![]() |
Abortion |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Author | |||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: May 08 2022 at 20:50 |
||
>>I must I'm always amazed that Jen (who is such a "rebel") would choose to back options that would limit her own freedom (or at least other's freedom, if she doesn't want to exert that freedom)
![]() ![]() translation: "Jen does not think in accordance of what she should as per our federal masters and is therefore less than a woman. We also will call her insane because she dares to be a woman who expresses freedom of thought instead of marching lockstep with the rest of us"
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
actually, quite a few of them did.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
rogerthat ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yeah, albeit Ginsburg must share the blame for not retiring when Obama asked her to (and Obama tapped two male judges to retire and replaced them with female judges and yet 'the lady' didn't trust him or something). But really, if people who are pro-choice also had the same awareness of the President and Senate's role in appointing SC judges, this wouldn't have happened. If the right to abortion is that important, why wouldn't you vote straight Democrat in every general election as well as every mid term? Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
SteveG ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20617 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Edited by SteveG - May 09 2022 at 04:02 |
|||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Atavachron ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65616 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Funny how it's now the other way 'round. |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
![]() |
|||
The Dark Elf ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13229 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Please stop. The Constitution as a document is pliable and not set in stone; hence, the many necessary amendments added afterwards -- because for all its greatness and its potential, it is also a tragically flawed document. The fact that it can be altered as time goes on is one of the brilliant facets of the document. Because the Founders, for whatever their adherence to French Enlightenment ideals, were typical white, wealthy 18th century men. Evidently, they didn't consider it tyrannical to limit the rights of the Constitution to white males and thus eliminating women from the right to vote, and considering black slaves to be subhuman (enshrined in the 3/5ths of a person clause). Let's also not forget the Founders thought nothing of Native American genocide and the theft of their land. So spare me the 250 year old view of what constitutes "tyranny". There is any number of racist, misogynistic, religious and imperialist views that the Founders had that modern society would find appalling. Unless, of course, you identify as an 18th century person. Love the powdered wig.
Edited by The Dark Elf - May 08 2022 at 16:52 |
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
![]() |
|||
Grumpyprogfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: July 09 2019 Location: Kansas City Status: Offline Points: 12400 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Sean Trane ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20414 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I must I'm always amazed that Jen (who is such a "rebel") would choose to back options that would limit her own freedom (or at least other's freedom, if she doesn't want to exert that freedom) ![]() ![]()
Yup, it seems that the founders were not exactly "nice" or thoughtful, but they were certainly self-righteous ![]() AFAIAC, the first modern "tyrany" would be stopping someone from disposing of himself/herself.
|
|||
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
|||
![]() |
|||
Mirakaze ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Eclectic, JRF/Canterbury, Avant/Zeuhl Joined: December 17 2019 Location: (redacted) Status: Offline Points: 4234 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I wonder if they felt that owning slaves was tyrannical.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The Founders felt abortion was a tool of tyranny. I am of the same mindset.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Atavachron ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65616 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ I suspect that's all too true. We all do what we have to. |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Hewitt ![]() Forum Groupie ![]() ![]() Joined: December 12 2021 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
In the real world there is no choice between abortion and no abortion. The only choice we can make is between safe legal abortion or unsafe illegal abortion. It’s a no-brainer.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Sean Trane ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Prog Folk Joined: April 29 2004 Location: Heart of Europe Status: Offline Points: 20414 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
here is the composition of the US Supreme court and who nominated them: Italics : women Pro-Choice bold underlined anti-pro-choice Blue Dems Red Reps C Thomas (73yo) - Bush Sr - rabid anti - will most likely not retire until a Rep prez in place again Bryer (couldn't find his age) - Clinton (planning to retire in June - Biden expected to nominate Brown-Jackson) Roberts (67yo) - Dubya (pivot member - could go either way - was pro-Obamacare) Alito (72) - Dubya (says it's not the role of US SC to judge this matter - enforce it, but not make it evolve) Sotomayor (67yo) - Obama Kagan (62yo) - Obama Barrett (50yo) - Trump (ultra-catholic woman) Gorsuch (54yo) - Trump's (pro-discrimination) Kavanaugh (57yo) (accused of sex assault in the 80's - charges dropped) - Trump Oddly enough, it's the two Dubya nominations that could tip it towards Choice Steve: about the most-likely women to suffer from this ban, it's obvious that poor women will not be able to take "holidays" abroad to have it performed. To avoid getting spotted in clinics (and getting "publicity" from antis), more financially-affluent women take "holidays" abroad. See Sarah Waddington's indignation in front of Congress of a few days ago. .
|
|||
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword |
|||
![]() |
|||
ExittheLemming ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2007 Location: Penal Colony Status: Offline Points: 11420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
We're on page four without even a single Admin intervention. I'm not a Tibetan man but didn't wager we would reach this far. This thread's longevity is itself a fantastic argument for Pro Life.
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Atavachron ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65616 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact that Republicans are psychotic ... and they got a very good one. Edited by Atavachron - May 06 2022 at 22:55 |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
![]() |
|||
The Dark Elf ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13229 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Wrong. It is not "one opinion from one justice".... Writing for the five-justice majority, Justice Samuel Alito offers two reasons for this conclusion: The Constitution does not explicitly protect the right to abortion, and the right to obtain an abortion is neither “deeply rooted in [our] history and tradition” nor “essential to our Nation’s ‘scheme of ordered liberty.’” Welcome to the land of disinformation. You have been owned by Fox News. Alito's warped reasoning makes my skin crawl. What other "Rights" that we took for granted as being protected under the Constitution will no longer apply because Alito is an 18th century renaissance man? A women's right to vote? Hey, that's a 20th century innovation. Are we going to bring back slavery because Jefferson was knocking up the servants? And to top it off, three of the Justices who are part of that opinion -- Trump's chumps -- lied under oath about Roe v. Wade during their confirmation hearings.
Edited by The Dark Elf - May 06 2022 at 22:05 |
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
![]() |
|||
Atavachron ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65616 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
^ I think I have that on a t-shirt -
|
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
![]() |
|||
ExittheLemming ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2007 Location: Penal Colony Status: Offline Points: 11420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Can't help but be reminded of that quote of unknown origin: 'the beatings will continue until morale improves'
|
|||
![]() |
|||
darksinger ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 29 2006 Location: Durham, NC Status: Offline Points: 1091 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Nobody is taking away the precious "right" to kill unborn children. It is not even being "snatched" from people-the leak was one opinion from one justice and was leaked because the Democrats need a stalwart position to offset the fact this current administration is a mess. As far as my opinion on a "right for a woman to decide what to do with her body", my grandmother almost aborted my dad. I love my grandmother dearly. She was a great mom to my dad despite this and she was a wonderful, giving person. They had abortion back then. It was a poisonous pill of some sort. But had she gone through with it, she would have made a decision for so far five other people's bodies. So, I do not view abortion as "my body, my choice". I view it as "other people's bodies, my choice", because five of us did not have a say in the matter. With that said, I am not entirely against abortion because I do not feel a rape victim should be forced to carry her attacker's child or if a child is going to be born with defects that will only cause the child to live briefly and in pain, the parents should have a right to not let the child suffer. I do not hate women who get abortions because I feel they felt that was their only viable option and they had a hard decision to make. What I do hate is the marketing of abortion as if it is a soft drink with "cute" slogans such as "shout your abortion" and pretty spokespeople presenting some deluded nonsense-abortion is a serious decision! Often the women who get one are affected psychologically by it. It is not a style or an image. I also hate the politicizing of this leak over it-a person chose to violate the policies and procedures of the SCOTUS to leak a single draft of a single opinion from a single justice as a way to intimidate the SCOTUS to not do its duty of interpreting the Constitution.
Edited by darksinger - May 05 2022 at 21:40 |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Atavachron ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65616 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I said I'd start a fistfight if things got bad and I meant it. I still will, with pleasure. |
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |