Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog's Most Controversial Lyricist
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg's Most Controversial Lyricist

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 17>
Author
Message
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2012 at 06:14
Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

Originally posted by AlexDOM AlexDOM wrote:

Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

Four pages and not one person has Mentioned.....
Neil Morse.............another example of how main-stream religion has made everybody (including all those who've contributed to this thread)....imune to to the total bullsh*t that is fed to children every-day.....(and gullible adults of course)......
When everybody laughs (until the hoots of derision can be heard in every corner of the globe!) at the pathetic thought-control books of the monotheistic religions, THAT is the day that mankind has truly arrived at the gates of true enlightenment......Tongue

...or the Gates of Delirium

There are Neal Morse lyrics that are legitimately controversial; there was a discussion about Sola Scriptura not long ago, and I heard the opinion expressed that the album was offensive because it attacked the Catholic church.  While I have nothing in particular against the album (although I don't agree with all of the theology and don't particularly like Neal's portrayal of Luther) I can see where it might offend Catholic Christians.
Doesn't take a lot to offend any religious people....LOL but thats what happens if you base your life on the ramblings of some bronze age misogynistic old farts.....I still find society's attitude to sex and violence quite unbelievable. How can a (graphic portrayal) of a penis penetrating a vagina cause such horror when a knife being inserted into a womans throat is far more acceptible........Cool
Back to Top
giselle View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 18 2011
Location: Hertford
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2012 at 16:29
Jon Anderson for me, astonishingly naive or downright pretentious, I can't decide which.
Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 03 2012 at 17:44
Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

Originally posted by Ambient Hurricanes Ambient Hurricanes wrote:

Originally posted by AlexDOM AlexDOM wrote:

Originally posted by M27Barney M27Barney wrote:

Four pages and not one person has Mentioned.....
Neil Morse.............another example of how main-stream religion has made everybody (including all those who've contributed to this thread)....imune to to the total bullsh*t that is fed to children every-day.....(and gullible adults of course)......
When everybody laughs (until the hoots of derision can be heard in every corner of the globe!) at the pathetic thought-control books of the monotheistic religions, THAT is the day that mankind has truly arrived at the gates of true enlightenment......Tongue

...or the Gates of Delirium

There are Neal Morse lyrics that are legitimately controversial; there was a discussion about Sola Scriptura not long ago, and I heard the opinion expressed that the album was offensive because it attacked the Catholic church.  While I have nothing in particular against the album (although I don't agree with all of the theology and don't particularly like Neal's portrayal of Luther) I can see where it might offend Catholic Christians.
Doesn't take a lot to offend any religious people....LOL but thats what happens if you base your life on the ramblings of some bronze age misogynistic old farts.....I still find society's attitude to sex and violence quite unbelievable. How can a (graphic portrayal) of a penis penetrating a vagina cause such horror when a knife being inserted into a womans throat is far more acceptible........Cool


For me, it's simple: if I watch a graphic portrayal of sexual intercourse, I know I will be tempted to sin with impure thoughts.  If I watch a violent scene, I'm not prone to sin by having violent thoughts because of that, or to act on violent impulses.  That may be different for others; I can only witness to my own experience.  That's why I have no problem with violence in movies, whereas I shy away from watching movies with sex scenes.

There's also the point to consider that, whereas violence is an integral part of man's (and God's, from a Christian perspective) struggle against evil, and has a vital part in a story of good vs. evil, which, in a way, every good movie is.  Sex, however, was meant to be private, from a Christian point of view; whereas a war scene in a movie is a portrayal of something public, in a sense, in that it's a battle of good vs. evil which all humanity is ultimately a participant in, a sex scene makes a spectacle of the most intimate act that two human beings can participate in, meant, from a Christian perspective, for a married man and woman.

Also, you have to take into account the context and worldview of the portrayal of sex and violence; almost all movie sex scenes, from the Christian perspective, are depictions of sin (I'm under the impression that most sex scenes are between unmarried couples) but are usually not portrayed as such by the movie makers.  On the other hand, much of the violence portrayed in movies is justified (in self-defense, in a just war, in defense of others...) and unjust violence is often portrayed as evil, as it ought to be.  Obviously, this isn't always the case; in the movie Marley and Me, for example, there are scenes of intimacy and sex but they are between a married couple.  I saw that movie and had no problem with it (it was very boring though, I'd never want to watch it again).  You still have to consider, though, that to film a sex scene, you still have to foster intimacy between two people who (most likely) aren't married.
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
brainstormer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Points: 887
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 05 2012 at 09:01
Graphic sex, I believe, can lead many people to a type of infantilism,
a type of wish fulfillment by pornography.  I believe older generations
were much more sophisticated than what we may think.  If sex is kept
sacred, then more bonding can occur and people begin to understand
what they can get out of a romantic relationship, by also giving to it.
One has someone to spend one's time with, one doesn't compare that
person to a porn star or even any kind of "model."   One become humane.
Pornography abstracts this quality and tries to commodify it.

Check out the Singles Anonymous website for some modern
thought on remedying this problem.

--
Robert Pearson
Regenerative Music http://www.regenerativemusic.net
Telical Books http://www.telicalbooks.com
ParaMind Brainstorming Software http://www.paramind.net


Back to Top
DiamondDog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2011
Location: Cambridge
Status: Offline
Points: 320
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2012 at 06:40
I'm with the majority; Jon Anderson & Neil Peart
Back to Top
bensommer View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 64
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2012 at 18:54
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

  I can't think of anyone (except maybe Bernie Taupin) as likely to turn up on a list of Best Lyricists AND a list of Worst Lyricists. 

Nail=Hit on Head.

I often get straight up Douche Chills listening to Taupin's lyrics (most of them), and Peart's too (just some of them).

One thing in common between both? Neither writes the music.

Its inevitable when a composer (Elton John, Lifeson/Lee) is setting someone else's words exclusively that there will be some odd pairings once in a while


Edited by bensommer - August 09 2012 at 18:56
Back to Top
Jonathan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 18 2012
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2012 at 22:25
Well, Frank Zappa wrote controversial songs like "Magdalena" and "Brown Shoes Don't Make It".
Seriously, what was he thinking?
Back to Top
resurrection View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2010
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 01:43
Jon Anderson gets my vote - love or loathe his lyrics?
Back to Top
Jonathan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 18 2012
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 07:06

Who here agrees that "Brown Shoes Don't Make It" and "Magdelena", although Comedy songs, Crossed the line?

Back to Top
hobocamp View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 17 2010
Location: Fine Furniture
Status: Offline
Points: 525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 08:49
Without reading five pages of nominees, it's gotta be
ZAPPA.
Back to Top
mongofa View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2011
Location: Zanzibar
Status: Offline
Points: 410
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 12:21
A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
Back to Top
HarbouringTheSoul View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 21 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1199
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 13:03
Originally posted by mongofa mongofa wrote:

A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?

I've never heard a negative opinion about Beefheart's lyrics. How is he controversial?
Back to Top
Slaughternalia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 17 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 901
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 13:20
Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul HarbouringTheSoul wrote:

Originally posted by mongofa mongofa wrote:

A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?

I've never heard a negative opinion about Beefheart's lyrics. How is he controversial?
So XD randum lulomg
I'm so mad that you enjoy a certain combination of noises that I don't
Back to Top
theadolescentprogger View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: March 23 2012
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 88
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 12 2012 at 14:48
Frank Zappa.
Back to Top
mongofa View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2011
Location: Zanzibar
Status: Offline
Points: 410
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 13 2012 at 02:50
Originally posted by Slaughternalia Slaughternalia wrote:

Originally posted by HarbouringTheSoul HarbouringTheSoul wrote:

Originally posted by mongofa mongofa wrote:

A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?

I've never heard a negative opinion about Beefheart's lyrics. How is he controversial?
So XD randum lulomg
Smile
Back to Top
Jonathan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 18 2012
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 13 2012 at 22:04
Just a question, is anyone else on this site offended by "Magdalena" and/or "Brown Shoes Don't Make It"?
Back to Top
Ambient Hurricanes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 25 2011
Location: internet
Status: Offline
Points: 2549
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 13 2012 at 22:28
I think at least one of those was brought up before, which may be why your posts aren't generating as much discussion as you're looking for.  Still, one post is enough, no need to tell us about those songs again.


Edited by Ambient Hurricanes - August 13 2012 at 22:30
I love dogs, I've always loved dogs
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13227
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 13 2012 at 22:47
This is a confusing thread. We have posters talking about actual controversial lyricists (in that what they are saying may be beyond the pale or shocking), and also just plain bad lyricists who are only controversial in a roundabout way because some people think they are good. The two concepts are not necessarily congruent. 
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Mirror Image View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 13 2012 at 23:52
What about Damo Suzuki from Can?
“Music is enough for a lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music.” - Sergei Rachmaninov
Back to Top
M27Barney View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2012 at 06:53
Originally posted by brainstormer brainstormer wrote:

Graphic sex, I believe, can lead many people to a type of infantilism,
a type of wish fulfillment by pornography.  I believe older generations
were much more sophisticated than what we may think.  If sex is kept
sacred, then more bonding can occur and people begin to understand
what they can get out of a romantic relationship, by also giving to it.
One has someone to spend one's time with, one doesn't compare that
person to a porn star or even any kind of "model."   One become humane.
Pornography abstracts this quality and tries to commodify it.

Check out the Singles Anonymous website for some modern
thought on remedying this problem.

Only with the onset of recent cultural evolution has sex - been private,
in the past, tribal groups would have witnessed much more "Live" sex than the
average urbanite today (excluding swingers obviously).
Children would have watched adults engaged in sex...as still happens in
some societies even today.
Homo sapiens (today) is the only species that doesn't copulate in open view (Legally).
Thats due to cultural pressure.
But modern society's acceptance of graphic violence is far more troubling for a rational person.
Society's non-acceptance of graphic sex is almost wholly based on silly religious dogma.
Thats my point.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 17>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.293 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.