New entries - inconsistency
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9522
Printed Date: February 24 2025 at 16:50
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: New entries - inconsistency
Posted By: Dragon Phoenix
Subject: New entries - inconsistency
Date Posted: August 03 2005 at 07:46
| I noticed that Queen* is already in the alphabetical overview, whereas for instance Eno* and Jarre* are not. |
Replies:
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: August 07 2005 at 22:34
|
I've noticed that too. Although, i can't explain why. This has been no help, sry. ------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: August 08 2005 at 15:16
|
It's all down to the asterisk, which marks a band entry as being "under construction". If it appears at the start of the name, as it does with Jarrre and Eno, the alphabetic listing won't see them as the first letter of their name is *. If it's at the end, as it is with Queen, then Q is still the first letter. Perhaps those upstairs could make it a policy to put the asterisk at the end of the name?
|