Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:13 |
^ agreed. Just more political games being played by Congress
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:48 |
Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years.
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:57 |
timothy leary wrote:
Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. |
Absolutely....it was time for this years ago. And term limits on Supreme Court judges also. None of these people need to be in there for life.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:59 |
John Mc Cain can go get a real job
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36333
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 19:08 |
Atavachron wrote:
^ Oh I don't see any email investigation going anywhere or having much weight if it did. It's largely what she keeps saying it is: trumped up politikal nonsense that any gov official could potentially face. Have you looked at the evidence in question; as far as I can tell it's all declassified if sensitive stuff that others had access to and adds up to about zero. But as you say, we'll see. | The email server investigation is ongoing (I don't expect her to be indicted), and a possible conflict of interest investigation when it came to Clinton Foundation donations is ongoing, as well as possible misuse of charitable funds. Certainly there is political motivation and collusion when it comes to such investigations.
|
|
Nogbad_The_Bad
Forum & Site Admin Group
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team
Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 20974
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 19:35 |
timothy leary wrote:
John Mc Cain can go get a real job
|
The rubber chicken circuit?
|
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com
https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 27 2016 at 21:24 |
sounds about right
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 02:46 |
dr wu23 wrote:
timothy leary wrote:
Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. |
Absolutely....it was time for this years ago. And term limits on Supreme Court judges also. None of these people need to be in there for life. |
oh, but we need them senile in the Supreme Court so that they will nod every bill through
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 08:53 |
I think it is Congress that approves bills
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13721
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 09:01 |
timothy leary wrote:
I think it is Congress that approves bills | As a Limey on the outside, that is what I thought as well
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 10:40 |
dr wu23 wrote:
timothy leary wrote:
Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. |
Absolutely....it was time for this years ago. And term limits on Supreme Court judges also. None of these people need to be in there for life. |
Not that I entirely disagree, but the trouble with term limits is that by the time the elected officials figure out their jobs and gain power/respect in their respective chambers, they are on their way out because they are termed out. You end up with a bunch of idealists with no experience. You also end up with a lot of lame duck candidates who are looking for their next jobs. Political office is a job, and it is good to have good, experienced people doing these jobs, but the folks who are doing a sh*tty job, definitely need to get voted out of office. The nature of our political system is that each politician can get voted out of office every 2 years (House) or 6 years (Senate). The fact that people are re-elected over and over again is the fault of the people who keep re-electing them.
|
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 10:44 |
|
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 10:47 |
interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:03 |
Regarding term limits we are talking about moderate terms like 6-8 years or so . If an intelligent politician (and we are assuming they have some political experience to begin with on some level) can't figure out their job in a couple of years then he or she probably doesn't belong there to begin with imho. Being in there any longer breeds complacency, corruption , and contempt. These Federal , State, and other political jobs have become careers to the extent that people want them to gain power and wealth and not for any public cause. When it comes to president I don't really trust anyone who actually wants the job...that's more about ego imo, and not a sign of someone who is going to do the right thing in many cases.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:07 |
timothy leary wrote:
interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.
|
That is always the catch isn't it. I have no ability to vote for or against John Boner or Paul Ryan, and yet most everything that happens in our government must run through them (formerly Boner)...and of course on the other side I have no ability to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed but I am stuck with them too.
There is so much division in the US, we have kind of reached that point where we really should split into two or more countries with the blue states forming one country and the red states forming the other. The sad part is, if that were to happen, it would only be a matter of time before these two new countries went to war with each other over their ideological differences.
|
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:14 |
The email server investigation is ongoing (I don't expect her to be indicted), and a possible conflict of interest investigation when it came to Clinton Foundation donations is ongoing, as well as possible misuse of charitable funds. Certainly there is political motivation and collusion when it comes to such investigations. |
There are always politics involved when these things happen and since Democrats are in charge right now it's unlikely they will indict her, but the better question is why would someone as smart as Hilary Clinton even take the risk of getting using a 'private server' knowing it was against the rules for government officials in her area? I'm not endorsing any of the GOP since I have pretty much always been a Dem but is she someone you want to vote for knowing she did this and then tried to cover it up? Is she the best we have to vote for? That's a sad comment imho.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13099
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:17 |
rushfan4 wrote:
timothy leary wrote:
interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.
|
That is always the catch isn't it. I have no ability to vote for or against John Boner or Paul Ryan, and yet most everything that happens in our government must run through them (formerly Boner)...and of course on the other side I have no ability to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed but I am stuck with them too.
There is so much division in the US, we have kind of reached that point where we really should split into two or more countries with the blue states forming one country and the red states forming the other. The sad part is, if that were to happen, it would only be a matter of time before these two new countries went to war with each other over their ideological differences. |
It would be an interesting battle with no money to spend on combat, with the blue country handing out everything in entitlements and the red country having eliminated taxes on the people who can actually afford to pay taxes.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:22 |
dr wu23 wrote:
Regarding term limits we are talking about moderate terms like 6-8 years or so . If an intelligent politician (and we are assuming they have some political experience to begin with on some level) can't figure out their job in a couple of years then he or she probably doesn't belong there to begin with imho.Being in there any longer breeds complacency, corruption , and contempt. These Federal , State, and other political jobs have become careers to the extent that people want them to gain power and wealth and not for any public cause. When it comes to president I don't really trust anyone who actually wants the job...that's more about ego imo, and not a sign of someone who is going to do the right thing in many cases. |
Honestly, I don't think it really matters. I think that we are screwed by out politicians either way. Michigan has the strictest term limits in the country. I have spoken with political analysts that have said that the term limits are actually bad for our state because of the turnover and the points that I described in my previous post. You spend your first term learning the ropes and then in your 2nd term you have the power to do something because the 2nd term people were termed out the last time...but you are a lame duck politician so you are either passing laws to benefit your next employer or you are spending your term running for your next political office. I definitely see both sides of the coin. It is a shame that when you have an honest, good person doing the job they have to lose their job because of term limits and pass it on to who knows who.
Depending on your point of view, term limits are what are getting us into this mess with our next president. Honestly, if I had my druthers between another term of President Obama and any of the other candidates out there, I'd prefer President Obama. Maybe its a good thing or maybe its a bad thing but basically right now, being a lame duck president, he is about as ineffective as he has ever been...but given that he and Congress have refused to work with each other for the last 5 years, what is another year.
|
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:26 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
rushfan4 wrote:
timothy leary wrote:
interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.
|
That is always the catch isn't it. I have no ability to vote for or against John Boner or Paul Ryan, and yet most everything that happens in our government must run through them (formerly Boner)...and of course on the other side I have no ability to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed but I am stuck with them too.
There is so much division in the US, we have kind of reached that point where we really should split into two or more countries with the blue states forming one country and the red states forming the other. The sad part is, if that were to happen, it would only be a matter of time before these two new countries went to war with each other over their ideological differences. |
It would be an interesting battle with no money to spend on combat, with the blue country handing out everything in entitlements and the red country having eliminated taxes on the people who can actually afford to pay taxes. |
Actually, I figured that it would be a really quick battle with the Red Country spending all of their tax dollars on military and the Blue Country spending all of theirs on handouts, the Red Country should win that battle pretty easily. But you could be right, that the Red Country wouldn't have any money to spend on the military since they wouldn't be collecting any taxes.
Edited by rushfan4 - February 28 2016 at 11:27
|
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:31 |
The war has already begun
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.