-persuasion now, except the old guard. In fact, I'm pretty sure I heard Tony Benn say he doesn't class himself as left-wing either! Hmm. Edited by James - September 29 2010 at 11:43 |
||
|
||
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
Posted: September 29 2010 at 10:11 | |
So then, Labour has a new leader and, surprise surprise... it's a Miliband! Still, at least it wasn't the New Labour apologist Miliband snr. However calculated and disingenuous, I can't tell you how relieved I was to hear the leader of the Labour Party apologising for their idiotic war.
So, did Labour make the right choice? Will Ed Miliband really be in the pocket of the unions (as our right wing press are screeching incessantly)? What will this "new generation" of Labour look like? A return to the left, or a shuffle to the centre? |
||
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
Posted: September 21 2010 at 08:11 | |
Ah.
Fair enough. I was getting confused! |
||
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |