Report bugs here - Tantra ratings

Print Page | Close Window

Tantra ratings

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Report bugs here
Forum Description: Help us improve the site from a tech standpoint
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=93406
Printed Date: December 04 2024 at 12:56
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com

Topic: Tantra ratings

Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Subject: Tantra ratings
Date Posted: May 08 2013 at 23:06

I just want to ask this question because it puzzles me.

¿How can the Humanoid Flesh by Tantra have a 3.45 stars rating?

3.45
(11 ratings)

Essential: a masterpiece of progressive rock music(0%)

Excellent addition to any prog rock music collection(0%)

Good, but non-essential (50%)

Collectors/fans only (17%)

Poor. Only for completionists (33%)

http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=1296" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=1296

- Has 11 reviews

Rated like this

- 0% 5 stars

- 0% 4 stars

- 50% 3 stars

- 17% 2 stars

- 33% 1 star

Not a mathematician, but I thought that to have a 3.45 stars average, would require to have at least a couple 4 or 5 stars rating Wink

Seems that the system is not working ok.

Iván

-------------

Replies:

Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: May 09 2013 at 01:52

It is because it hasn't been rated in over two years so the average hasn't been recalculated since a whole bunch of bogus ratings were deleted last year. The next time someone rates the album it will force a recalculation.

This is one of the reasons I'm against deleting bogus ratings - I cannot force a global rating recalculation so a lot of averages get screwed up - but people insist I do so I do, and everything gets screwed.

-------------
What?