Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - America - Where’s Your  Empire?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAmerica - Where’s Your Empire?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>
Author
Message
Sweetnighter View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 14:08
Hey, well if you're looking for something an American can do for you, I'm sure gdub will oblige in window removal... thats something, isn't it! 

As an American myself, I certainly see the ups and downs of America's "empire." Certainly there are some downsides to American culture, i.e. dietary habits, among other things I'm sure you can think of them, but we have to look at things in perspective... as mentioned above, its far better than Nazi or Soviet rule. Also, democracy has taken hold and continues to in many third world countries since the end of World War Two... yes, some Americans use that as a justification for war in Iraq, I definitely don't... but its happening nonetheless.


I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 14:13
Originally posted by Peter Peter wrote:

Reedy: See Thomas Paine -- The Rights of Man, for one positive American contribution.Clap

See a democratic Germany and Japan for two more.Thumbs UpThumbs Up

Hopefully soon, we will also see an American-initiated (& largely funded) global tsunami warning system.Stern Smile

See Jayne Mansfield, Racquel Welch, Marilyn Monroe Tongue, country, folk, bluegrass, blues, jazz, rock and roll, and Echolyn for more.Big smile

(No excuse for Stynx, though....)Wink

BTW: Happy New Year, chum!Smile

Hmmmm...

A positive post for once!!!ClapThumbs Up

HAPPY (smiley,less-serious,self-deprecating) NEW YEAR

To You Peter

And all at Prog Archives Forum!

from the original sh*t-stain on a wedding dress!

Bon chance!



Edited by Reed Lover



Back to Top
Arioch View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 15:40

America did actually aquire quite a bit of territory after the Spanish-American War. We had captured or aquired The Phillipines as well as several other Islands in the Pacific and the Aluetians.

Also why doesn't Alaska and Hawaii not count. They were territories before they were states. That would be saying England couldn't count Canada, India, Egypt, or Australia as places they once occupied. That's just stupid.

Actually you could say the momemt after the revolution through much of the 18th century we were expanding our empire as we seized terrritory from the american indians and mexicans until we reached the Pacific.

So tell me why England once had the largest and most proud navy in the world and has let it shrink into a joke. What a shame! I guess they just don't need it, because they know the USA and it's fleet of 10 Super Carriers will protect them from invasion these days. How many Super Carriers do the rest of the world have?....the answer would be zero.



Edited by Arioch
Knight of the Swords
Lord of Entropy
Duke of Chaos
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 15:44

Originally posted by Arioch Arioch wrote:

So tell me why England once had the largest and most proud navy in the world and has let it shrink into a joke. What a shame! I guess they just don't need it, because they know the USA and it's fleet of 10 Super Carriers will protect them from invasion these days. How many Super Carriers do the rest of the world have?....the answer would be zero.

Well good for you!

That's really something to be very proud of!Clap




Back to Top
Arioch View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 15:48
That's the best you can do Reed Lover. Where's that wit of yours now?
Knight of the Swords
Lord of Entropy
Duke of Chaos
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 15:50

Originally posted by Arioch Arioch wrote:

That's the best you can do Reed Lover. Where's that wit of yours now?

So you are saying I am witty ???

I was kinda saying that if all you've got to offer the world is big boats with big guns then let's all jump for joy! Confused




Back to Top
Arioch View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 15:54
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Arioch Arioch wrote:

That's the best you can do Reed Lover. Where's that wit of yours now?

So you are saying I am witty ???

I was kinda saying that if all you've got to offer the world is big boats with big guns then let's all jump for joy! Confused

Yes...isn't that what England had all to offer for several centuries. Imitation is the best form of flattery Reedy my boy.

It certainly wasn't their culinary delights and cuisines.

Knight of the Swords
Lord of Entropy
Duke of Chaos
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 15:59
Originally posted by Arioch Arioch wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Arioch Arioch wrote:

That's the best you can do Reed Lover. Where's that wit of yours now?

So you are saying I am witty ???

I was kinda saying that if all you've got to offer the world is big boats with big guns then let's all jump for joy! Confused

Yes...isn't that what England had all to offer for several centuries. Imitation is the best form of flattery Reedy my boy.

It certainly wasn't their culinary delights and cuisines.

Is that it?

is that all you've got?

You wanna piece of me?Angry

It's like being savaged by a sheep!LOL




Back to Top
Eddy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 22 2004
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 637
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 18:08
i think you can say that irag might become our empire? and besides, the rest of the world is practically our empire! OOOOO! OOOO!
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 18:47
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:


If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short.



Maybe, maybe not. How many lives might have been saved if America had joined sooner?Confused



Reed, I respect your opinion but I have to call you on this. America in 1938-9 was still coming out of a depression and had very little military capabilities since all were retired at the end of WW1. There was no way we were in any positon to fight anyone. Pearl Harbor is a perfect example of our unreadiness. We did start to manufacture arms which I think almost all were given (not sold because all your WW2 debt to the US was forgiven) to Britan, France and The Soviet Union. Pray tell sir, What more could we have done until we went into all out mobilization? Which really took 2 -3 years to accomplish. We were not yet a real world power. Besides many in our country felt we had already given to many lives to wars in Europe and felt you could handle that one without us. All things considered it would have been 1940 instead of 41. We still had the Empire of Japan to deal with which BTW we received no help with at all.


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:03
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:


If it wasn't for the USA, Britain and the other European countries mentioned by sigod (including the neutral countries mentioned) might still be part of an empire: either a Nazi empire or a Soviet empire (probably the latter). Collective memory is very short.



Maybe, maybe not. How many lives might have been saved if America had joined sooner?Confused



Reed, I respect your opinion but I have to call you on this. America in 1938-9 was still coming out of a depression and had very little military capabilities since all were retired at the end of WW1. There was no way we were in any positon to fight anyone. Pearl Harbor is a perfect example of our unreadiness. We did start to manufacture arms which I think almost all were given (not sold because all your WW2 debt to the US was forgiven) to Britan, France and The Soviet Union. Pray tell sir, What more could we have done until we went into all out mobilization? Which really took 2 -3 years to accomplish. We were not yet a real world power. Besides many in our country felt we had already given to many lives to wars in Europe and felt you could handle that one without us. All things considered it would have been 1940 instead of 41. We still had the Empire of Japan to deal with which BTW we received no help with at all.

Actually that is not true at all Garion. Britain reaverted quite a few ships over to the Indian Ocean to combat the Japanese..or at least protect their interests..either way..this distracted a number of Japanese capital ships to guard over this potential threat.  They had the Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese in Indonesia. Australia helped as much as it could as well.

Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:05
Japan also had concerns with China and even the Soviet Union as well so it wasn't just a USA vs Japan war in the Pacific Theatre of Operations.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:08
Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Actually that is not true at all Garion. Britain reaverted quite a few ships over to the Indian Ocean to combat the Japanese..or at least protect their interests..either way..this distracted a number of Japanese capital ships to guard over this potential threat.  They had the Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese in Indonesia. Australia helped as much as it could as well.



Ok I stand corrected. I also think Stalin sent some troops also but just to grab some more land. Gdub I think I meant no one gave the save commitment as we did.


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:13
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Actually that is not true at all Garion. Britain reaverted quite a few ships over to the Indian Ocean to combat the Japanese..or at least protect their interests..either way..this distracted a number of Japanese capital ships to guard over this potential threat.  They had the Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese in Indonesia. Australia helped as much as it could as well.



Ok I stand corrected. I also think Stalin sent some troops also but just to grab some more land. Gdub I think I meant no one gave the save commitment as we did.

They gave what they could. Every country was strapped for resources and no-one enjoyed the vast military war machine we were producing, except maybe the Russians, but every bit was needed to take on Hitler's War Machine. England and Russia had their hands full and did what they could.

No-one lost as many capital ships and shipping as england...except maybe the Japanese...but they were the losers so what do you expect?

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:18

Bah, all this tripe is old news.

You lot are still stuck in 2004!

We  Brits are offivially 2005 ers!

LOL

Hic, I mean officially 2005 ers!! LOLLOL



Edited by Reed Lover



Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:19
Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Actually that is not true at all Garion. Britain reaverted quite a few ships over to the Indian Ocean to combat the Japanese..or at least protect their interests..either way..this distracted a number of Japanese capital ships to guard over this potential threat.  They had the Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese in Indonesia. Australia helped as much as it could as well.


Ok I stand corrected. I also think Stalin sent some troops also but just to grab some more land. Gdub I think I meant no one gave the save commitment as we did.


They gave what they could. Every country was strapped for resources and no-one enjoyed the vast military war machine we were producing, except maybe the Russians, but every bit was needed to take on Hitler's War Machine. England and Russia had their hands full and did what they could.


No-one lost as many capital ships and shipping as england...except maybe the Japanese...but they were the losers so what do you expect?




I do understand that. They gave more because the war was in their countries. But I don't understand how in history that we (the united states) comes out as the bad guy? Did we not contribute everything we had also?


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:25
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Actually that is not true at all Garion. Britain reaverted quite a few ships over to the Indian Ocean to combat the Japanese..or at least protect their interests..either way..this distracted a number of Japanese capital ships to guard over this potential threat.  They had the Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese in Indonesia. Australia helped as much as it could as well.


Ok I stand corrected. I also think Stalin sent some troops also but just to grab some more land. Gdub I think I meant no one gave the save commitment as we did.


They gave what they could. Every country was strapped for resources and no-one enjoyed the vast military war machine we were producing, except maybe the Russians, but every bit was needed to take on Hitler's War Machine. England and Russia had their hands full and did what they could.


No-one lost as many capital ships and shipping as england...except maybe the Japanese...but they were the losers so what do you expect?




I do understand that. They gave more because the war was in their countries. But I don't understand how in history that we (the united states) comes out as the bad guy? Did we not contribute everything we had also?

Garion Waffling! LOLLOLLOL

starring Gdub as kenneth Williams

and Garion as Sid James.  arr arrr arrr, ooer missus!

LOL




Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:28
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Originally posted by gdub411 gdub411 wrote:

Actually that is not true at all Garion. Britain reaverted quite a few ships over to the Indian Ocean to combat the Japanese..or at least protect their interests..either way..this distracted a number of Japanese capital ships to guard over this potential threat.  They had the Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk by the Japanese in Indonesia. Australia helped as much as it could as well.


Ok I stand corrected. I also think Stalin sent some troops also but just to grab some more land. Gdub I think I meant no one gave the save commitment as we did.


They gave what they could. Every country was strapped for resources and no-one enjoyed the vast military war machine we were producing, except maybe the Russians, but every bit was needed to take on Hitler's War Machine. England and Russia had their hands full and did what they could.


No-one lost as many capital ships and shipping as england...except maybe the Japanese...but they were the losers so what do you expect?




I do understand that. They gave more because the war was in their countries. But I don't understand how in history that we (the united states) comes out as the bad guy? Did we not contribute everything we had also?

Garion Waffling! LOLLOLLOL

starring Gdub as kenneth Williams

and Garion as Sid James.  arr arrr arrr, ooer missus!

LOL

no...we all contributed to the war equally is all I am saying....except France....and don't get me started on Sweden!

P.S....go to bed you drunken oaf....Mr Reed Lover!

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:32

Whassh the mater wish yousz?

drunk moi?

nah, Only just onto bottle 3 of the vIno!

a very nice Wolf Blass Cab Sauv   ......... nice!




Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2004 at 19:44
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Whassh the mater wish yousz?

drunk moi?

nah, Only just onto bottle 3 of the vIno!

a very nice Wolf Blass Cab Sauv   ......... nice!

you're starting to talk like Eddy.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.273 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.