REORGANISING PROG METAL |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Phil
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 17 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1881 |
Topic: REORGANISING PROG METAL Posted: October 27 2005 at 09:36 |
Thought someone would have done this by now....I've been following some
of the debate on re-organising "Prog-Metal". I think whatever happens
Mike has a thankless task!! I don't doubt for a minute that it's all
being done with the best of intentions.
So are you a prog-metal fan who thinks there should be more sophistication in categorisation of your favourite bands? Or are you someone who (like me) before visiting this site didn't know anything about prog-metal at all....would further categorisation confuse you....or might it help you explore this area of music further? ps this is only meant as a "straw poll" and is not meant to take the debate away from the main thread!! |
|
Mahonster
Forum Groupie Joined: August 15 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 52 |
Posted: October 27 2005 at 11:20 |
I say no if you mean subdividing the genres on this site even more.
Why? Because there's always going to be problems in catagorising bands
in genres, so by forming more sub-genres, you're just adding more
complications into the mix. I think prog-metal is specific enough.
|
|
Tristan Mulders
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 28 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1723 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 12:37 |
I came up with the idea (but suppose wasn't the only one thinking about it) so I'd say YES! |
|
Interested in my reviews?
You can find them HERE "...He will search until He's found a Way to take the Days..." |
|
Logos
Prog Reviewer Joined: March 08 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 2383 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 12:41 |
Yes, prog-metal, as it is, is a mess.
|
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 02 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10261 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 12:47 |
I'll restate my opinion: The whole project was started badly. If we go
re-organizing sub-genrés at all, then let's tackle the big ones first
(Art Rock and Symphonic). At least the proposal should have been
something like this:
I propose that we reorganize the genrés a little by subdividing the genrés further. We need volunteers for reorganising: Art Rock Symphonic Krautrock Prog-Metal etc. I myself volunteer for prog-metal. The way it is done now is extremely lopsided. Thius is not the prog-metal archives. This I would have fully appreciated. But I reject the way Mike went about it. It is lopsided and nothing but a big ballyhoo about prog-metal. Edited by BaldFriede |
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue. |
|
eduardossc
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 15 2005 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 257 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 13:33 |
Hi Phil: You know what would happen if this site decides to make a hundred different categories for "MEtal prog"?.... Well, many like you, who didn´t know about metal prog before this site, (Neither did I, and had heard Dream theatre for years thinking they played metal with a little and interesting twist) will come and read about ..I don´t know, 5 different categories. When they listen to one representative band from each, and find out they sound the same or barely different, they´ll be confused and will lose motivation to keep looking into the other categories. Plus, what´s the point of separating one band from others just for a particular detail in their sound, mood, style?...I say, just let music be.
|
|
Logos
Prog Reviewer Joined: March 08 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 2383 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:33 |
He was asked to do it, wasn't he? Edited by Logos |
|
stinkfist
Forum Groupie Joined: September 16 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 92 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 15:23 |
havin genres at all is just a bad idea
but if you MUST divide there should only be four Prog Metal Proto-Prog Prog Rock and a band can fit into all three categories |
|
how can this mean anything to me?
when i really dont feel a thing at all |
|
goose
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 20 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4097 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 19:06 |
|
|
sleeper
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 09 2005 Location: Entropia Status: Offline Points: 16449 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 19:39 |
I have supported Mike from the time he started the main thread so my answer is most definatly yes. I notice the debate on reorganizing symphonic prog has dropped of |
|
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
|
The Miracle
Prog Reviewer Joined: May 29 2005 Location: hell Status: Offline Points: 28427 |
Posted: October 28 2005 at 20:24 |
No, let's leave things as they are. as I said before: I think there's nothing wrong with all the sub-organization of genres. If someone has the time to do all this work, I think it's fine. It will make PA look more detailed and professional. On the other hand the sub organization is pretty useless because few people really care about the sub sub genres. "prog metal" or "symphonic prog" is enough for a person to know whether to research further on a band or not. All the sub sub genres will only be used by PA because no one else before cared enough to do it... which shows that wasn't necessary. And if sub organize, then it should of course be done to symphonic and prog metal, for they have the greatest diversity. There's too few zeuhl or krautrock and they're too original to be sub categorized like that. Another minus is that the sub categorization will spawn countless amounts of threads and arguments about what belongs where and what doesn't. And no one will come to any agreement because it is impossible. The borders inside a sub genre are too obscure to be able to organize them accurately. |
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Online Points: 21188 |
Posted: October 29 2005 at 08:19 |
So what if I had gone about it that way, had created that post and then had got started to work on Prog Metal ... would you then have agreed with splitting Prog Metal? Or are you just generally opposed to splitting Prog Metal, and are now trying to find reasons to make me look bad? Well, I guess that the old saying is right: No good deed goes unpunished. Well, I will to continue to organise Prog Metal anway. I doubt that it will be implemented too soon though, so you'll have plenty of time to reorganise the other genres as well. Maybe we could add a non-metal category for each added metal category (or 1.5 for each new metal category, to be precise) in order to ensure that Prog Metal remains underrepresented (10% of the bands, but only 6.6% of the categories)?
Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: October 29 2005 at 09:10 |
Mike, although I don't fully support the splitting of prog Metal or any Genre further, I fully support the way you have conducted yourself throughout this whole episode! It seems to me either sour grapes by the Bald duo or that they think thats everything has to be ok'd by them first. Carry on Mike you are gaining a supporter who was a little against these new subdivisions, but is now due to the reactions of the Bald pair fully behind you! |
|
Tristan Mulders
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 28 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1723 |
Posted: October 29 2005 at 11:45 |
Bravo! I was just about the say the same thing!
although I fully support the splitting of the genre Edited by king16 |
|
Interested in my reviews?
You can find them HERE "...He will search until He's found a Way to take the Days..." |
|
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |