Print Page | Close Window

Prog Reviewer

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: I Have A Question For You......?
Forum Description: Ask any question on any subject: if the admin team or any of our members can answer it we will.
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84911
Printed Date: February 24 2025 at 14:44
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Prog Reviewer
Posted By: tamijo
Subject: Prog Reviewer
Date Posted: February 11 2012 at 03:07

Im not sure i fully understand the definitions around here.

 

What is this thing called a Prog Reviewer - sometimes you look up an album, and you find highlighted reviews from a person that have only made relatively few reviews, and was last online sometime back in 2004.

This is just an example : not personally anything against this person :

Just saying, this is not that much more interesting:

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=12937" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=12937

Than This :

  http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=585363" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=585363

 

I know i may be starting a fire, but it just dosent seem fair, especialy if we want people to write long time consuming reviews, that they are hidden away like that.



-------------
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours



Replies:
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: February 11 2012 at 03:39
The FAQ's explain all, here: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=13080" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=13080
 
It is a thorny issue when it comes to what we should do when people stop contributing on a regular basis, particularly as sadly some are no longer with us.


Posted By: tamijo
Date Posted: February 11 2012 at 03:55

Ok - fair enough, but I think it would be good to highlight the last 2-3 reviews, more than it is today.

Would make it more likely that at least some people would read them.  


-------------
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours


Posted By: ExittheLemming
Date Posted: February 11 2012 at 08:16
Originally posted by tamijo tamijo wrote:

Im not sure i fully understand the definitions around here.

 

What is this thing called a Prog Reviewer - sometimes you look up an album, and you find highlighted reviews from a person that have only made relatively few reviews, and was last online sometime back in 2004.

This is just an example : not personally anything against this person :

Just saying, this is not that much more interesting:

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=12937" rel="nofollow - Than This :

  http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=585363" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=585363

 

I know i may be starting a fire, but it just dosent seem fair, especialy if we want people to write long time consuming reviews, that they are hidden away like that.



We always take your comments on-board and welcome the feedback. However, we are not looking for 'long time consuming reviews' we are looking specifically for reviews that are informative, well balanced and cognisant of the Progressive Rock genre as a whole irrespective of length or writing ability. Quality will always trump quantity in the grand scheme of things and help make PA achieve it's stated aim of being the most complete and powerful ../Progressive-rock.asp" rel="nofollow - progressive rock resource.

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk