Bad Cover Art
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=77501
Printed Date: February 22 2025 at 10:27
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Bad Cover Art
Posted By: Paravion
Subject: Bad Cover Art
Date Posted: April 13 2011 at 13:37
Post pictures of coverart you think is very bad. |
Replies:
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 13 2011 at 13:47
^ Bootleg art is never going to win any prizes  ------------- What? |
Posted By: Horizons
Date Posted: April 13 2011 at 17:48
 |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:14
|
Is cover art one word now? ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:15
It is in Danish.  I don't know actually.. probably not.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:16
And is it ok now to post penises without any warning? And make a thread about this subject for the 8 millionth time? ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Snow Dog wrote:Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:17
I have to say I read it wrong the first time and didn't understand. I had to look in the thread to see what was up.  ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:18
yep...the mailman hates those penis packages. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:21
|
I never liked Nivermind cover, it makes me not wanna buy it, which is bad becouse I like the album -------------  
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:25
You can't really see them, but if it's a problem, I suppose I can understand why. About the frequency of this thread-type. I checked prior to the making of it, probably not as thoroughly as I could have. Mostly the threads of this type were about "prog covers". I did find one thread, dating back to 2006, but the topic was closed. |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:33
You can't really see them is not at all the phrase I would choose to describe that image.
Well, as I recall (I'm also too lazy to go check), people always also post bad non-prog covers because they can't resist. The prog part is just so people can inline NSFW album covers without warning with the dubious justification that they're hosted on PA.
Well I don't care what the mailman thinks, I need my penis packages!
I don't like Nirvana, but it's always made me a little uncomfortable too. Maybe I'm just a repressed American. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 04:39
Why? Maybe I'm just too shortsighted (btw, I didn't describe the image)
?
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:12
------------- What? |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:14
|
If someone post Love Beach again I may have to scream with the sheer tediousness of it. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:15
|
The penii have gone! ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:24
Thanks. Really, I got curious and googled the abbreviation to find out that it means not safe/suitable for work, which in itself is very funny, I had no idea such a category existed. I see now that the two naked German hippies, a picture I surely wouldn't consider sexually explicit or an instance of profanity, have disappeared. I'll not protest, but seriously, I think it's a bit uptight.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:25
I agree. But on the other hand, who wants to stumble over some floppy dicks? ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:41
------------- What? |
Posted By: Adams Bolero
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:44
Damn I missed the penis!
Oh well I guess this will have to do:
 ------------- ''Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal.'' - Albert Camus |
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:48
 Sorry SD, I couldn't resist.. |
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 05:55
...well, they aren't floppy...  ------------- What? |
Posted By: seventhsojourn
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 06:07
The Return of the Durutti Column... that sandpaper, yeuch!
 |
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 06:07
Deliberately bad:
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened... 
|
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 14:07
A couple of my recent finds:   http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f69/Tuzvihar/z7049533X.jpg" rel="nofollow - CENSORED http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f69/Tuzvihar/z7049538X-1.jpg" rel="nofollow - CENSORED ------------- "Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent." Charles Bukowski |
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: April 14 2011 at 14:13
! ------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood) |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 18:35
Well, it's evolved from the original definition of "This could be considered pornography and may get you fired" to a courtesy warning for any explicit content that someone might not want to see (or have others see them see).
Not even remotely uptight. Do you consider it normal to surprise people with pictures of penises without their consent? Perhaps while they're in a public place and it might be embarrassing. If you are fine with that then I have plenty of websites I can suggest you browse instead. Ok sure, maybe it's "art" and not "pornography" (that is not a distinction I care about or wish to discuss) but there are plenty of legitimate reasons for someone to not want to see a penis (much less a dirty German hippy penis) and you have no right to force it upon them. If you'd linked to it with a warning I wouldn't have said anything, I've certainly seen worse on the internet, but have some courtesy for other forum members. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 19:06
You were saying it's stupid to have laws that cater for people feeling offended, Henry; now you're advocating the exact opposite view. I'm disappointed.  |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 19:15
Psh, I thought it was pretty clear I did not mean right in the legal sense. ;-) Although there are laws about showing pornography to minors. There was one case in my area of a guy going up to girls at a school bus stop with porn playing on his laptop. I think they eventually got him, it was so long ago I can't clearly remember. I always wondered what type of porn it was that he thought was so important that he had to share. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 19:31
|
Real world legislation and forum rules are basically the same, at the level we're talking here. I'm sure the image was not pornographic; penis or boob does not necessarely pornography make, which means (according to the "site rules and regulations") the image went under "offensive images", which makes my point. You officially hate it when laws (rules) come to the rescue of people feeling offended, yet you reported an "offensive" image. Of course if it actually was a pornographic image then I wrongly interpreted the situation. |
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 19:45
I am sure you would not consider it pornography. But there is a huge difference between rules against tasteless content being enforced by a private organization on their own property and by the government. The reasons nudity without a warning should not be allowed on a forum that is intended to be welcoming to everyone seem fairly obvious to me. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 19:57
|
I disagree on the first count, our forum rules and moderation pretty much mirror the way society regulates itself in the "traditional" public space. But I agree on the second count, and I think the only difference between us is where we draw the line between appropriate and unappropriate - which makes the whole issue a completely subjective one, i.e. a case where no rules should be set, according to you from our "Coran burning and free speach" debate.
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 15 2011 at 20:08
Generally I listen to music with good cover art, here are some highlights of the worst covert arts I encountered in 2010:      I didn't put prog covers and prog-metal covers because while I find them ugly in general, people here like them. |
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:02
I can't share your interpretation of the series of events. I was not in any way out to surprise people with pictures of penises. I was posting what I considered an instance of very bad cover art - It didn't enter my mind that the naked people in the picture could be offensive to anyone here (then I learned something). It was not a picture of penises, it was a picture of two naked men, of course having penises. If you were to cut out the penis-areas of the picture and isolate them, you'd probably not be able to recognize what you'd see as penises. PENIS WARNING!! NSFW http://www.popsike.com/pix/20090412/120405445803.jpg" rel="nofollow - http://www.popsike.com/pix/20090412/120405445803.jpg  |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:04
|
PENIS WARNING.....I'll have to have that on the front of my pants. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:05
|
.......and the back? ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:17
Don't think I'd segregate Crsuh Depth as an example of bad art - the original is on silver foil and works works just fine. It's not fine art, but it suits the music.
Again, don't see this as a particularly notable example of bad cover art - it's lazy photoshopping but not unexpected from Ms Goldfrapp and her preoccupation with personal image. ------------- What? |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:22
|
Yeah, there's nothing outrageous in those. Personally I disliked them and found them bellow what they should have been, quality-wise, but that's not exceptionally bad by any means. For real stinkers I'd have to look far beyond such a small selection (2010 albums that I listened). (And I expected you to post about those two particular albums. ) |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:36
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:39
But sure as eggs are eggs, when it comes to album covers of nudity or bad art, some clown will eventually post the Millie Jackson cover and someother clown will post the Blind Faith cover.
------------- What? |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:46
|
^You forgot the clown posting Love Beach. Not bad taste, but a tired cliche. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:46
The left part of this artwork is...disturbing  ------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood) |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 09:47
|
^typical Geiger. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 10:44
I must admit that I fail to understand why it's clownish behavior to post the covers I assume you're talking about in this thread which is about ugly, distasteful and otherwise bad cover art. I acknowledge the NSFW restriction, I know my own boundary (Virgin Killer for instance), but the Blind Faith cover? It's very distasteful, yes, but I surely would identify a prohibition against it as an instance of being way too uptight, and if someone were to post a picture of it, I'd certainly feel that it would be an appropriate addition.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 10:46
|
^Is the Blind Faith cover distasteful? I don't find it to be. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 10:51
| ^Perhaps not very distasteful, but sure, I think it's distasteful.. |
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 10:51
The cover itself is not the reason for me to regard it as clownish behaviour, what is clownish is reason behind the desire to post it. People post that cover for the reaction, not for the image itself. ------------- What? |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 10:53
Ok. We differ on that then. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 11:03
Isn't that a little too speculative? I mean, guesswork concerning what kind of intention(s) people have while posting a picture, well, does it matter? And why should anyone engage themselves with such kind of speculations when there is no way one can adequately and reasonably be aware of the actual intentions? Surely one can make qualified guesses, but I couldn't care less about intentions behind making a post, I only pay attention to what is actually posted.
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 11:21
------------- What? |
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 11:40
|
Well okay. I didn't address you as a moderator and I trust that you know what you are doing and I have no reason to believe otherwise.
I disagree (very much) that people posting the covers you spoke about should be considered clowns in any way. |
Posted By: akamaisondufromage
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 11:44
its not ------------- Help me I'm falling! |
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 11:46
------------- What? |
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 11:53
------------- What? |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 12:05
I'm not doubting that for a moment. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 17:09
| Allright, I want more bad cover art. |
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 17:12
|
http://www.gigwise.com/photos/41675/1/The-50-Most-Controversial-Album-Covers-Of-All-Time" rel="nofollow - http://www.gigwise.com/photos/41675/1/The-50-Most-Controversial-Album-Covers-Of-All-Time
------------- "Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent." Charles Bukowski |
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: April 16 2011 at 17:46
 ------------- "Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood) |
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 17 2011 at 06:14
 I'd like to attach a few notes: It's the cover of a spectacular Danish left-wing gay-activisme record from 1975, presumeably the very first of its kind in the world. 'Bøsse' means "gay," and 'bøssernes befrielses front' means "the gays' liberation front". The record basically believes that we are born with the same degree of likelihood of turning either hetero- or homosexual. The society is the main problem, it promotes a suppressing hetero-normality and marks homosexuality a deviant disease. I don't agree that hetero-sexuality exclusively is brought upon by the society, I'm not gay, but I have much sympathy for this record, it's very courageous and the lyrics are very straight-forward in your face accounts of gay-activities as well as attempts at converting the listener: How do you know you aren't gay if you have never tried kissing a man? is a rhetorical question repeated in various alternations in one of the most remarkable songs on the record, How do you know? But the cover is horrible.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 17 2011 at 06:15
|
^ You do have a fondness for male genitalia. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Paravion
Date Posted: April 17 2011 at 06:17
The mind works in mysterious ways.
 |
Posted By: El Pollo Guerrera
Date Posted: April 19 2011 at 00:50
   |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 20 2011 at 22:34
|
I find this one to be unintentionally hilarious.
Satan Is Real by The Louvin Brothers.
 ------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 01:48
Jesus Use Me by The Faith Tones.
 ------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 02:00
|
More can be found here.
http://funniez.net/Funny-Pictures/worst-album-covers.html" rel="nofollow - http://funniez.net/Funny-Pictures/worst-album-covers.html
 ------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 02:24
Not the best graphic I've ever seen but I like it. 
 ------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 02:39
|
http://www.coverbrowser.com/covers/worst-album-covers" rel="nofollow - http://www.coverbrowser.com/covers/worst-album-covers
------------- https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album! http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385 |
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 02:49
| There are a few really bad sleeve designs from the Scorpions catalog, at least 3-4 that I can remember. I think they had legal issues with one of them in that it was similar to the Blind Faith cover art (except way more graphic), and it had to be recalled. I don't have time to get the links up right now, but try a Google search for "Animal Magnetism," and see what you come up with. |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 03:25
Lovedrive I thought was a laugh, but the original Virgin Killer cover? I'm surprised they still have a career after that. You'll have to look it up yourself. That one I refuse to own.
Animal Magnetism I've had in my CD collection for decades.
The original Taken By Force cover was banned as well. ------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: catfood03
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 20:51
 I used to hate this cover until I purchased the album and fell in love with the music. Now I really like the cover, but I know some still gripe about it (and No More Stories...) so I'll still post it. Don't judge a cover by it's music? |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 21:06
------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: catfood03
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 21:28
| ^ Their name is "Mew" and they're included here on ProgArchives, btw ( http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=4981" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=4981) |
Posted By: Pastor Rex Cat
Date Posted: April 21 2011 at 22:42
Here's one of their videos I found so far and they are a very new band. Interested to see what their future musical projects are.
A Wiki on New Prog.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_prog" rel="nofollow - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_prog
------------- http://revbookburn.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/rexcat http://www.myspace.com/prxcat Greetings! And Welcome to The Global Internet Church of Prog! Hail the Prog and Praise "Bob"! |
Posted By: catfood03
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 00:06
 What am I looking at here? I always thought this was bad graphics, especially compared to album covers like Crossings and Sextant |
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 00:49
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 00:50
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 00:55
|
^ The hair looks like it was photoshopped on
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 01:07
I will not post the so-called "Virgin Killer" original cover art either, or ever look at it again, but I have seen it once. For those who have not: Trust me, it is horrendous enough that I would not be surprised if simply owning it is grounds for a warrant of arrest in certain jurisdictions of the USA, based on current child protection laws. Child porn is NOT acceptable under any circumstances, which probably explains why one of the guys from the Scorpions ended up living broke and homeless in the 90's. |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 03:18
It isn't porn, but this a ridiculous thing to say anyway. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: giselle
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 05:10
I like Clouds a lot, I saw the original 1-2-3, and I often champion their cause. But this cover (and title!) are really naff and don't do the band any favours.
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 05:11
|
I quite like its naive charm. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: giselle
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 05:34
| That's a good phrase, "naive charm". I like that description, but I can relate to the naive rather than the charm! |
Posted By: Icarium
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 06:08
this one is just wrong, I like the idea but it looks desperate and traying to be funny
 -------------
|
Posted By: catfood03
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 08:30
...like the B-52's perhaps? |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 08:49
I like that one a lot. |
Posted By: catfood03
Date Posted: April 23 2011 at 13:50
|
^ yeah... those tattoos are really cool! |
Posted By: Textbook
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 04:28
New Wierd Al cover. Best cover ever actually, screw the intent of the thread.
|
Posted By: Henry Plainview
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 15:24
It is. However, the cover for the new Lady Gaga album is, inexplicably, one of the worst.  Maybe she's giving up. ------------- if you own a sodastream i hate you |
Posted By: stonebeard
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 15:27
|
95% of modern prog album covers, especially in progressive metal, neo-prog, crossover (lolnotagenre), and symphonic prog. They looks like some discovered photoshop, metaphors, and cheesiness all at once. ------------- http://soundcloud.com/drewagler" rel="nofollow - My soundcloud. Please give feedback if you want! |
Posted By: Hoipolloi
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 15:58
 |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 16:45
+1
|
Posted By: The Dark Elf
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 17:05
Wait...isn't the one on the right Robbie Coltrane in a wig and glasses? I think he wore that in Nuns on the Run. ------------- ...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 25 2011 at 18:31
|
Even if they had hair we would consider normal at this point in time, would we be less frightened?
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: irrelevant
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 05:22
+2, though I'd say it's probably less than 95% ------------- https://gabebuller.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - New album! http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385" rel="nofollow - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=7385 |
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 06:01
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 06:21
People, this thread is on a prog forum & must therefore contain at least one image of a Hammond being towed on a raft. 
Jeez - am I the only one thinking inbreeding is bad m'kay?  ------------- 
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: April 26 2011 at 06:27
There's a new tendency of giving up altogether. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: September 03 2011 at 01:13
|
LOL the title! ------------- "Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent." Charles Bukowski |
Posted By: criticdrummer94
Date Posted: September 06 2011 at 09:34
I don't think even H.R. Giger would vomit and sh*t this at the same time. Pardon my language -------------  
MY IDOLS |
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: October 08 2011 at 06:48
|
Nice list: http://rateyourmusic.com/list/djlanda/the_100_worst_album_covers_ever" rel="nofollow - http://rateyourmusic.com/list/djlanda/the_100_worst_album_covers_ever |
Posted By: 40footwolf
Date Posted: October 09 2011 at 02:42
Has anyone brought up this one yet? Because this is hard if not f**king impossible to top. ------------- Heaven's made a cesspool of us all. |