Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Marty McFly
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
|
Posted: January 23 2010 at 13:16 |
I never heard about them till I get here. But that's not my, nor their fault I suppose.
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my
|
|
Thyme Traveler
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 12 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 164
|
Posted: January 23 2010 at 23:00 |
When they were good, they were very very good; when they were bad... Love Beach.
Without disrespecting one of Prog's most revered and influential groups (and I do count myself as a fan), my thoughts are this...
Some of the greatest bands in Prog (Pink Floyd, Yes, Camel, and especially Genesis) were much greater than the sum of their parts. With ELP, I never got that feeling. ELP was never ELP > E + L + P, but always ELP = E + L + P.
|
Fire up the flux capacitor ! We're taking this Delorean through all four dimensions.
What is the future of prog ? Genesis reunion ? I'm not telling!That could upset the thyme/space continuum.
|
|
Thyme Traveler
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 12 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 164
|
Posted: January 23 2010 at 23:02 |
Thyme Traveler wrote:
When they were good, they were very very good; when they were bad... Love Beach.
Without disrespecting one of Prog's most revered and influential groups (and I do count myself as a fan), my thoughts are this...
Some of the greatest bands in Prog (Pink Floyd, Yes, Camel, and especially Genesis) were much greater than the sum of their parts. With ELP, I never got that feeling. ELP was never ELP > E + L + P, but always ELP = E + L + P.
|
Actually in some cases (Works, Love Beach, and especially the retched In the Hot Seat) ELP was much less than E + L + P
|
Fire up the flux capacitor ! We're taking this Delorean through all four dimensions.
What is the future of prog ? Genesis reunion ? I'm not telling!That could upset the thyme/space continuum.
|
|
PROGMONSTER2008
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 610
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 00:27 |
ELP were cool from 1971-1973. After that they lost the plot. Emerson was too much of a show pony too. They wouldn't make my top 10 prog bands of the 70s because they only have 3 studio albums I really enjoy
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 11:19 |
Atavachron wrote:
^ said like someone who really knows a band (you sound like me talkin about Zep )
|
funny... I thought of you and your post this morning when Raff picked out LZ III and we listened to it. Lord knows I've heard the album a 1000 times, but so much so I hadn't listened to it in years, you sort of sink into the 'familiarity breeds contempt' routine. To where LZ offhandedly can be written off as 'hype' or style or substance... yet when you really listen... you recognize the brilliance of it. not to say ELP suffers that same kind of treatment... some people just hate that group. But again... that speaks volumes to me as to their import. As I noted once in my TFTO review.... prog is simply the merging of music and art... as with any work of art.. some will love it.. some will hate it. The more avant the nature of the work of art... the more passionate the feeling on either side. That is why ELP is the eptimome of prog.. they didn't play it safe.. make simple inoffensive GENERIC 'prog' that your grandmother can listen to... *cough... Camel*.. at least until she dozes off. ELP was high art that pushed peoples buttons. and exploded existing notions of what you could.. or should do with music... and keyboards especially.. and since keyboards and their use is one of HALLMARKS of prog. It is really silly to argue that their was really any more important group in prog than ELP.
Edited by micky - January 24 2010 at 11:21
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 11:28 |
To add to my hubby's already wonderful post , I'd like to remind people that high art can often be offensive to the so-called 'masses', or at the very least misunderstood by them. Nowadays, Ravel's "Bolero" is unanimously considered a masterpiece of classical music, but, when it was first performed (Paris, 1928), it seems a woman shouted, "he's mad!" - to which the composer replied that she had really understood the piece.
|
|
Marty McFly
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 13:20 |
Seems like I'm lacking something here by not knowing them, huh ? Are they something like basic need for every progster then ? Are they the soil on which others should grow ? Are they the dish on which we can lay or food, as opposite to eat raw meat from bare floor ?
Just say the word.
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my
|
|
Garion81
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 13:35 |
Agree with both of you M & R. ELP did more to push the envelope in the early 70's than any other group. The obvious of course was the synthesizer but more important making Keyboard a lead instrument. Bringing classical music to an audience never exposed to it but more important was the Gershwin, Bernstien, the jazz and the honky tonk styles also never exposed. They brought the one side of album epic that was more than just big jam (Who do You Love, In-A-Gadda_Da-Vida). An expertly composed theme with concept that incorporated multiple time changes, symphonic layering and new instrumentation.
To this, then 17 year old taking piano lessons, watching them on the BSS tour it totally changed what I thought music was and how all styles can be incorporated. It erased the this is this and this is that lines I had drawn in my head.
It is unfortunate that they lost momentum after 1974 but those albums in those years more than cemented their importance. Even still with the exception of The Hot Seat (did not originally come with the studio Pictures. That was actually released on the earlier Return of The Manticore Box set) I can find something good on every LP.
Oh one last thought about those years 70-74. They never lost site of the fact they were having fun and that they played rock and roll.
Edited by Garion81 - January 24 2010 at 13:40
|
"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 13:53 |
Garion81 wrote:
Agree with both of you M & R. ELP did more to push the envelope in the early 70's than any other group. The obvious of course was the synthesizer but more important making Keyboard a lead instrument. Bringing classical music to an audience never exposed to it but more important was the Gershwin, Bernstien, the jazz and the honky tonk styles also never exposed. They brought the one side of album epic that was more than just big jam (Who do You Love, In-A-Gadda_Da-Vida). An expertly composed theme with concept that incorporated multiple time changes, symphonic layering and new instrumentation.
To this, then 17 year old taking piano lessons, watching them on the BSS tour it totally changed what I thought music was and how all styles can be incorporated. It erased the this is this and this is that lines I had drawn in my head.
It is unfortunate that they lost momentum after 1974 but those albums in those years more than cemented their importance. Even still with the exception of The Hot Seat (did not originally come with the studio Pictures. That was actually released on the earlier Return of The Manticore Box set) I can find something good on every LP.
Oh one last thought about those years 70-74. They never lost site of the fact they were having fun and that they played rock and roll. |
well said Brian
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: January 24 2010 at 20:36 |
Marty McFly wrote:
Seems like I'm lacking something here by not knowing them, huh ? Are they something like basic need for every progster then ? Are they the soil on which others should grow ? Are they the dish on which we can lay or food, as opposite to eat raw meat from bare floor ?
Just say the word. |
Well, you should know them, but that doesn't meen that you have to like them. I guess you can get quiet a good idea about what they are with this thread. For me, they have some very good moments and some very annoying moments (but then, that's true of most bands I like). Perhaps you should just hear them and make your own judgement.
|
|
Marty McFly
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
|
Posted: January 25 2010 at 02:33 |
Dellinger wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
Seems like I'm lacking something here by not knowing them, huh ? Are they something like basic need for every progster then ? Are they the soil on which others should grow ? Are they the dish on which we can lay or food, as opposite to eat raw meat from bare floor ?
Just say the word. |
Well, you should know them, but that doesn't meen that you have to like them. I guess you can get quiet a good idea about what they are with this thread. For me, they have some very good moments and some very annoying moments (but then, that's true of most bands I like). Perhaps you should just hear them and make your own judgement. |
It's true. Youtube will do. Anyway, it's annoying, how everyone's talking about them (NO, THIS ISN't ANNOYING) and I dont understand it at all (THIS IS). Don't misinterpret me please. I think I heard once Tarkus I suppose, but didn't hear its greatness, when compared to other classic bands I know. Let's try it again, hopefully it will not fade away.
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
|
Posted: January 25 2010 at 02:40 |
it may be that the Tark is best when heard early in one's prog journey, the magic captured forever
|
|
Pekka
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6442
|
Posted: January 25 2010 at 02:45 |
Atavachron wrote:
it may be that the Tark is best when heard early in one's prog journey, the magic captured forever
|
I first heard Tarkus very early in my prog journey and it scared me off ELP for a long time For a couple of years they were "that weird armadillo band" even though I did enjoy parts of Karn Evil 9 when I heard it soon after Tarkus.
|
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
|
Posted: January 25 2010 at 02:53 |
^ me too actually , but I heard it first at the age of about 9 (I liked that sci-fi cover!), so it wasn't till young adulthood that I realized how good it is
|
|
Marty McFly
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
|
Posted: January 25 2010 at 04:02 |
Atavachron wrote:
it may be that the Tark is best when heard early in one's prog journey, the magic captured forever
|
That's it. I'm 21 now, so this experience wouldn't be nostalgia, but instead - more intelligent and "suspicious" close look on what's good about their music and what is not. That's somehow sad. If I had a chance, I could love them more then I would be able now. There's no denying.
|
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless," -Andyman1125 on Lulu Even my
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: January 25 2010 at 21:59 |
Marty McFly wrote:
Dellinger wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
Seems like I'm lacking something here by not knowing them, huh ? Are they something like basic need for every progster then ? Are they the soil on which others should grow ? Are they the dish on which we can lay or food, as opposite to eat raw meat from bare floor ?
Just say the word. |
Well, you should know them, but that doesn't meen that you have to like them. I guess you can get quiet a good idea about what they are with this thread. For me, they have some very good moments and some very annoying moments (but then, that's true of most bands I like). Perhaps you should just hear them and make your own judgement. |
It's true. Youtube will do. Anyway, it's annoying, how everyone's talking about them (NO, THIS ISN't ANNOYING) and I dont understand it at all (THIS IS). Don't misinterpret me please. I think I heard once Tarkus I suppose, but didn't hear its greatness, when compared to other classic bands I know. Let's try it again, hopefully it will not fade away. |
You may already know that Prog usually requires repeated listening to unerstand what's going on and apreciate it, so you may just as well try again, and again, and again, until you are sure you do like them or not. I myself don't like many of their songs, and I don't like all of Tarkus, but some parts of it are uneniably amazing.
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: January 26 2010 at 04:08 |
Nothing wrong with bombast. Just means they know what they are doing and do it all brilliantly - in concert. Even though there's bits I can live without (half of Works 1 and Lake's solo material) - I actually think Works 2 works better. But they do not have too many truly great albums. Since BSS there have been none. Not for 36 years has there been anything more than fairly half hearted efforts. They might have done a 90125 Yes / mainstream Genesis thing... but they did not so ELP kind of fall off the edge there. \ But the studio albums... they need classics and I'm afraid that opportunity (which always knocked) passed them by.
It's not the axe hero thing either. Genesis - even with Hackett were
not a guitar god band and the mainstream Genesis were hugely successful
- no Hackett. ELP are and were a tremendous band, great musicians and some good related releases (their debut is unbelievably superb IMHO) but mainstream wise it's Karn Evil 9's radio extract and that's it for the mainstream. And for the devotee? Live albums (nearly as many as John Wetton) a-plenty. Some really good ones (and some dodgy disguised WBMFTTSTNE reissues),
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: January 26 2010 at 07:48 |
Atavachron wrote:
it may be that the Tark is best when heard early in one's prog journey, the magic captured forever
|
I don't know, I heard Karn Evil 9 first and got to Tarkus much later and maybe because of that I was able to appreciate that Tarkus is a better piece of composition (imo!). Great, great band though I tend to agree with those who said that they could have put out more great albums, I tend to recall great songs and moments instead. I think the guitar hero point is definitely valid and - to reignite an old debate - probably accounts for the increased following of Camel vis-a-vis ELP.
|
|
Garion81
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
|
Posted: January 26 2010 at 12:27 |
When listening to Tarkus keep in mind it was the first epic of its kind. It was released in 1971 way before Close to the Edge, Thick as Brick and Suppers Ready.
|
"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: January 26 2010 at 21:40 |
Atom Heart Mother was released in 1970.
|
|