Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: June 09 2016 at 14:25 |
On a related note, the Italian Minister of Economy, Pier Carlo Padoan, has had some strong words about Trump and the possibility of his election - stating that it would be a shock for financial markets and cause some more long-term instability.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: June 09 2016 at 21:27 |
Raff wrote:
On a related note, the Italian Minister of Economy, Pier Carlo Padoan, has had some strong words about Trump and the possibility of his election - stating that it would be a shock for financial markets and cause some more long-term instability.
|
As it is, stock markets are overvalued because really low interest rates have driven a lot of bad money to equity. So an event like Trump becoming Prez of US could be just the perfect trigger for a perfect storm scenario. People are downplaying its impact now, but then they also downplayed the meltdown until it happened.
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 10 2016 at 02:07 |
The T wrote:
Just now Sanders, after meeting with Obama, said he will do everything in his power to stop Trump from becoming president. His whole speech sounded like that of someone who will continue pushing his agenda but who also know it's time to start moving on and focus on stopping real danger from becoming reality. I'm glad about this. |
Amazing, I was just telling you guys he's starting to wind things down and I think final result will be Clinton endorsement/rallying behind her.
Seriously, everyone needed to calm down He never was gunna try to execute his "plan" and he knew he lost. It was, I thought, pretty obvious he was staying in solely to keep the message going and to keep exerting pressure on the party. That's all it was. Was never gunna nuke the party, despite us all being bludgeoned with that, and he's even turned down Jill Stein's offers to run under the Green Party, even though that'd be a damn powerful movement.
Indeed, everyone has said all the the right things. Obama, Clinton, Reid and Pelosi all praised Sanders and his campaign, I believe Clinton and co said they wont directly tell him to drop out, he said he'll work with her and is 100% dedicated to stopping Trump. All the right things. It's the beginning of the end here for this primary.
Edited by JJLehto - June 10 2016 at 02:16
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 10 2016 at 02:22 |
rogerthat wrote:
Raff wrote:
On a related note, the Italian Minister of Economy, Pier Carlo Padoan, has had some strong words about Trump and the possibility of his election - stating that it would be a shock for financial markets and cause some more long-term instability.
|
As it is, stock markets are overvalued because really low interest rates have driven a lot of bad money to equity. So an event like Trump becoming Prez of US could be just the perfect trigger for a perfect storm scenario. People are downplaying its impact now, but then they also downplayed the meltdown until it happened. |
Yeah, the stock bubble is going to burst inevitably anyway, Trump's...style...could certainly be the pin that pops it. Though I think it's realistic to say the next downturn is happening soon, maybe later this year, maybe early 2017 but within a a year perhaps? This is not discussed at all, (partly because no one wants to be the one predicting recession) but it's gunna happen, and it played a huge role in 2008. If it happens before November, it'll be the issue of the election and could throw everything out the window.
We all know there's two Trumps, the fake one who's running a reality TV show for President, and the real one. I really hope the real starts to emerge soon. We can't just assume he has no shot, especially if the economy goes south. He needs to start assuring the world he isn't this unstable nuclear reactor
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: June 10 2016 at 15:56 |
Let's see if Warren has as much intelligence as I credit her with... that VP job is an absolute black hole job in a Clinton v.2 administration. Stay in the Senate. Rule there... if in real power if not in name (Schumer would get Majority Leader IIRC).
Set the table for the next open election....
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: June 10 2016 at 16:15 |
well... let's see if I do better here than with my NHL prediction though this one is like shooting fish in a barrel. The official WAY TOO EARLY McPrediction. Hillary haters will hate... she'll top out around 45% minority haters, misogynists, and bigots will hate... Trump will get the hard core racists bigots and irresponsible voters that blame everyone but the people THEY put into power in Congress for the lack of anything being done. Make America Great Again.....yeah...well then vote out a Republican Trump gets 40% The Libritarians take the wacky kids and drain establishment GOP votes who feign repulsion at Trump. For merely dropping the attempt to be circumspect that has been page 1 of the GOP ESTABLISHMENT playbook for 20 years... and directly and without political double speak..appealing to bigots and backwards thinkers. Liberatarians take 15% of the vote. The result. The biggest electoral landslide seen since 1984. Hillary obviously takes all blue states. Blue leaning. Takes all battleground and steals a few states beginning the slide from red leaning to battleground (N.C, Arizone, perhaps even Georgia). Can't really see much changing that electoral math. Now that Bernie has got it through his thick head he lost and only loses more by continuing or worse going 3rd party. Other than Trump doing a complete 180. I don't think he is capable of it... and I don't think the political wizardly of Clinton would let the American public be fooled or forget what he has said.
Edited by micky - June 10 2016 at 16:19
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
emigre80
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 25 2015
Location: kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 2223
|
Posted: June 10 2016 at 18:34 |
micky wrote:
well... let's see if I do better here than with my NHL prediction
though this one is like shooting fish in a barrel.
The official WAY TOO EARLY McPrediction.
Hillary haters will hate... she'll top out around 45% minority haters, misogynists, and bigots will hate... Trump will get the hard core racists bigots and irresponsible voters that blame everyone but the people THEY put into power in Congress for the lack of anything being done. Make America Great Again.....yeah...well then vote out a Republican
Trump gets 40%
The Libritarians take the wacky kids and drain establishment GOP votes who feign repulsion at Trump. For merely dropping the attempt to be circumspect that has been page 1 of the GOP ESTABLISHMENT playbook for 20 years... and directly and without political double speak..appealing to bigots and backwards thinkers.
Liberatarians take 15% of the vote.
The result. The biggest electoral landslide seen since 1984. Hillary obviously takes all blue states. Blue leaning. Takes all battleground and steals a few states beginning the slide from red leaning to battleground (N.C, Arizone, perhaps even Georgia).
Can't really see much changing that electoral math. Now that Bernie has got it through his thick head he lost and only loses more by continuing or worse going 3rd party.
Other than Trump doing a complete 180. I don't think he is capable of it... and I don't think the political wizardly of Clinton would let the American public be fooled or forget what he has said.
|
it's a fairly plausible scenario, particularly when you consider the Trump campaign seems to be broke, he's not going to put any money into it (if he even has the money) and refuses to staff his campaign or do any organizing. He's going up against a very solid and well organized campaign, with lots of outreach. Plus Clinton has Obama, Warren, Biden and Clinton I in her corner. It could be a rout. It will be a long five months for those of us who remember the Democratic capacity for shooting ourselves in the foot. You can never rule it out.
|
|
LearsFool
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 09 2014
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 8642
|
Posted: June 10 2016 at 20:12 |
It goes beyond that. Remember when I brought up how Trump apparently thinks he can flip several solidly blue states? It's true. What little resources he has - and he's counting on state Republicans to do all the heavy lifting - is going to political bridges to nowhere. In my neck of the woods, he's convinced the baseball bat swinging omnibigot Carl Paladino that New York can go to the GOP on the strength of the long suffering upstate vote. Reality check: if the upstate vote was enough to carry the state, Paladino would be governor right now.
Here's a real stretch prediction: Utah is carried by Hillary or maybe even Gary Johnson (Libertarian). That's based off a single, recent poll, but that such a happenstance appears on the cards at all tells you just how bad Trump is and how off the rails this whole campaign season is.
Trump needs to keep the at risk Red Wall states. If he doesn't, it doesn't matter how well he does in the Rust Belt, his only shot by both his nature and his own design. In such a case, he could carry two of three from Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania and yet still lose. That's not supposed to happen - it's a long-standing political rule of thumb that you have to win big in that combo.
These are interesting times.
|
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 00:52 |
Trump is very charismatic on tv shows, been there for many seasons this is why many people think they connect with him and know him. If you are loyal to him he will treat you well too but if you disagree with him no matter what he will attack you and try to belittle you. He is not necessary a racist like David Duke etc, he is a bigot, a fraud, a narcissist, lacking empathy, is an authoritarian, sexist too but you don't have to have a different skin of colour for him to think less of you, he will treat you right if you are his minion, otherwise thinks that of every single person is beneath him. Also he lies so much however the media for ratings will broadcast it without question, thus lets him get away with everything.
Edited by Kati - June 11 2016 at 00:53
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65361
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 00:53 |
^^ you win Phrase of the Day for "baseball bat swinging omnibigot".
Edited by Atavachron - June 11 2016 at 00:53
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65361
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 01:00 |
Anyone catch Meryl Streep's Trump? --
Pretty awesome
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 01:40 |
She is the ultimate actress and wins everything lolol Btw, here is the sequel to Clockwork Orange
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 02:30 |
Speaking of Clinton's VP. Earlier I mentioned the names thrown around alot, but there's some I forgot: Martin O Malley. He now has a lot more name recognition and basically spent his entire campaign setting himself up as the bridge between Sanders and Clinton. He did pretty darn well in the debates. He is not currently an elected official, so he could be used without losing any seats.
Besides the fact I want Warren in the senate to keep staying useful, it also dawned on me the Dems really need every seat they can get. Maybe not wise to pull a Senator out, especially more liberal ones. This would knock off many of the names I see thrown around as potentials: Sherrod Brown, Tim Kaine, Mark Warner, Cory Booker, Chris Murphy. I'm a big fan of Brown and Murphy but yeah maybe best to keep them in the senate.
O Malley could be a good move for her. Another name I've heard is Tom Perez, current Sect of Labor. He recently presided over the new OT rule, and he seems to have a pretty solid liberal/pro labor record. He also would not "cost" them anything in terms of losing a Senate seat.
Agreed with Warren. At first I wanted her as VP, but as I thought about that is absolutely right...VP is dead end. Also too much uncertainty. Deff best to stay in the Senate and push the progressive agenda, build the case for her Presidency that way. There's also hopeful news on the horizon about Congress. Russ Fiengold of Wisconsin is a personal hero of mine and great dude, he's expected to win his seat back. Would be a great progressive (re)addition.
Kamala Harris is, for the moment, the frontrunner for the Senate seat in California. Another progressive who is going to face another Democrat in the election...more moderate Loretta Sanchez. Kind of a fascinating microcosm. Alan Grayson is still in the primary race but he's running for Senate in FL and is someone else I'd love to see get elevated. I'm hoping there's more to come.
Oh, guess we can also discuss Trump's VP picks. It's a lot more boring to me...he's gunna pick a mainstreamer, probably one of the people he ran against, and honestly I can see him just giving it to whoever kisses his ass the hardest. Christie has an edge I think due to being the first to jump on his bandwagon.
Edited by JJLehto - June 11 2016 at 02:32
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 02:58 |
BTW Bernie isn't going 3rd party and never was, yeeeesh
I think Clinton will win the election basically along 2012 lines. All the standard blue states, obviously, and some combo of most of the swing states. Iowa, Virginia, Florida, Ohio, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada. Maybe not all, but yeah it'll be somewhere along those lines. A solid victory, certainly no massive 1964, 72 or 84 esque blowout, and it'll even be lesser than what Bill managed. Still very very solid.
I'm not saying this is right, in fact it's not, but the reason so many will back Clinton to stop Trump can be said on the other side...the hatred of Clinton, irrational as it is, is very very intense. Pains me to say but I know people personally that are voting Trump solely to have it not be Hillary. They don't even seem to care what he says, just simply he aint Clinton. Also we can't ignore the unfortunate truth many people do, to varying degrees, like what he says. I do believe Trump will win all the standard red states. Perhaps he sneaks in Ohio or Nevada but even if so, won't be an issue.
Only except is Gary Johnson playing spoiler. It's true if he can draw good in some red states, then it could tip the scales massively towards Clinton but my faith is low Sure, Trump refusers say they're looking to Johnson but most will stay home, just all the Bernie supporters people are worried about (well I think many will back Clinton in the end) but they will also stay home. I would love for a third party candidate to break the double digit mark but I just have little faith in people having the nerve to do so, especially in an election like this where many on the right do truly despise Clinton.
It's a shame if there's ever an election for third parties to shine, libertarian and green mainly, it's this one where majorities hate both candidates but sadly for that very reason they'll dig in deeper and back one or the other.
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 03:07 |
I discussed this with some people on Facebook, third parties will never flourish in the US as long as they are a "spoiler". I had hope early on that this election could become a 4 way battle, with upset conservatives and liberals flocking to Gary Johnson and Jill Stein. Would greatly dampen the spoiler effect since it'd happen on both sides and what a great moment it'd be if multiple third party candidates could crack double digits, which in theory is possible. In reality though I realized there's no hope Can't risk Trump or Clinton in the end. God, what if Gary did manage 15%? Even 10% would be enough to tip some states over to Clinton. He'd be the new Nader, and cause damage to the very idea of third parties.
The only way, as is, a third party candidate can break this is to be a legitimate candidate from the start, and draw from both sides. Only person I can think of managing this anytime recently is Ross Perot. Trump has kind of hit on something honestly, he does have some moderate appeal (well on the right) and has given a voice to the white working class bloc economically (even though he's full of sh*t and has used racism) If there was a more moderate, way toned down, not racist baiting Trump they could really hit on something.
Edited by JJLehto - June 11 2016 at 03:18
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 03:18 |
^ In first-past-the-post voting third parties can never succeed in doing anything of value other than proving that it's a two-party system. They can attract a significantly large percentage of the vote (in theory as much as 49.999% if they come second in every red state and every blue state) but because they are the alternative loser and never the alternative winner they will always be in overall third place.
|
What?
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 03:24 |
Oh I am all for proportional representation, always have been, but that's for a different rant
To be fair, it's technically possible, there have been third party candidates who won states in US elections. Off the top of my head George Wallace did in 1968. There's nothing stopping one from taking first place in a state, just it's extremely rare. Oh and Wallace was no threat to the national race since he ran as a segregationist.
Like I said, the only way a third party candidate could find national success, as is, would be if they were a legitimate force from the start. Someone like a Ross Perot who was never tethered to either party, a true wild card that also appealed to both sides. This is of course extremely rare, and also requires weaker candidates.
Bush Sr/Bill, Bush Jr/Gore, now Trump/Clinton. No surprise people are more willing to look for a third option in cases like these. Problem is, as we said, they can only spoil. Would need a true third force that grabs voters from both sides, or massive reform to how the system works.
Edited by JJLehto - June 11 2016 at 03:31
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 06:34 |
emigre80 wrote:
micky wrote:
well... let's see if I do better here than with my NHL prediction
though this one is like shooting fish in a barrel.
The official WAY TOO EARLY McPrediction.
Hillary haters will hate... she'll top out around 45% minority haters, misogynists, and bigots will hate... Trump will get the hard core racists bigots and irresponsible voters that blame everyone but the people THEY put into power in Congress for the lack of anything being done. Make America Great Again.....yeah...well then vote out a Republican
Trump gets 40%
The Libritarians take the wacky kids and drain establishment GOP votes who feign repulsion at Trump. For merely dropping the attempt to be circumspect that has been page 1 of the GOP ESTABLISHMENT playbook for 20 years... and directly and without political double speak..appealing to bigots and backwards thinkers.
Liberatarians take 15% of the vote.
The result. The biggest electoral landslide seen since 1984. Hillary obviously takes all blue states. Blue leaning. Takes all battleground and steals a few states beginning the slide from red leaning to battleground (N.C, Arizone, perhaps even Georgia).
Can't really see much changing that electoral math. Now that Bernie has got it through his thick head he lost and only loses more by continuing or worse going 3rd party.
Other than Trump doing a complete 180. I don't think he is capable of it... and I don't think the political wizardly of Clinton would let the American public be fooled or forget what he has said.
|
it's a fairly plausible scenario, particularly when you consider the Trump campaign seems to be broke, he's not going to put any money into it (if he even has the money) and refuses to staff his campaign or do any organizing. He's going up against a very solid and well organized campaign, with lots of outreach. Plus Clinton has Obama, Warren, Biden and Clinton I in her corner. It could be a rout. It will be a long five months for those of us who remember the Democratic capacity for shooting ourselves in the foot. You can never rule it out. |
yep... the electoral math already favored HIllary.. if Trump had to defend Red states.. it is game over and it looks pretty easy to see he is going to have to. Yeah... Trump's VP choice will be interesting.. in that who in their right mind would accept it. Talk about the political equivalent of putting a loaded gun in your mouth and pulling the trigger. Political career suicide. Thus I tend to think no national political figure would touch it. Which means he may to go with someone outside of the box.... Perhaps he can go with David Duke....
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 06:41 |
JJLehto wrote:
rogerthat wrote:
Raff wrote:
On a related note, the Italian Minister of Economy, Pier Carlo Padoan, has had some strong words about Trump and the possibility of his election - stating that it would be a shock for financial markets and cause some more long-term instability.
|
As it is, stock markets are overvalued because really low interest rates have driven a lot of bad money to equity. So an event like Trump becoming Prez of US could be just the perfect trigger for a perfect storm scenario. People are downplaying its impact now, but then they also downplayed the meltdown until it happened. |
Yeah, the stock bubble is going to burst inevitably anyway, Trump's...style...could certainly be the pin that pops it. Though I think it's realistic to say the next downturn is happening soon, maybe later this year, maybe early 2017 but within a a year perhaps? This is not discussed at all, (partly because no one wants to be the one predicting recession) but it's gunna happen, and it played a huge role in 2008. If it happens before November, it'll be the issue of the election and could throw everything out the window.
We all know there's two Trumps, the fake one who's running a reality TV show for President, and the real one. I really hope the real starts to emerge soon. We can't just assume he has no shot, especially if the economy goes south. He needs to start assuring the world he isn't this unstable nuclear reactor
|
Methinks Yellen developed cold feet a bit too soon for the bubble to pop this year so we're gonna have a bigger bang sometime later. Somebody mad enough to go on an interest rate hiking spree like Fed did from 2005 to 2007 which was what tightened the screws and eventually busted the bubble. Of course, nobody knows EXACTLY what's going on in China so if China suddenly suffers a big crash, the contagion could spread to the US and other stock markets.
|
|
Kati
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 10 2010
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Points: 6253
|
Posted: June 11 2016 at 07:01 |
This whole week I have been trying to explain facts from lies etc. Today I need a break really :) This video is so funny, makes me smile and laugh. Micky this is for you Freddie Starr | Mick Jagger Impression | 1970 Royal Variety Performance
|
|