Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The forum and the Big Muddy
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe forum and the Big Muddy

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2024 at 18:48
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

 
I think the issue here would be something that the Admins are, possibly, not doing ... and the part that makes things "dour" for me, is seeing many Admins actually participate in many of those discussions,  (...)
This looks as if you don't know who is admin and who isn't.

Hi,

I think these days you folks are much more careful than previously ... I, personally, do not care if any Admin participates or not, but I imagine that we would expect them to be some kind of traffic force, and hopefully things can work and no "accidents".

Again, the politics is not the issue for me ... the attitude is. And I think we need to make sure we know and understand that. ... and the other option is to remove the postings ... and make it clear to that person that the attitude is not appreciated, and is in the incorrect location for his/her posting.
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 14:57
Originally posted by Hrychu Hrychu wrote:

Quote All of the top albums in the "Progressive" history have some form of politics in it

Except for: Close to the Edge, Fragile, The Yes Album, The Snow Goose, Ommadawn, Romantic Warrior, Häxan, Mekanïk Destruktïw Kommandöh, Rock Bottom, In A Silent Way, A Drop of Light, Viljans Öga, Voyage of the Acolyte, Hamburger Concerto, Of Queues and Cures, K.A (Köhntarkösz Anteria)

And that's just the PA top 100. ;)

According to Edward Macan's Rocking the Classics, Yes wasn't directly political but they were very utopian, as they more than any other major Progressive Rock band stressed the belief that drawing of the wisdom of ages is the key to breaking out of our cycle of social strife and entering a new period of cosmic awareness; which is not least evident in for instance the suite Close to the Edge, and which also was hoped to convey the progress from gross materialism to spiritual awareness (1997, p. 80, 81).

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 15:37

^ Romantic Warrior wasn't either quite apolitical, which can be seen in this excerpt from a poem entitled "The Romantic Warrior", 
written by Neville Potter and included as a part of the album's artwork :

Pick up the gauntlet warriors
sheath your swords put up your trusty lance
channel the power used to crush every foe
into giving the future a chance

Believe in yourselves old warriors bold
create a path so firm and sure
fight for the birth of the freedom of man
the end of this medieval overture.


Edited by David_D - July 23 2024 at 15:45
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6343
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 16:06
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:


^ Romantic Warrior wasn't either quite apolitical, which can be seen in this excerpt from a poem entitled "The Romantic Warrior", 
written by Neville Potter and included as a part of the album's artwork :

Pick up the gauntlet warriors
sheath your swords put up your trusty lance
channel the power used to crush every foe
into giving the future a chance

Believe in yourselves old warriors bold
create a path so firm and sure
fight for the birth of the freedom of man
the end of this medieval overture.


What an inspiring poem!  It addresses my main concern.  I'm anti-war.  Let's build and not destroy.

Isaiah 2:4
"...they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore."Wink
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 16:24
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

I'm anti-war.  Let's build and not destroy.

Thumbs Up




Edited by David_D - July 23 2024 at 16:28
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 17:23
'Building' can be almost as fraught with hazards and peril as destroying is [America has often been accused of spreading their commercial culture throughout the world even though other countries have an actual history of imperialism and domination: Britain, Spain, Germany, Japan, ancient Greece and Rome, all far more invasive and plundering than the U.S. has ever been].   What will be built and why are the questions, not some vague, idealistic notion of being productive.   The poem quoted is nothing if not militaristic, full of warriors and creating firm paths.   It smacks of Crusaders old & new, and seems rather naive.   One must be careful, sensitive, and abstain from action if it will cause more harm than good.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6343
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 18:42
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

'Building' can be almost as fraught with hazards and peril as destroying is [America has often been accused of spreading their commercial culture throughout the world even though other countries have an actual history of imperialism and domination: Britain, Spain, Germany, Japan, ancient Greece and Rome, all far more invasive and plundering than the U.S. has ever been].   What will be built and why are the questions, not some vague, idealistic notion of being productive.   The poem quoted is nothing if not militaristic, full of warriors and creating firm paths.   It smacks of Crusaders old & new, and seems rather naive.   One must be careful, sensitive, and abstain from action if it will cause more harm than good.


Building can be planting trees and crops.  That's what I'm into.  On my property, I've planted 40 trees in the last four years...mostly magnolias.  Why not turn the warriors into farmers, doctors, nurses, and folks who fix/build homes? Wink

What is the second most important political policy that I care about? I want American tax money spent on America and Americans.  

I am totally against colonialism. Britain, Spain, Germany, Japan, ancient Greece and Rome were  possibly more invasive than America...but America has over 750 foreign military bases...and about a quarter of a million soldiers outside of America. Britain, Spain, Germany, Japan, ancient Greece, and Rome's invasiveness was THEN...America is NOW. 

What is the third most important political policy that I care about?  Illegal immigration.  I am not a member of any political party.  I vote according to which candidate harmonizes with my three top policy concerns.Wink  


Edited by omphaloskepsis - July 23 2024 at 18:45
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 5988
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 19:51
My suggestion of some sort of self-moderation by the thread-opener - to help the work of the two institutional moderators - seems not to have been considered by any forumist.

I'm afraid this thread hasn't changed the situation. 

Evidently most of the administrators are satisfied with the way the forum is going as it is and think it's best to limit the topics of discussion - this is beyond the fact that the moderators, Greg and Ian, cannot be omnipotent and follow every issue.

I go back to my studies on the 1970s: great ideals, desire to make revolution, even with armed struggle, feminism, wonderful music....

“everything is political,” many students used to say in those years - like now, in some Universities. 

Gian Mari Volontè, the greatest Italian actor ever, a leftist militant, after his first films with Sergio Leone acted only in socially or politically committed films, but when an interviewer asked him: Why do you act only in political films? He replied: Every film is political.

I still think so today.

Every art-work is political, because political is not only the content, but also the form. Just as every art-work  is autobiographical. Only some art-works are explicitly political or autobiographical, while others are implicitly, subterranean political - by denial.

The choice not to talk about politics is also a political choice, and in my opinion it is a political choice that goes hand in hand with the times we live in, and the politicians we have.

 


Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 20850
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 20:32
As long as you guys are talking about music I will leave this thread open. If it becomes a political discussion I'm closing it.


Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2024 at 21:36
^ But this was started as a political thread, not a music one.   And the O.P., though making an earnest effort to moderate it, cannot control others' input.   What is the topic other than how politics impact this site, and therefore that this thread is, by its nature, political ?   The discussion has been a civil & productive one, but not forever.   

On the one hand the O.P. insists politics should be allowed to be talked about and not over-moderated, and on the other he wants a thread that, in a roundabout way, discusses the very thing that has caused issues.   He can't have it both ways.   I suggest the thread stay open unless it turns cantankerous, which it likely will eventually.   As I said earlier, we live in politically charged times and that can't be avoided.   It's a hard call and Mods have been doing an excellent balancing act, and since we may be about to lose Greg as an Admin, it won't get easier.

"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 00:43
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

^ Romantic Warrior wasn't either quite apolitical, which can be seen in this excerpt from a poem entitled "The Romantic Warrior", 
written by Neville Potter and included as a part of the album's artwork :

Pick up the gauntlet warriors
sheath your swords put up your trusty lance
channel the power used to crush every foe
into giving the future a chance

Believe in yourselves old warriors bold
create a path so firm and sure
fight for the birth of the freedom of man
the end of this medieval overture.
What an inspiring poem!  It addresses my main concern.  I'm anti-war.  

So actually, Romantic Warrior may be a concept, anti-war album.


Edited by David_D - July 24 2024 at 00:43
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 02:33
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

My suggestion of some sort of self-moderation by the thread-opener - to help the work of the two institutional moderators - seems not to have been considered by any forumist.

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Whatever subjects we're talking about, it would surely be nice with more respect for each other and keep the PA rules. 
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 5988
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 03:29
Originally posted by Nogbad_The_Bad Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:

As long as you guys are talking about music I will leave this thread open. If it becomes a political discussion I'm closing it.



In my case, I've finished posting my contributions in this thread. 
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 03:46
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

My suggestion of some sort of self-moderation by the thread-opener - to help the work of the two institutional moderators - seems not to have been considered by any forumist.

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Whatever subjects we're talking about, it would surely be nice with more respect for each other and keep the PA rules. 
You can't expect people to be pretty nasty in other topics, and then suddenly very civilized in political discussions. It's about the general climate.

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5364
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 05:10
Ancient Rome's colonial policy was invasive but quite effective for its time. There was no mass media, no telephones, no quick ways of communication etc. back then. Romans had no other option but to use force against ignorance a lot of times.

The nations Romans conquered weren't some innocent pacifist liberal cutie pie babies. They were aggressive, they were full of political fanatics, they were willing to fight back not with diplomacy, but with rage and fire. It was a different time.

Still, their colonization policy was quite smart. It wasn't quite the mindless destructive "destory old bad - replace with good nu" method. It was more complex. An evidene of it would be how they approached conquering the Greek culture. They didn't wreck it. They modified it and embraced it. Zeus became Jupiter, Poseidon became Neptune and so on.

Edited by Hrychu - July 24 2024 at 05:15
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 5988
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 05:25
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

My suggestion of some sort of self-moderation by the thread-opener - to help the work of the two institutional moderators - seems not to have been considered by any forumist.

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Whatever subjects we're talking about, it would surely be nice with more respect for each other and keep the PA rules. 
You can't expect people to be pretty nasty in other topics, and then suddenly very civilized in political discussions. It's about the general climate.


I have no such expectations.

My proposal was intended to solve the problem of shortage of moderators: there are only two of them and they receive many complaints. 

By asking the one who opens a thread to be a moderator, you prevent this one from immediately going to the real moderators to complain, and you give him/her the authority to call out other forumists who intervene. This does not preclude the other forumists who intervene from being “negative” and not responding badly to the reprimands, I know. 

So, the person who opens the thread, and the forumists who wants to discuss correctly also takes the risk of being offended and knows they must move on.

However, at least the responsibility of those who are negative it'll be clear and they may not have the power to call for closure of the thread, because (in my opinion) one of the most absurd things is for someone to intervene in a thread to ask to close it. If you don't like it, avoid it.

Just to explain better my idea.
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 5988
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 05:26
I thank all the forumists who have expressed their opinions.

I thank the administrators, I know that sometimes it's not easy to make decisions.
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6343
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 05:29
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:


My proposal was intended to solve the problem of shortage of moderators: there are only two of them and they receive many complaints. 

By asking the one who opens a thread to be a moderator, you prevent this one from immediately going to the real moderators to complain, and you give him/her the authority to call out other forumists who intervene. This does not preclude the other forumists who intervene from being “negative” and not responding badly to the reprimands, I know. 

So, the person who opens the thread, and the forumists who wants to discuss correctly also takes the risk of being offended and knows they must move on.

However, at least the responsibility of those who are negative it'll be clear and they may not have the power to call for closure of the thread, because (in my opinion) one of the most absurd things is for someone to intervene in a thread to ask to close it. If you don't like it, avoid it.

Just to explain better my idea.


Exactly.  If you don't want to discuss politics...ignore the thread.
Back to Top
wiz_d_kidd View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 13 2018
Location: EllicottCityMD
Status: Offline
Points: 1423
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 07:05
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

Should PA have political discussions? It's up to the mods.  

That said, if you don't want to discuss or read political discussions... don't respond or read the political thread.  Just ignore it.  It's that simple.Wink



The problem is that threads often stray off topic. Someone might open a Pink Floyd thread, then someone starts talking about Roger Waters and his strong political views and BAM! -- the thread disintegrates into political diatribe, verbal assaults and insults, and generally immature behavior.

Someone else might start a thread about a news event, say an assassination attempt. It's about what happened and who did it and what is currently known, but it will inevitably be hijacked by some hater saying they're sorry the bullet missed, or someone else who claims it was a massive conspiracy by the political opposition.

I think PA should have a zero tolerance policy and ban (at least temporarily) anyone who starts a political thread, or hijacks an otherwise music-related thread to inject their venom -- whether it's politics, conspiracy theories, COVID misinformation, etc.

People of PA -- this is a music forum! Keep it that way.
“I don’t like country music, but I don’t mean to denigrate those who do. And for those who like country music, denigrate means to ‘put down.'” – Bob Newhart
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15132
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 24 2024 at 07:16
Originally posted by wiz_d_kidd wiz_d_kidd wrote:

The problem is that threads often stray off topic.

Yes, that's quite a problem, too.

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.335 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.