| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Dorsalia 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 21 2006
Location: Cape Mola
Status: Offline
Points: 367
|
 Topic: Mike Patton v/s Daniel Gildenlow
Posted: July 21 2007 at 04:15 |
As vocalists. NOT composers.
What do you think?
how I hate vs polls... 
Edited by Dorsalia - July 21 2007 at 04:16
|
|
"Es ist übrigens unmöglich, eine Meinung zu haben, ohne dass es unerfreuliche Überschneidungen gibt. Die Grünen sind für den deutschen Wald, die NPD ebenfalls."
|
 |
Firefly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 384
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 05:17 |
|
Patton for me.
|
|
sleeper
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:31 |
|
If your asking us whos the better vocalist, then its Gildenlow by a country mile.
|
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
|
Firefly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 384
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:33 |
not in my opinon... 
Edited by Firefly - July 21 2007 at 06:33
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21677
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:41 |
|
As vocalists: Mike Patton without any hesitation. And even not limited to vocals I would vote for him ... he's simply much more versatile and resourceful.
|
|
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31655
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:47 |
 MikeEnRegalia wrote:
As vocalists: Mike Patton without any hesitation. And even not limited to vocals I would vote for him ... he's simply much more versatile and resourceful. |
Agree. Although they both have similar voices, I think Patton has the best range and technique!
|
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
Firefly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 384
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:51 |
|
Plus, he can pull it of live too.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21677
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:52 |
Here are some samples to listen to: http://www.myspace.com/mrbungle
|
|
|
|
Firefly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 29 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 384
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 06:55 |
Bj-1 wrote:
Agree. Although they both have similar voices, I think Patton has the best range and technique! |
Now I'm confused. These 2 don't sound even remotely alike!
|
|
Philéas
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 07:07 |
|
Patton by a million miles.
Edited by Philéas - July 21 2007 at 07:07
|
|
Asphalt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 456
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 07:23 |
|
I appreciate Patton's talent, but I just prefer Gildenlow. Strikes a chord with me.
|
|
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:18 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
As vocalists: Mike Patton without any hesitation. And even not limited to vocals I would vote for him ... he's simply much more versatile and resourceful.
|
Not to mention he's freaking hilarious.
|
|
Arsillus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:25 |
|
Patton is better. He's more diverse in his singing styles.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:28 |
Dorsalia wrote:
As vocalists. NOT composers.
What do you think?
how I hate vs polls... |
I think Mike Patton probably wears the nicest shoes. 
However, just for his vocals on Angel Dust alone: Patton.
|
|
What?
|
|
ProgBagel
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2819
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 11:31 |
|
Patton is just a little to wierd and just likes the show his talent a little more.
Daniel.
|
|
el böthy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 12:41 |
|
Patton is good, but he hasnt done anything that had amazed me as much as some stuff by Gildenlöw
|
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
|
Meddler
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2005
Location: Massillon
Status: Offline
Points: 881
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 12:52 |
|
Patton. I would have said by a mile, but after hearing BE, I hadn't really known how awesome Gildenlow was. Both incredible singers!!!!111
|
|
[IMG]http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/amorfous/astro-1.jpg">
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31655
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 17:31 |
Firefly wrote:
Bj-1 wrote:
Agree. Although they both have similar voices, I think Patton has the best range and technique! |
Now I'm confused. These 2 don't sound even remotely alike! |
They are quite similar actually, just listen 
|
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
King of Loss
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16954
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 18:18 |
This one is a no brainer.
Just listen to Patton live and Gildenlow live....
|
|
chamberry
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008
|
Posted: July 21 2007 at 18:26 |
|
I like Patton's quirky and weird style, although Gildenlow is an excellent singer.
|
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Mike Patton v/s Daniel Gildenlow
