UK Politics |
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Author | ||
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
Topic: UK Politics Posted: August 06 2010 at 11:25 |
|
There have been some great discussions here during and post-election so I thought a general-purpose UK politics thread might be worth a try. Non-UK residents are obviously more than welcome to chip in as well.
I'd like to start the ball rolling by asking what everyone thinks of the government's overall spending cut policy. Is cutting the deficit really the most important thing we should be doing right now, or might a lack of investment in the public sector damage our economy in the long-term? Some food for thought on this issue here. |
||
mystic fred
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
Posted: August 06 2010 at 11:47 | |
the spending cut policy is too harsh and will be damaging to certain sectors of society - namely the vulnerable, but i appaud their plans to root out the benefit cheats.. meanwhile the banks are back raking it in again but not lending....
Cameron, unfortunately, has shown his inexperience and incompetence in a few short months - gaff gaff gaff he's too much like a slick car salesman, all smiles and good intentions don't last long, we will soon see if he has any substance in the months to come.
President Obama used our Health Service as a model for change but the Tories will soon set about wrecking it all for us
Edited by mystic fred - August 06 2010 at 11:50 |
||
Prog Archives Tour Van
|
||
Finnforest
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Offline Points: 17135 |
Posted: August 06 2010 at 11:50 | |
Cool, I want to learn more about UK politics!
Will be watching and maybe joining in on occasion
|
||
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: August 06 2010 at 13:58 | |
Their overall spending policy will probably mean I will loose my job sometimes next year. I am not a frontline service so they can dispense with me. I am seriously worried now. |
||
sleeper
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 09 2005 Location: Entropia Status: Offline Points: 16449 |
Posted: August 06 2010 at 15:13 | |
I can see the nead to cut back on public spending but the way they've gone about it through giving the chop to whole serveces doesnt seem to be a good way of doing it. OK, some of those serveces, councils, weekend get-togethers we could have done without but I fail to see how dispencing with the UK Film Council is a good thing.
|
||
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
||
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
Posted: August 07 2010 at 03:18 | |
Excuse the selective quoting but I wanted to pick up on this point. I'm sure we can all agree that discouraging people from exploiting the benefit system is a good thing, but the way in which the Tories propose to do it have me deeply concerned. Making people poorer does not help them find jobs. I myself have been looking for work for the last few months and have had no success so far. I am not entitled to Job Seeker\s Allowance because my partner works full time. Never mind that she earns minimum wage and is too young to be eligible for working tax credits. We are still trying to process our claim for Housing Benefit and in the meantime we are facing the distinct possibility of being unable to pay the rent this month. I am keenly aware that if I got a decent job all this would solved in a flash. It doesn't make me any more likely to find one.
|
||
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 22 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 16130 |
Posted: August 07 2010 at 09:18 | |
UK politics has gone down an inevitable path in my opinion. A coalition government - which has happened before - is the result of a homogenisation of policy across the three main parties. A dissillusioned electorate no longer trusts any one party. This can be construed as a good or bad thing, depending on your own personal stance. Some would argue that in the longer term a more stable economy could be achieved by all parties striking a careful balance between tax and spend. Historically Labour taxed and spent, and the Tories chopped and privatised.
That's an ideal model though; all parties agreeing on how best to achieve a stable economy, and in reality I perosnally dont think this is attainable. On the issue of the budget cuts, I think they are too harsh. The recovery of an economy can't be based solely on cutting the public sector to death, in the belief that the private sector will pick up the jobless from the public sector. There needs to be up front investment in jobs creation. Banks need to start lending to small businesses again, to get things moving. The tax payer has bailed these greedy b*****ds out, and they are nearly all making a healthy profit once more. It's time to start putting it back. Lets be clear about the extent of public sector cuts. Natioanlly we are looking at potential job losses of over 600,000. The private sector is not going to re-employ a large chunk of that figure, certainly not in the short term. The Tories are using the budget deficit as an excuse to implement to sort of cuts, one may expect of the Tories anyway. Meanwhile Nick Clegg, in his rather restricted capacity as deputy PM, has managed to alienate vast swathes of Lib Dem voters, scuppering any small chance they may have had of obtaining outright power at the next election, and ultimately pushing the party back in to a distant third place behind Labour. It's an interesting and rather worrying time for UK politics, imo. Looking back over the NuLabour years, it has to be said that despite the watering down - or complete drowing - of the party's socialist element, they did invest vast amounts of money in health and education. Many people take these improvements for granted, as we naturally expect our public services to be there when we need them, in a state that we expect. For all those who think NuLabour done little for this coutry, prepare to be very disturbed and dissapointed by what happens over the next four years. Be under no illusion; our public services are f***ed! I was alife long Labour voter, albeit one who cursed them for abolishing clause 4 of their constitution and playing such a major part in an illegal war in Iraq, and an unwinnable conflict in Afghanistan. Would the Tories have done anything different in this respect? Of course not. I now judge individual politicans on their own personal merits, as I interpret them, and have no single allegience to any one party. I genuinely dont know who to vote for in the next election, but one thing is sure, I'll be in a wooden box, with hell frozen over, before voting Tory. None of the above is stated as fact. It is opinion only. I dont claim to know better than anyone else. The opinions are based on perceptions. Like most of not all people here, I'm not an economist |
||
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: August 07 2010 at 10:50 | |
I think we are in an era of Tabloid politics, with all parties producing policies that are superficial and lacking in any real depth or understanding. Everyone is reading the headlines and making snap judgements without a solid foundation in how things work, how things can work and how things should work. All they see are polarised view of how they believe they ought to work based upon some idealised political models that were born in the end of the 19th century that have never worked and never will.
There is no single "Public Sector" so there isn't a general panacea that will solve all ills at a single sweep - there are hundreds of small public sectors, each unique and individually tailored to the particular service they were created to provide - the solutions to each one will be equally as unique and individually tailored to fit the needs of that service. Glib statements about reducing this or cutting that, by outlandish numbers like 40%, are meaningless and destined to fail as a domino effect of collapse of each service will result in the Govt having to step in and take corrective action to heal the damage they've created, wiping out any short-term gains they may have made and replacing them with a net loss as the cost of each fix will be more than the projected saving.
The obvious and most visible example of the Public Sector is the NHS - the UKs biggest employer with 1.37 million staff. There is knee-jerk outcry at the number of managers employed within the Health Service and Tabloid politics says cut them.
There are 39,000 administrators and 380,000 nurses out of a total workforce of 1,370,000 - that's 1 manager for every 35 employees - or 1 manager for every 9.7 nurses - since not all of those admins will be managing nurses, then the actual number of nurses being managed by a single manager will be much higher. I've been a manager in the private sector for the best part of thirty years and those figures sound a heavy to me - the technical term is called "Span of Control" and is the numerical management of staff based upon the supervision level required by a group of workers - this figure is governed by the relative skill-level of the people being managed and the less skilled the workforce the more workers a single manager/supervisor can manage. To a non-manager that may sound backwards and illogical - surely a skilled worker requires less supervision, but skilled workers take more of a manager's time, therefore they can manager fewer in any working day. [and let's not bog this down by arguing about what a manager does - it is considerably more than just telling people what to do]. The general figure for the number of skilled staff a manager can cope with is around 5-8, and from my experience that sounds about right - increase that ratio and the system becomes inefficient with the skilled workers doing more of the administrative duties themselves rather than concentrating on what they are employed and trained to do - based on that the number of administrators and managers in the Health Service is too low. So if the Health Service needs 380,000 nurses (and I don't doubt that) then it needs more than 39,000 administrators - cut the number of administrators and the number of nurses has to be reduced proportionally.
|
||
What?
|
||
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
Posted: August 07 2010 at 11:05 | |
Thiis harsh but the answer is...take ANY job......Asda, Tesco, pub...whatever, until you find what you sre looking for.
|
||
mystic fred
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
Posted: August 07 2010 at 11:12 | |
I should have been more specific David, when i wrote that i was thinking of the "Jazz Dancer" recently exposed as a benefit cheat, he was claiming benefit for severe arthritis and dancing the Fandango ....
good luck finding a job David, remember you can dazzle them
|
||
Prog Archives Tour Van
|
||
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
Posted: August 07 2010 at 11:51 | |
Don't think I haven't tried. I have no career aspirations, all I want is a wage I can live on. My writing/performance work is my career, it just doesn't pay the bills. In the last month I have applied to every call centre and retail job going, but I've not had so much as an interview. From any employers perspective, why would they give the job to an inexperienced arts graduate when they have dozens of other applicants with years of work experience behind them? Anyway, we're getting off topic here... Andy, you made some excellent points regarding the three main parties all shifting towards the centre-ground and the inevitable disconnection that causes. In my brief time as an elligible voter I have always voted Lib Dem, viewing them as the only major party which gets close to representing my views on certain issues. Labour's increasingly authoritarian streak and warmongering was always a major obstacle for me, and likewise I'd never so much as contemplate voting Tory. Yet now, with Clegg's discgraceful u-turn on spending cuts the moment he got a sniff of power I feel completely cut off from all three parties. Dean, you're bang on the money with this tabloid attitude to the public sector. I've nothing useful to add, but I wanted to acknowledge your valuable contribution. |
||
Syzygy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 16 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 7003 |
Posted: August 08 2010 at 06:32 | |
Benefit fraud is something that needs to be tackled, but tax evasion by major corporations and the obscenely rich costs the country far more. It would be nice if 'call me Dave' would at least acknowledge that. I've been lucky enough to survive an unpleasant culling in the college where I work, but the public sector cuts are more likely to lead us into a double dip than to solve any immediate problems. A simple freeze on recruitment for 2 - 3 years, coupled with realistic voluntary redundancy schemes, would go a long way to cutting costs without leading to an upsurge in people claiming benefits.
And another thing - the 'big society' - I'm not sure where this army of volunteers is going to spring up from. Admittedly there'll be lots of people out of work, but if you're engaged in voluntary work you're not available for employment and therefore ineligible for benefits. I think I missed the plans to tackle that particular issue.
|
||
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute to the already rich among us...' Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom |
||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: August 08 2010 at 07:03 | |
Benefit cheats is just a minor problem (max 5 bills of the 156 bills in budget deficit) and a scapegoat for every government. Remember, people on benefits have no voice and no defence. Another thing....... If they tackle alcoholism, unhealthy lifestyles and social deprivation on the many estates, there will hardly be no need for UK to borrow money at all. Remember, the food and drinks industry have billions of pounds in resources and hundreds of lobbyists. My guess is that this government will just use people on benefits as scapegoats for all the ills in the world and not tackle the issues which has led to this mess.
Edited by toroddfuglesteg - August 08 2010 at 07:05 |
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: August 08 2010 at 07:43 | |
^ Benefit 'scapegoats' is just another example of the Tabloid politics I referred to - I accept there is a problem, (all be it a small problem) and that it needs to be addressed, but the current 'policies' are scatter-gun policies that effect the innocent and the guilty alike. This pervading attitude, (once limited to only the blue-rinse brigade) that all benefit claimants are fraudulent is being exaggerated and misused to slip through right-wing policies that Maggie Thatcher could only dreamt of in her wildest power-induced fantasies.
|
||
What?
|
||
toroddfuglesteg
Forum Senior Member Retired Joined: March 04 2008 Location: Retirement Home Status: Offline Points: 3658 |
Posted: August 08 2010 at 08:06 | |
A donation from the drink producers to the party funds keeps the government away from dealing with the real issues here. Three months ago and on a Thursday night, I had to go to the local Accident & Emergency dep at my local hospital after a small accident (flesh wound) on my push bike. I was the only stone cold sober person admitted there that night. The rest was all alcohol related accidents and very avoidable. Most of them Buckfast related, an drink produced by a company who has never paid tax in the UK because they are a registered charity. There you have a lot of the 156 bill budget deficit and the next hellish five years here. But would anyone dare to fix this ? No. The thing is that we all knows what has to be done to fix the problem. We have all seen the sink estates and the millions of people who are outside this society. We all knows that picking on benefits receivers and gypsies does not solve anything. This time around, I am not sure if this scapegoat thing will help. In particular when the kids dies before their parents due to alcohol, bad food, no jobs, bad housing and drugs. Edited by toroddfuglesteg - August 08 2010 at 08:10 |
||
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 31 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 5964 |
Posted: August 08 2010 at 09:10 | |
Gah, this 'big society' bullsh*t makes me so angry. It's just a mask for slashing public services. One of the examples is having libraries run by volunteers. Apparently we can afford to lob billions of taxpayer's money to the bloated banking sector yet we can't afford to pay a librarian's wages? Pathetic. |
||
mystic fred
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
Posted: August 09 2010 at 02:32 | |
The situation with University and College grads. will not get any easier this year, the funding has been cut further and many students will find themselves competing with hundreds of equally qualified applicants for the same few jobs, media studies, law and the arts have taken over from science subjects, i fear the cleverest most useful people will "temporarily" end up in Debenhams, MacDonalds, building sites...or go abroad. .
At my College they have opened up a new centre for Plumbing, Electrician and Joinery courses for the ones that have no qualifications, by the time they are thirty they could be running their own businesses and doing much better than the grads...
|
||
Prog Archives Tour Van
|
||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: August 09 2010 at 02:36 | |
So, am I the only one who supports the Scottish National Party?
|
||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: August 09 2010 at 02:44 | |
May not be a UK resident, but that seems to be the trend through a lot of the "developed" world. It's important...but I am a bit appalled at how deficit is now the greatest evil and unemployment...meh |
||
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 26 2008 Location: Declined Status: Offline Points: 16715 |
Posted: August 09 2010 at 03:42 | |
To be fair, in the US at least, pretty much all of that has been paid back with interest. I never got into the populist anger about bailouts, they're just loans. And also, wouldn't it make sense you wouldn't have money for anything else if you're paying all that money? ;-) Anyway, I don't actually follow UK politics so I have nothing else to add. Oh, except that the idea that someone in any western country at this point in time can just "get a job" if they're willing to lower their standards is ridiculous. We have stacks and stacks of applications from people, and from all those we pretty much only hire college-age students (we even had a few minors earlier in the year, which was ridiculous because minors aren't good at anything) because they're the only ones who are willing to work part time for $8.50/hour, as we stopped giving anybody full time a long time ago. $8.50/hour isn't bad for an entry level job (minimum wage in the US is $7.25), but you can't live in Manassas on $8.50. And Trouserpress can't live on the UK equivalent (especially with your taxes, yeeesh!). Epignosis couldn't get a sh*tty retail job either, he has a degree and was teaching English for (some amount) of years, they want somebody who they know is going to work hard and not grieviously injure themselves, a degree doesn't show any of that.
No, life is not that easy. Besides the fact that you have to pay for those courses, and education is never cheap. Or maybe we'll have a glut of skilled labor because people think it's a surefire way to make money. The comparisons aren't exact, obviously, but we do have far too many lawyers and there are still a ton of people signing up for law school. Edited by Henry Plainview - August 09 2010 at 03:52 |
||
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |