Albums with bad production/recording quality/sound |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: August 21 2023 at 12:39 |
|
I'd say it depends on what type of music you are making. The "live magic" may be missing in studio recordings with overdubs, but then the "studio magic" may sometimes be missing in live performances as well. Trying to record, say, classical music by overdubbing will probably cause miserable results, and the same goes for a lot of jazz. But then there is music where studio experimentation and sound production is a big part of the overall expression.
|
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would say that bad recording may not happen as much today as it did in the past. Think of King Crimson and In the Court and Aqualung, both I believe had issues with the tape machine alignment of tape heads. For KC, that cut off the highs pretty hard, this is where that muffly sound comes from.
Most of what we eventually hear is all due to bad production and mastering, and especially in mixing an album. Albums from the 60s that suffered from lack of bass, that could have been done on purpose, some bass was cut due to the consumer equipment in use at the time, cartridges and tonearms that could not track these frequencies without severe mistracking, skipping or arms jumping out of the groove. This was the case for original BlueNote jazz records that Rudy Van Gelder recorded, cartridges could not track his recording so he would cut the bass back when cutting records. We don't have that issue with today's analog gear.
|
||
|
||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I've made comments about bands/music that is not recorded "live" in studio and how some of that magic is simply missing......Those comments were dismissed by others. That is unfortunate that people cannot hear what is missing in music that is recorded separately and then emailed back and forth and pieced together....To me this is one of the downsides of the whole digital thing.
|
||
|
||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm a big fan of C.V. Jørgensen, but his first album from 1974 sounds really awful (despite some interesting musical and lyrical ideas). Bad sound mixing, muddy vocals (it is difficult to hear what he is singing) + too many instrumental errors. For comparison, here's a song from his second album. Sounds much better: Edited by The Anders - August 20 2023 at 15:11 |
||
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 09 2019 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 11636 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
^I agree that some magic can only happen when the band plays together. However, Steely Dan "Aja" was mulitracked out the wazoo and is a perfect record for me.
|
||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't disagree with this at all. I was speaking strictly from a production perspective. The relief was to my ears, not my musical expectations.
|
||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I often have a big issue with records that sound too clean, and the beginning of digital recording is a good example of that. The sound becomes uninteresting, and there is often a lack of dynamics. I think especially some of the "old boys" rock albums from the 1990's suffer from that. A good example would be Dire Straits: On Every Street - an album I otherwise like, but the sound is just too boring. Or Voodoo Lounge by the Rolling Stones. Some of the amazing "ugliness" of their classic era records disappears out of the window.
Edited by The Anders - August 20 2023 at 10:29 |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I also want to mention Illusions on a Double Dimple by Triumvirat. The one thing that keeps this from being a total masterpiece imo is the drum sound. It has a thud thud drum sound that I find rather annoying. The next one Spartacus might not be perfect in that area but it's still an improvement over Dimple.
|
||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The record I have IS the original UK release. I don't live in America, and I have never actually listened to the Capitol albums (I prefer not to). It is not that the sound isn't clean enough, but that the stereo pan is too primitive, and some of the songs almost hurt.
|
||
Jared
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Offline Points: 19333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Well, there's the unexceptional 'One Little Victory', followed by 12 tracks which all sound the same to me.. seriously, I don't think I have another album where at any single point, I have absolutely no idea what I'm listening to, neither frankly do I care much... and this comes from a fan of 40 years...
|
||
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
||
Cristi
Special Collaborator Crossover / Prog Metal Teams Joined: July 27 2006 Location: wonderland Status: Online Points: 43764 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Crap?! That's harsh IMO, the remix improves on the original, makes the songs a bit more listenable.
Edited by Cristi - August 20 2023 at 05:00 |
||
Jared
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 06 2005 Location: Hereford, UK Status: Offline Points: 19333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It really was very bad indeed, wasn't it? But tbh, the remix didn't come as a great relief, it just re-affirmed in my mind that the album was in fact crap...
|
||
Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
|
||
Meltdowner
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 25 2013 Location: Portugal Status: Offline Points: 10232 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I don't know which version you heard but Nick Davies' remix improved the sound quality a lot.
|
||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Online Points: 11696 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Sorry, I'm rambling. I have bigger problems with clean, modern production in general than any Floyd 68/69... or even Nursery Cryme really. For Floyd I've never even thought about any sound issues, but my remaster with the Genesis-album admittedly latter blows my original pressing out of the water.
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hi, I would check the English import ... since many of the American versions were copies, and the last album that this happened to, was DSOTM (that I have seen -- I still have the import of this album!!!), where the English version was much cleaner. I found this out by accident btw, when the first Sgt Pepper's album I got happened to be the import, and the American version was not very good, and the sound effects and many bits were downplayed a lot. So, we know that Capitol, in America did not get the masters to get the albums done or released in America, or possibly made the call that the sound effects were not what radio wanted! ... AFAIK.
Edited by moshkito - August 19 2023 at 20:32 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 18301 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The last few by Deluge Grander. The first two sounded good but the later ones not so much. It's like the band were kicked out of a studio and forced to record in a basement or something.
|
||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm going to go with Rush Vapor Trails. One of the absolute worse. I can't, for the life of me, understand why RUSH would allow such a travesty with their name on it to be released. It was sooooo bad they ended up remixing the whole thing, not as a marketing gimmick, but because it was one huge steaming pile of turd. The remix was a relief to hear.
|
||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'll mention the original 1965 stereo mix of Rubber Soul where the left/right pan is often extreme. In loudspeakers it is probably OK, but with headphones it is not very pleasant to listen to. Normally I don't like it when old albums are remixed, but in this case I understand why it was done. The 1987 mix is much more pleasant. Otherwise I prefer the mono version. There is also David Bowie's 1969 album where the sound is very muddy, the balance between instruments is poor, and the production is messy. The exception is "Space Oddity" which is beautifully produced. I have to say, I don't find the sound of the Soft Machine that bad actually. The production is a bit amateurish (some equalizing to add more treble would be welcome, because there is a LOT of bass), but on the other hand I quite like that it isn't so streamlined. It gives it some charm and some edge. This is part of what I also like about Can's albums btw. Edited by The Anders - August 19 2023 at 17:57 |
||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Universal Totem Orchestra - Mathematical Mother I find not least the drums to be all too light, and yes, it definitely has diminished my enjoyment of this album so far, even I like much the music.
|
||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |