Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - American Politics the 2016 edition
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAmerican Politics the 2016 edition

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 146>
Author
Message
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:13
^ agreed. Just more political games being played by Congress
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:48
Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. 
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:57
Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. 
 
 
Absolutely....it was time for this years ago. And term limits on Supreme Court judges also. None of these people need to be in there for life.
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 18:59
John Mc Cain can go get a real job

Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 36333
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 19:08
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

^ Oh I don't see any email investigation going anywhere or having much weight if it did.   It's largely what she keeps saying it is: trumped up politikal nonsense that any gov official could potentially face.   Have you looked at the evidence in question; as far as I can tell it's all declassified if sensitive stuff that others had access to and adds up to about zero.    But as you say, we'll see.


The email server investigation is ongoing (I don't expect her to be indicted), and a possible conflict of interest investigation when it came to Clinton Foundation donations is ongoing, as well as possible misuse of charitable funds. Certainly there is political motivation and collusion when it comes to such investigations.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 20974
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 19:35
Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

John Mc Cain can go get a real job


The rubber chicken circuit?
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 27 2016 at 21:24
sounds about right
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 02:46
Originally posted by dr wu23 dr wu23 wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. 
 
 
Absolutely....it was time for this years ago. And term limits on Supreme Court judges also. None of these people need to be in there for life.

oh, but we need them senile in the Supreme Court so that they will nod every bill through


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 08:53
I think it is Congress that approves bills
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13721
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 09:01
Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

I think it is Congress that approves bills


As a Limey on the outside, that is what I thought as well
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 10:40
Originally posted by dr wu23 dr wu23 wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

Term limits for Congress. Some have been in there 30 years. 
 
 
Absolutely....it was time for this years ago. And term limits on Supreme Court judges also. None of these people need to be in there for life.
Not that I entirely disagree, but the trouble with term limits is that by the time the elected officials figure out their jobs and gain power/respect in their respective chambers, they are on their way out because they are termed out.  You end up with a bunch of idealists with no experience.  You also end up with a lot of lame duck candidates who are looking for their next jobs.  Political office is a job, and it is good to have good, experienced people doing these jobs, but the folks who are doing a sh*tty job, definitely need to get voted out of office.  The nature of our political system is that each politician can get voted out of office every 2 years (House) or 6 years (Senate).  The fact that people are re-elected over and over again is the fault of the people who keep re-electing them.
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 10:44
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

I think it is Congress that approves bills


As a Limey on the outside, that is what I thought as well
Correct.  Congress approves the bills.  The Supreme Court doesn't make law, they just interpret the law that Congress has written and the President has signed off on.  However, as discussed previously, the Court judges have been know to interpret the Constitution to make the law in favor of whichever political parties' point of view they side on, which in effect does create law, despite what they say. 
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 10:47
interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.

Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:03
Regarding term limits we are talking about moderate terms like 6-8 years or so . If an intelligent politician (and we are assuming they have some political experience to begin with on some level) can't figure out their job in a couple of years then he or she probably doesn't belong there to begin with imho.
Being in there any longer breeds complacency, corruption , and contempt.
These Federal , State, and other political jobs have become careers to the extent that people want them to gain power and wealth and not for any public cause.
When it comes to president I don't really trust anyone who actually wants the job...that's more about ego imo, and not a sign of someone who is going to do the right thing in many cases.
 
 
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:07
Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.

That is always the catch isn't it.  I have no ability to vote for or against John Boner or Paul Ryan, and yet most everything that happens in our government must run through them (formerly Boner)...and of course on the other side I have no ability to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed but I am stuck with them too. 

There is so much division in the US, we have kind of reached that point where we really should split into two or more countries with the blue states forming one country and the red states forming the other.  The sad part is, if that were to happen, it would only be a matter of time before these two new countries went to war with each other over their ideological differences.
Back to Top
dr wu23 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:14
Quote
The email server investigation is ongoing (I don't expect her to be indicted), and a possible conflict of interest investigation when it came to Clinton Foundation donations is ongoing, as well as possible misuse of charitable funds. Certainly there is political motivation and collusion when it comes to such investigations.
 
There are always politics involved when these things happen and since Democrats are in charge right now it's unlikely they will indict her,  but the better question is why would someone as smart as Hilary Clinton even take the risk of getting using a  'private server' knowing it was against the rules for government officials in her area?  I'm not endorsing any of the GOP since I have pretty much always been a Dem but is she someone you want to vote for knowing she did this and then tried to cover it up? Is she the best we have to vote for? That's a sad comment imho.
Confused
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone.
Haquin
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13099
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:17
Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.

That is always the catch isn't it.  I have no ability to vote for or against John Boner or Paul Ryan, and yet most everything that happens in our government must run through them (formerly Boner)...and of course on the other side I have no ability to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed but I am stuck with them too. 

There is so much division in the US, we have kind of reached that point where we really should split into two or more countries with the blue states forming one country and the red states forming the other.  The sad part is, if that were to happen, it would only be a matter of time before these two new countries went to war with each other over their ideological differences.
It would be an interesting battle with no money to spend on combat, with the blue country handing out everything in entitlements and the red country having eliminated taxes on the people who can actually afford to pay taxes.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:22
Originally posted by dr wu23 dr wu23 wrote:

Regarding term limits we are talking about moderate terms like 6-8 years or so . If an intelligent politician (and we are assuming they have some political experience to begin with on some level) can't figure out their job in a couple of years then he or she probably doesn't belong there to begin with imho.
Being in there any longer breeds complacency, corruption , and contempt.
These Federal , State, and other political jobs have become careers to the extent that people want them to gain power and wealth and not for any public cause.
When it comes to president I don't really trust anyone who actually wants the job...that's more about ego imo, and not a sign of someone who is going to do the right thing in many cases.
 
 
Honestly, I don't think it really matters.  I think that we are screwed by out politicians either way.  Michigan has the strictest term limits in the country.  I have spoken with political analysts that have said that the term limits are actually bad for our state because of the turnover and the points that I described in my previous post.  You spend your first term learning the ropes and then in your 2nd term you have the power to do something because the 2nd term people were termed out the last time...but you are a lame duck politician so you are either passing laws to benefit your next employer or you are spending your term running for your next political office.  I definitely see both sides of the coin.  It is a shame that when you have an honest, good person doing the job they have to lose their job because of term limits and pass it on to who knows who.  

Depending on your point of view, term limits are what are getting us into this mess with our next president.  Honestly, if I had my druthers between another term of President Obama and any of the other candidates out there, I'd prefer President Obama.   Maybe its a good thing or maybe its a bad thing but basically right now, being a lame duck president, he is about as ineffective as he has ever been...but given that he and Congress have refused to work with each other for the last 5 years, what is another year. 
Back to Top
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:26
Originally posted by The Dark Elf The Dark Elf wrote:

Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

Originally posted by timothy leary timothy leary wrote:

interesting post^ I think I might prefer idealists with no experience over some of the old lifers who control the present Congress. I do see your point but because the voters in Arizona elect someone the whole country is stuck with it. That is just an example. I figure lobbyists and corporations are actually the handlers of these guys anyway.

That is always the catch isn't it.  I have no ability to vote for or against John Boner or Paul Ryan, and yet most everything that happens in our government must run through them (formerly Boner)...and of course on the other side I have no ability to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reed but I am stuck with them too. 

There is so much division in the US, we have kind of reached that point where we really should split into two or more countries with the blue states forming one country and the red states forming the other.  The sad part is, if that were to happen, it would only be a matter of time before these two new countries went to war with each other over their ideological differences.
It would be an interesting battle with no money to spend on combat, with the blue country handing out everything in entitlements and the red country having eliminated taxes on the people who can actually afford to pay taxes.
Actually, I figured that it would be a really quick battle with the Red Country spending all of their tax dollars on military and the Blue Country spending all of theirs on handouts, the Red Country should win that battle pretty easily.  But you could be right, that the Red Country wouldn't have any money to spend on the military since they wouldn't be collecting any taxes.  LOL

Edited by rushfan4 - February 28 2016 at 11:27
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 28 2016 at 11:31
The war has already begun
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 146>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.294 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.